Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite

ÖĞRETİM ELEMANLARININ İŞ TATMİNİ: ANKARA’DA DEVLET VE ÖZEL ÜNİVERSİTE KARŞILAŞTIRMASI

Year 2001, Volume: 19 Issue: 2, 159 - 178, 31.12.2001

Abstract

Çalışanın işinden beklediği sonuç ile gerçekte işi yapması karşılığında
edindiği sonuç arasındaki denge, bireyin işinden elde ettiği tatmin düzeyini
ifade etmekte ve onun çalışmaya dönük olan istekliliğini etkilemektedir.



 



Bu çalışmada, Spector(1994) tarafından geliştirilen iş tatmini anketi,
biri devlet ve diğeri özel olmak üzere Ankara’daki iki üniversitenin İşletme
bölümlerinde görev yapmakta olan öğretim elemanlarına uygulanmıştır. Öğretim
elemanlarının iş tatmini düzeyleri 9 farklı iş boyutu açısından
değerlendirilmiş, toplam iş tatmini yüzdeleri, demografik özellikleri de gözönüne
alınarak,  çapraz tablolama yöntemi ile
belirlenmeye çalışılmıştır. Sonuçta, özel üniversitede görev yapan öğretim
elemanları işlerinden tatminsizlik duymadıklarını ifade etmiş olmalarına rağmen,
devlet üniversitesinde çalışan öğretim elemanlarının özel üniversitede
çalışanlara oranla toplam iş tatmini bakımından daha tatmin oldukları
görülmüştür. Devlet üniversitesinde çalışan öğretim elemanları en fazla ücret,
ek imkanlar, olası ödüller, işleyiş prosedürleri bakımından tatminsizlik,
yaşadıklarını ifade ederken, özel üniversitede tatminsizlik daha ziyade işleyiş
prosedürleri boyutunda görülmüştür.

References

  • Centers, R., Bugental, D. E., “Intrinsic and Extrinsic Job Motivations Among Different Segments of the Working Population”. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1966, 50, pp:193-197.
  • Graham, M.W., Messner, P.E., “Principals and Job Satisfaction”, International Journal of Educational Management, Vol:12, No:5, 1998, pp:196-202.
  • Hulin, C. L., Water, L.K., “Regression Analysis of Three Variations of the Two- Factor Theory of Job Satisfaction”, Journal of Applied Psychology, vol:55, no:3, 1971, pp:211-217.
  • Hulin, C.L., Smith, P.A., “An Empirical Investigation of Two Implications of Two- Factor Theory of Job Satisfaction”, Journal of Applied Psychology, vol:51, no:5, 1967, pp: 396-402.
  • Imparota, N., “Relationship Between Porter’s Need Satisfaction Questionnaire and the Job Descriptive Index”, Journal of Applied Psychology, 1972, Vol. 56, No:5, pp: 397-405.
  • Iris, B., Barret, G.V., “Some Relations Between Job and Life Satisfaction and Job Importance”, Journal of Applied Psychology, vol:56, no:4, 1972, pp: 301- 304.
  • Lindsay, G.A., Marks, E., ve Gorlow, L., “The Herzberg Theory. A critique and Reformulation”, Journal of Applied Psychology, vol:51, no:4, 1967, pp: 330-339.
  • Locke, E. A., “What is Job Satisfaction” Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, vol:4, 1969,pp: 309-336.
  • Milburne, G., Francis G. J. “All About Job Satisfaction”, Supervisory Management, 1981, vol:26, No:4, pp:35-43.
  • Newby, J.E. “Job Satisfaction of Middle School Principles in Virginia”, Dissertation, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University 1999.
  • Quarstein, V.A., McAfee, R.B. Glassman, M., “The Situational Occurrences Theory of Job Satisfaction”, Human Relations , vol:45, no:8, 1992, pp:859- 873.
  • Oshagbemi, T., “Job Satisfaction and Dissatisfaction in Higher Education”, Education + Training , vol: 39, no: 9, 1997, pp.354-359.
  • ___________, “The Influence of Rank on the Job Satisfaction of Organizational Members”, Journal of Managerial Psychology, vol:12, no:8, 1997, pp.511- 519.
  • ___________, “Job Satisfaction Profiles of University Teachers”, Journal of Managerial Psychology, vol:12, no:1, 1997, pp:27-39.
  • ___________, “Gender Differences in the Job Satisfaction of University Teachers”, Women in Management Review, vol:15, no:7, 2000, pp:331-343.
  • Robbins, S. P., Organizational Behavior: Concepts, Controversies, Applications, Prentice Hall International Editions, 1993.
  • Sloane, P.J., Ward, M. E., “Cohort Effects and Job Satisfaction Of Academics”, Applied Economics Letters, vol:8, 2001, pp: 787-791.
  • Spector, P. E., “Job Satisfaction Survey”, Copyright, 1994, http://chuma.cas.usf.edu/~spector/scales/jssovr.html
  • Wanous, J.P., Lawler III, E.E., “Measurement and Meaning of Job Satisfaction”, Journal of Applied Psychology, vol:56, no:2, 1972, pp: 95-105.

