Araştırma Makalesi
BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster

Türk Devletlerinde Ekonomik, Sosyal ve Politik Küreselleşme ile Ekonomik Performans Arasındaki İlişki

Yıl 2023, Cilt: 24 Sayı: 2, 321 - 335, 10.08.2023

Türker Şimşek

https://doi.org/10.17494/ogusbd.1287909

Öz

Bu makale, KOF küreselleşme endeksinin alt boyutları olan ekonomik, sosyal ve politik küreselleşme endeksleri ile Türk Devletlerinde ekonomik performanslar arasındaki ilişkiyi 1991-2019 dönemi için incelemektedir. Analizde uygulanan Dinamik Sıradan En Küçük Kareler Ortalama Grubu (DOLSMG-Demean) yöntemi sonucunda, Türk Devletlerinde ekonomik performans ile ekonomik küreselleşme arasında pozitif ve istatistiksel olarak anlamlı; ekonomik performans ile sosyal küreselleşme arasında negatif ve istatistiksel olarak anlamlı bir ilişki tespit edilmiştir. Bunun yanında politik küreselleşme ekonomik büyümeyi olumlu etkilese bile istatistiksel olarak anlamlı bulunmamıştır. Bu nedenle hükümetler vergi politikalarını iyileştirerek dış ticaret engellerini azaltmalı, dış ticaret hacmini artırmalı, uluslararası ticareti teşvik etmeli ve ekonomik küreselleşmeden daha fazla yararlanmalıdır. Ayrıca, sosyal küreselleşmenin ekonomik büyüme üzerindeki olumsuz etkilerini azaltan politikalar benimsenmelidir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Ekonomik Küreselleşme Sosyal Küreselleşme Politik Küreselleşme Panel Veri Analizi