Job Satisfaction of Teaching Personnel: Comparison of a State University and a Private Foundation University in Ankara

Year 2001, Volume: 19 Issue: 2, 159 - 178, 31.12.2001

Abstract

Job satisfaction can be described as the
balance between the employees’ expected benefit after accomplishing a task and
the actual benefits obtained.

 





Data was collected from a sample of full
time academic members (teaching and research) of a private and state university
business administration departments, using Spector’s job satisfaction
questionnaire. Job satisfaction levels of respondents were evaluated at nine
different job dimensions by also taking account of differentials due to
demographic variables. Results of the analysis 
indicated that, although academic members of the private university did
not report any job  dissatisfaction in
total, state university academic members seemed to be more satisfied with their
jobs. While academic members working for the state university stated highest
dissatisfaction with their pay, fringe benefits, possible rewards and
procedures, private university’s academic members were mostly dissatisfied with
procedures.  

References

  • Centers, R., Bugental, D. E., “Intrinsic and Extrinsic Job Motivations Among Different Segments of the Working Population”. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1966, 50, pp:193-197.
  • Graham, M.W., Messner, P.E., “Principals and Job Satisfaction”, International Journal of Educational Management, Vol:12, No:5, 1998, pp:196-202.
  • Hulin, C. L., Water, L.K., “Regression Analysis of Three Variations of the Two- Factor Theory of Job Satisfaction”, Journal of Applied Psychology, vol:55, no:3, 1971, pp:211-217.
  • Hulin, C.L., Smith, P.A., “An Empirical Investigation of Two Implications of Two- Factor Theory of Job Satisfaction”, Journal of Applied Psychology, vol:51, no:5, 1967, pp: 396-402.
  • Imparota, N., “Relationship Between Porter’s Need Satisfaction Questionnaire and the Job Descriptive Index”, Journal of Applied Psychology, 1972, Vol. 56, No:5, pp: 397-405.
  • Iris, B., Barret, G.V., “Some Relations Between Job and Life Satisfaction and Job Importance”, Journal of Applied Psychology, vol:56, no:4, 1972, pp: 301- 304.
  • Lindsay, G.A., Marks, E., ve Gorlow, L., “The Herzberg Theory. A critique and Reformulation”, Journal of Applied Psychology, vol:51, no:4, 1967, pp: 330-339.
  • Locke, E. A., “What is Job Satisfaction” Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, vol:4, 1969,pp: 309-336.
  • Milburne, G., Francis G. J. “All About Job Satisfaction”, Supervisory Management, 1981, vol:26, No:4, pp:35-43.
  • Newby, J.E. “Job Satisfaction of Middle School Principles in Virginia”, Dissertation, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University 1999.
  • Quarstein, V.A., McAfee, R.B. Glassman, M., “The Situational Occurrences Theory of Job Satisfaction”, Human Relations , vol:45, no:8, 1992, pp:859- 873.
  • Oshagbemi, T., “Job Satisfaction and Dissatisfaction in Higher Education”, Education + Training , vol: 39, no: 9, 1997, pp.354-359.
  • ___________, “The Influence of Rank on the Job Satisfaction of Organizational Members”, Journal of Managerial Psychology, vol:12, no:8, 1997, pp.511- 519.
  • ___________, “Job Satisfaction Profiles of University Teachers”, Journal of Managerial Psychology, vol:12, no:1, 1997, pp:27-39.
  • ___________, “Gender Differences in the Job Satisfaction of University Teachers”, Women in Management Review, vol:15, no:7, 2000, pp:331-343.
  • Robbins, S. P., Organizational Behavior: Concepts, Controversies, Applications, Prentice Hall International Editions, 1993.
  • Sloane, P.J., Ward, M. E., “Cohort Effects and Job Satisfaction Of Academics”, Applied Economics Letters, vol:8, 2001, pp: 787-791.
  • Spector, P. E., “Job Satisfaction Survey”, Copyright, 1994, http://chuma.cas.usf.edu/~spector/scales/jssovr.html
  • Wanous, J.P., Lawler III, E.E., “Measurement and Meaning of Job Satisfaction”, Journal of Applied Psychology, vol:56, no:2, 1972, pp: 95-105.
There are 19 citations in total.