Kaynakça

  • Bataka, H. (2019). De jure, De facto Globalization and Economic Growth in SubSaharan Africa. Journal of Economic Integration, 34(1), 133-158.
  • Borensztein, E., Gregorio, J. D., & Lee, J.-W. (1998). How Does Foreign Direct Investment Affect Economic Growth? Journal of International Economics, (45), 115-135.
  • Breusch, T. & Pagan, A. (1980). The Lagrange Multiplier Test and Its Applications to Model Specification in Econometrics. Review of Economic Studies, 47(1), 239-253.
  • Brunner, A. D. (2003). The Long-run Effects of Trade on Income and Income Growth. IMF Working Paper (No 03/37). Washington: International Monetary Fund Institute.
  • Chang, C.-P., & Lee, C.-C. (2010). Globalization and Economic Growth: A Political Economy Analysis for OECD Countries. Global Economic Review,39(2), 151-173.
  • Chang, C.-P., Lee, C.-C., & Hsieh, M.-C. (2011). Globalization, Real Output, and Multiple Structural Breaks. Global Economic Review, 40(4), 421-444.
  • Clark, W. C. (2000). Environmental Globalization, In Governance in a Globalizing World (eds. Joseph S. N. and J. D. Donahue), Brookings Institution Press, Washington, DC.
  • Çelik, M. Y., & Ünsür, Z. (2020). Küreselleşme ve Büyüme İlişkisinin Dumitrescu-Hurlin Panel Nedensellik Testi İle Belirlenmesi. İzmir İktisat Dergisi,35(1), 201-210.
  • Dreher, A. (2006). Does Globalization Affect Growth? Evidence from a new Index of Globalization. Applied Economics, 10(38), 1091- 1110.
  • Dreher, A., Gaston, N. & Martens, P. (2008). Measuring Globalization - Gauging its Consequence, New York: Springer.
  • Elsherif, M.A. (2016). The Impact of Globalization on Economic Conditions: Empirical Evidence from the MENA Region. International Journal of Business and Economic Development, 4(1), 1-14.
  • Fisher, S. (2000). Globalization: Threat or Opportunity? IMF Issues Brief.
  • Gengenbach, C., Urbain, J. P., & Westerlund, J. (2015). Error Correction Testing in Panels with Common Stochastic Trends. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 31(6), 982-1004.
  • Grubel, H. & Lloyd, P. (1975). Intra-industry Trade. London: McMillan.
  • Heckscher, E. E. (1919). The Effect of Foreign Trade on the Distribution of Income. Economisk Tidskrift. Reprinted in Heckscher, E.E. & Ohlin, B. (1991). Heckscher-Ohlin Trade Theory. (Translated, Edited and Introduced by Flam, H. & Flanders, H. J.). Cambridge, Mass.: The MIT Press.
  • Jan Nederveen P. (2015). Globalization and Culture: Global Mélange (Lanham: Rowman and Littlefield, 2015).
  • Keesing, D. B. (1965). Labor Skills and International Trade: Evaluating Many Trade Flows With A Single Measuring Device. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 287-294.
  • Keesing, D. B. (1966). Labor Skills and Comparative Advantage. The American Economic Review, 56(1/2), 249-258.
  • Kenen, P. B. (1965). Nature, Capital, and Trade. Journal of Political Economy, 73(5), 437-460.
  • Krugman, P. (1979). Increasing Returns, Monopolistic Competition and International Trade. Journal of International Economics, 9(4), 469-479.
  • Krugman, P. (1980). Scale Economies, Product Differentiation, and the Pattern of Trade. American Economic Review, 70(5), 950-959.
  • Krugman, P. (1981). Intra-industry Specialization and the Gains from Trade. Journal of Political Economy, 89(5), 959-973.
  • Leitao, N.C. (2013). Cultural Globalization and Economic Growth. The Romanian Economic Journal, 17-28.
  • Liu, Y., Adejumo, A. V., Adejumo, O. O., & Aderemi, T. A. (2022). Globalization and Economic Growth: A Sustainability Analysis for South Asia Countries. Global Policy.
  • Maqbool-ur-Rahman, M. (2015). Impacts of Globalization on Economic Growth-Evidence From Selected South Asian Countries. Journal of Management Sciences, 2(1), 185-204.
  • Marshall A. (2003). Money, Credit, and Commerce. New York: Prometheus Boks.
  • Norris, P. (2000). Global Governance and Cosmopolitan Citizens. In: Governance in a Globalizing World (eds. Joseph S. N. and J. D. Donahue), Brookings Institution Press, Washington, DC.
  • Ohlin, B. (1933). Interregional and International Trade. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Pedroni, P. (2001). Purchasing Power Parity Tests in Cointegrated Panels. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 83 (4), 727-731.
  • Personal del Fondo Monetario Internacional (FMI), “La Globalización: ¿Amenaza u Oportunidad?”, IMF, abril de 2020, http://www.imf.org/external/np/exr/ib/2000/esl/ 041200s.htm.
  • Pesaran, M. Hashem. (2004). General Diagnostic Tests for Cross Section Dependence in Panels, Working Paper No:0435, University of Cambridge.
  • Pesaran, M. Hashem. (2007). A simple panel unit root test in the presence of cross-section dependence. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 22(2), 265-312.
  • Pesaran, M. Hashem & Takashi Yamagata (2008). Testing Slope Homogeneity in Large Panels. Journal of Econometrics, 142(1), pp. 50-93.
  • Pieterse, J. N. (2015). History and Hegemony: The United States and Twenty-First Century Globalization. In The Routledge International Handbook of Globalization Studies (pp. 131-147). Routledge.
  • Posner, M.V. (1961). International Trade and Technical Change. (Ed.: Lamberton, D.M.). Economics of Innovation and Knowledge. London: Penguin Modern Economics.
  • Rao, B. B., & Vadlamannati, K. C. (2011). Globalization and Growth in The Low-Income African Countries with The Extreme Bounds Analysis. Economic Modelling, 28(3), 795-805.
  • Ricardo, D. (1817). On the Principles of Political Economy and Taxation: London.
  • Rybczynski, T. (1955). Factor Endowments and Relative Commodity Prices. Economica, New Series, 22(88), 336- 341.
  • Sachs, J. D., & Warner, A. (1995). Economic Reform and The Process of Global Integration. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, (1), 1-118.
  • Samimi, P., & Jenatabadi, H. S. (2014). Globalization and Economic Growth: Empirical Evidence on The Role of Complementarities. PloS one, 9(4), 1-7.
  • Savrul, M., Incekara, A. (2017). The Effect of Globalization On Economic Growth: Panel Data Analysis for ASEAN Countries. International Conference On Eurasian Economies, 2017, 16-22.
  • Stolper, W.F. & Samuelson, M.A. (1941). Protection and Real Wages. Review of Economic Studies, 9(1), 58-73.
  • Swamy, P. A. (1970). Efficient Inference in a Random Coefficient Regression Model. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, 38(2), 311- 323.
  • Xu, X., Abbas, H. S. M., Sun, C., Gillani, S., Ullah, A., & Raza, M. A. A. (2021). Impact of Globalization and Governance Determinants on Economic Growth: An Empirical Analysis of Asian Economies. Growth and Change, 52 (2), 1137-1154.

The Relationship Between Economic, Social, and Political Globalization and Economic Performance In Turkic States

Yıl 2023, Cilt: 24 Sayı: 2, 321 - 335, 10.08.2023

Türker Şimşek

https://doi.org/10.17494/ogusbd.1287909

Öz

This article examines the relationship between economic, social and political globalization indices, which are the sub-dimensions of KOF globalization index, and economic performances in Turkish States for the period 1991-2019. As a result of the Dynamic Ordinary Least Squares Mean Group (DOLSMG-Demean) method applied in the analysis, there is a positive and statistically significant relationship between economic performance and economic globalization in Turkic States; A negative and statistically significant relationship is found between economic performance and social globalization. In addition, although political globalization has a positive effect on economic growth, it is not statistically significant. For this reason, governments should reduce foreign trade barriers, increase foreign trade volume, encourage international trade and benefit more from economic globalization by improving their tax policies. In addition, policies that reduce the negative effects of social globalization on economic growth should be adopted.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Economic Globalization Social Globalization Political Globalization Panel Data Analysis

Kaynakça

  • Bataka, H. (2019). De jure, De facto Globalization and Economic Growth in SubSaharan Africa. Journal of Economic Integration, 34(1), 133-158.
  • Borensztein, E., Gregorio, J. D., & Lee, J.-W. (1998). How Does Foreign Direct Investment Affect Economic Growth? Journal of International Economics, (45), 115-135.
  • Breusch, T. & Pagan, A. (1980). The Lagrange Multiplier Test and Its Applications to Model Specification in Econometrics. Review of Economic Studies, 47(1), 239-253.
  • Brunner, A. D. (2003). The Long-run Effects of Trade on Income and Income Growth. IMF Working Paper (No 03/37). Washington: International Monetary Fund Institute.
  • Chang, C.-P., & Lee, C.-C. (2010). Globalization and Economic Growth: A Political Economy Analysis for OECD Countries. Global Economic Review,39(2), 151-173.
  • Chang, C.-P., Lee, C.-C., & Hsieh, M.-C. (2011). Globalization, Real Output, and Multiple Structural Breaks. Global Economic Review, 40(4), 421-444.
  • Clark, W. C. (2000). Environmental Globalization, In Governance in a Globalizing World (eds. Joseph S. N. and J. D. Donahue), Brookings Institution Press, Washington, DC.
  • Çelik, M. Y., & Ünsür, Z. (2020). Küreselleşme ve Büyüme İlişkisinin Dumitrescu-Hurlin Panel Nedensellik Testi İle Belirlenmesi. İzmir İktisat Dergisi,35(1), 201-210.
  • Dreher, A. (2006). Does Globalization Affect Growth? Evidence from a new Index of Globalization. Applied Economics, 10(38), 1091- 1110.
  • Dreher, A., Gaston, N. & Martens, P. (2008). Measuring Globalization - Gauging its Consequence, New York: Springer.
  • Elsherif, M.A. (2016). The Impact of Globalization on Economic Conditions: Empirical Evidence from the MENA Region. International Journal of Business and Economic Development, 4(1), 1-14.
  • Fisher, S. (2000). Globalization: Threat or Opportunity? IMF Issues Brief.
  • Gengenbach, C., Urbain, J. P., & Westerlund, J. (2015). Error Correction Testing in Panels with Common Stochastic Trends. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 31(6), 982-1004.
  • Grubel, H. & Lloyd, P. (1975). Intra-industry Trade. London: McMillan.
  • Heckscher, E. E. (1919). The Effect of Foreign Trade on the Distribution of Income. Economisk Tidskrift. Reprinted in Heckscher, E.E. & Ohlin, B. (1991). Heckscher-Ohlin Trade Theory. (Translated, Edited and Introduced by Flam, H. & Flanders, H. J.). Cambridge, Mass.: The MIT Press.
  • Jan Nederveen P. (2015). Globalization and Culture: Global Mélange (Lanham: Rowman and Littlefield, 2015).
  • Keesing, D. B. (1965). Labor Skills and International Trade: Evaluating Many Trade Flows With A Single Measuring Device. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 287-294.