Details

Journal Section Articles
Authors

Azize Ergeneli

Mehmet Eryiğit This is me

Publication Date December 31, 2001
Submission Date June 6, 2017
Published in Issue Year 2001 Volume: 19 Issue: 2

Cite

APA Ergeneli, A., & Eryiğit, M. (2001). ÖĞRETİM ELEMANLARININ İŞ TATMİNİ: ANKARA’DA DEVLET VE ÖZEL ÜNİVERSİTE KARŞILAŞTIRMASI. Hacettepe Üniversitesi İktisadi Ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 19(2), 159-178.
AMA Ergeneli A, Eryiğit M. ÖĞRETİM ELEMANLARININ İŞ TATMİNİ: ANKARA’DA DEVLET VE ÖZEL ÜNİVERSİTE KARŞILAŞTIRMASI. Hacettepe Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi. December 2001;19(2):159-178.
Chicago Ergeneli, Azize, and Mehmet Eryiğit. “ÖĞRETİM ELEMANLARININ İŞ TATMİNİ: ANKARA’DA DEVLET VE ÖZEL ÜNİVERSİTE KARŞILAŞTIRMASI”. Hacettepe Üniversitesi İktisadi Ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi 19, no. 2 (December 2001): 159-78.
EndNote Ergeneli A, Eryiğit M (December 1, 2001) ÖĞRETİM ELEMANLARININ İŞ TATMİNİ: ANKARA’DA DEVLET VE ÖZEL ÜNİVERSİTE KARŞILAŞTIRMASI. Hacettepe Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi 19 2 159–178.
IEEE A. Ergeneli and M. Eryiğit, “ÖĞRETİM ELEMANLARININ İŞ TATMİNİ: ANKARA’DA DEVLET VE ÖZEL ÜNİVERSİTE KARŞILAŞTIRMASI”, Hacettepe Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 159–178, 2001.
ISNAD Ergeneli, Azize - Eryiğit, Mehmet. “ÖĞRETİM ELEMANLARININ İŞ TATMİNİ: ANKARA’DA DEVLET VE ÖZEL ÜNİVERSİTE KARŞILAŞTIRMASI”. Hacettepe Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi 19/2 (December 2001), 159-178.
JAMA Ergeneli A, Eryiğit M. ÖĞRETİM ELEMANLARININ İŞ TATMİNİ: ANKARA’DA DEVLET VE ÖZEL ÜNİVERSİTE KARŞILAŞTIRMASI. Hacettepe Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi. 2001;19:159–178.
MLA Ergeneli, Azize and Mehmet Eryiğit. “ÖĞRETİM ELEMANLARININ İŞ TATMİNİ: ANKARA’DA DEVLET VE ÖZEL ÜNİVERSİTE KARŞILAŞTIRMASI”. Hacettepe Üniversitesi İktisadi Ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, vol. 19, no. 2, 2001, pp. 159-78.
Vancouver Ergeneli A, Eryiğit M. ÖĞRETİM ELEMANLARININ İŞ TATMİNİ: ANKARA’DA DEVLET VE ÖZEL ÜNİVERSİTE KARŞILAŞTIRMASI. Hacettepe Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi. 2001;19(2):159-78.

Manuscripts must conform to the requirements indicated on the last page of the Journal - Guide for Authors- and in the web page.


Privacy Statement

Names and e-mail addresses in this Journal Web page will only be used for the specified purposes of the Journal; they will not be opened for any other purpose or use by any other person.