  • Keesing, D. B. (1966). Labor Skills and Comparative Advantage. The American Economic Review, 56(1/2), 249-258.
  • Kenen, P. B. (1965). Nature, Capital, and Trade. Journal of Political Economy, 73(5), 437-460.
  • Krugman, P. (1979). Increasing Returns, Monopolistic Competition and International Trade. Journal of International Economics, 9(4), 469-479.
  • Krugman, P. (1980). Scale Economies, Product Differentiation, and the Pattern of Trade. American Economic Review, 70(5), 950-959.
  • Krugman, P. (1981). Intra-industry Specialization and the Gains from Trade. Journal of Political Economy, 89(5), 959-973.
  • Leitao, N.C. (2013). Cultural Globalization and Economic Growth. The Romanian Economic Journal, 17-28.
  • Liu, Y., Adejumo, A. V., Adejumo, O. O., & Aderemi, T. A. (2022). Globalization and Economic Growth: A Sustainability Analysis for South Asia Countries. Global Policy.
  • Maqbool-ur-Rahman, M. (2015). Impacts of Globalization on Economic Growth-Evidence From Selected South Asian Countries. Journal of Management Sciences, 2(1), 185-204.
  • Marshall A. (2003). Money, Credit, and Commerce. New York: Prometheus Boks.
  • Norris, P. (2000). Global Governance and Cosmopolitan Citizens. In: Governance in a Globalizing World (eds. Joseph S. N. and J. D. Donahue), Brookings Institution Press, Washington, DC.
  • Ohlin, B. (1933). Interregional and International Trade. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Pedroni, P. (2001). Purchasing Power Parity Tests in Cointegrated Panels. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 83 (4), 727-731.
  • Personal del Fondo Monetario Internacional (FMI), “La Globalización: ¿Amenaza u Oportunidad?”, IMF, abril de 2020, http://www.imf.org/external/np/exr/ib/2000/esl/ 041200s.htm.
  • Pesaran, M. Hashem. (2004). General Diagnostic Tests for Cross Section Dependence in Panels, Working Paper No:0435, University of Cambridge.
  • Pesaran, M. Hashem. (2007). A simple panel unit root test in the presence of cross-section dependence. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 22(2), 265-312.
  • Pesaran, M. Hashem & Takashi Yamagata (2008). Testing Slope Homogeneity in Large Panels. Journal of Econometrics, 142(1), pp. 50-93.
  • Pieterse, J. N. (2015). History and Hegemony: The United States and Twenty-First Century Globalization. In The Routledge International Handbook of Globalization Studies (pp. 131-147). Routledge.
  • Posner, M.V. (1961). International Trade and Technical Change. (Ed.: Lamberton, D.M.). Economics of Innovation and Knowledge. London: Penguin Modern Economics.
  • Rao, B. B., & Vadlamannati, K. C. (2011). Globalization and Growth in The Low-Income African Countries with The Extreme Bounds Analysis. Economic Modelling, 28(3), 795-805.
  • Ricardo, D. (1817). On the Principles of Political Economy and Taxation: London.
  • Rybczynski, T. (1955). Factor Endowments and Relative Commodity Prices. Economica, New Series, 22(88), 336- 341.
  • Sachs, J. D., & Warner, A. (1995). Economic Reform and The Process of Global Integration. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, (1), 1-118.
  • Samimi, P., & Jenatabadi, H. S. (2014). Globalization and Economic Growth: Empirical Evidence on The Role of Complementarities. PloS one, 9(4), 1-7.
  • Savrul, M., Incekara, A. (2017). The Effect of Globalization On Economic Growth: Panel Data Analysis for ASEAN Countries. International Conference On Eurasian Economies, 2017, 16-22.
  • Stolper, W.F. & Samuelson, M.A. (1941). Protection and Real Wages. Review of Economic Studies, 9(1), 58-73.
  • Swamy, P. A. (1970). Efficient Inference in a Random Coefficient Regression Model. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, 38(2), 311- 323.
  • Xu, X., Abbas, H. S. M., Sun, C., Gillani, S., Ullah, A., & Raza, M. A. A. (2021). Impact of Globalization and Governance Determinants on Economic Growth: An Empirical Analysis of Asian Economies. Growth and Change, 52 (2), 1137-1154.
Toplam 44 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil İngilizce
Bölüm Makaleler
Yazarlar

Türker Şimşek 0000-0001-7581-7590

Yayımlanma Tarihi 10 Ağustos 2023
Gönderilme Tarihi 26 Nisan 2023
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2023 Cilt: 24 Sayı: 2

Kaynak Göster

APA Şimşek, T. (2023). The Relationship Between Economic, Social, and Political Globalization and Economic Performance In Turkic States. Eskişehir Osmangazi Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 24(2), 321-335. https://doi.org/10.17494/ogusbd.1287909
AMA Şimşek T. The Relationship Between Economic, Social, and Political Globalization and Economic Performance In Turkic States. Eskişehir Osmangazi Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi. Ağustos 2023;24(2):321-335. doi:10.17494/ogusbd.1287909
Chicago Şimşek, Türker. “The Relationship Between Economic, Social, and Political Globalization and Economic Performance In Turkic States”. Eskişehir Osmangazi Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi 24, sy. 2 (Ağustos 2023): 321-35. https://doi.org/10.17494/ogusbd.1287909.
EndNote Şimşek T (01 Ağustos 2023) The Relationship Between Economic, Social, and Political Globalization and Economic Performance In Turkic States. Eskişehir Osmangazi Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi 24 2 321–335.
IEEE T. Şimşek, “The Relationship Between Economic, Social, and Political Globalization and Economic Performance In Turkic States”, Eskişehir Osmangazi Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, c. 24, sy. 2, ss. 321–335, 2023, doi: 10.17494/ogusbd.1287909.
ISNAD Şimşek, Türker. “The Relationship Between Economic, Social, and Political Globalization and Economic Performance In Turkic States”. Eskişehir Osmangazi Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi 24/2 (Ağustos 2023), 321-335. https://doi.org/10.17494/ogusbd.1287909.
JAMA Şimşek T. The Relationship Between Economic, Social, and Political Globalization and Economic Performance In Turkic States. Eskişehir Osmangazi Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi. 2023;24:321–335.
MLA Şimşek, Türker. “The Relationship Between Economic, Social, and Political Globalization and Economic Performance In Turkic States”. Eskişehir Osmangazi Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, c. 24, sy. 2, 2023, ss. 321-35, doi:10.17494/ogusbd.1287909.
Vancouver Şimşek T. The Relationship Between Economic, Social, and Political Globalization and Economic Performance In Turkic States. Eskişehir Osmangazi Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi. 2023;24(2):321-35.
 Kapak Resmi İndir