Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite

Organizational Sustainability, Employee Relations, and the Mediating Role of Corporate Communication: UK F&B Sector Analysis

Year 2026, Volume: 27 Issue: 1, 304 - 330, 26.01.2026
https://doi.org/10.37880/cumuiibf.1822671

Abstract

This study investigates the impact of sustainable business practices on employee relations and the mediating role of corporate communication in this interaction. A quantitative analysis was conducted with 500 employees, selected through random sampling, from five food and beverage supply companies in the United Kingdom that actively embrace sustainability practices. Data were collected via survey questionnaires using 5-point Likert scales, measuring organizational sustainability, employee engagement, job satisfaction, and corporate communication levels. The findings indicate that social and managerial dimensions of sustainability are the strongest predictors of employee engagement, while environmental and economic sustainability practices significantly enhance job satisfaction. Cultural sustainability showed a meaningful association with employee engagement but only a weak correlation with job satisfaction, suggesting its effects may manifest in the longer term. Furthermore, corporate communication was found to significantly mediate the relationship between sustainability practices and both employee engagement and job satisfaction. The findings reveal that communication is a decisive factor in ensuring that sustainability strategies are understood, embraced, and internalized by employees. This indicates that internal communication processes do not merely serve the function of information transfer but also play a role in fostering trust, a sense of belonging, and shared purpose. The results of the study emphasize that the long-term success of sustainability initiatives is achievable through active employee engagement and robust internal communication systems. Accordingly, it is recommended that organizations integrate human-centric sustainability practices into their corporate culture and strengthen their internal communication mechanisms.

References

  • Adeel, M., Mahmood, S., Khan, K.I, & Saleem, S. (2022). Green HR practices and environmental performance: The mediating mechanism of employee outcomes and moderating role of environmental values. Frontiers in Environmental Science, 10, Article 1001100. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2022.1001100
  • Akbayır, Z. (2019). Halkla ilişkiler perspektifinden kurumsal sürdürülebilirlik iletişimi ve bir örnek olay incelemesi. Uluslararası Halkla İlişkiler ve Reklam Çalışmaları Dergisi, 2(1), 39-71.
  • Aslan, M., & Yaman, F. (2021). Kurumsal değerler olarak kalite, inovasyon, katılımcılık ve işbirliğinin kişi-örgüt uyumu bağlamında çalışanın görev performansına etkisi: Konaklama sektöründe bir araştırma. İşletme Araştırmaları Dergisi, 13(1), 892-903. https://doi.org/10.20491/isarder.2021.1172
  • Avery, G.C., & Bergsteiner, H. (2011). Sustainable Leadership: Honeybee and Locust Approaches. New York: Routledge.
  • Bahadır, E. C., & Gürbüz, A. O. (2023). Sürdürülebilir kalkınmadan kurumsal sürdürülebilirliğe: Teorik değerlendirme. International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Management Inquiries, 7(12), 131-141. https://doi.org/10.55775/ijemi.1328465
  • Brammer, S., Millington, A., & Rayton, B. (2007). The contribution of corporate social responsibility to organizational commitment. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 18(10), 1701-1719. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585190701570866
  • Cornelissen, J. (2011). Corporate Communication: A Guide to Theory and Practice (3rd ed.). London: SAGE Publications.
  • Cortado, F. J., & Chalmeta, R. (2016). Use of social networks as a CSR communication tool. Cogent Business & Management, 3(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2016.1187783
  • Çalışkan, G. Ç. (2024). Çalışanlar anlamı nerede arıyor? Çalışanların beklentileri ve iş tatmini araştırması. HRdergi. Erişim Adresi: https://hrdergi.com/calisanlar-anlami-nerede-ariyor-calisanlarin-beklentileri-ve-is-tatmini-arastirmasi
  • Çemrek, F., & Bayraç, H. N. (2013). Sürdürülebilir kalkınma skorunun hesaplanması. Eskişehir Osmangazi Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 14(2), 131-152.
  • Dalgıç Turhan, G., Özen, T., & Albayrak, R. S. (2018). Kurumsal sürdürülebilirlik kavramı, stratejik önemi ve sürdürülebilirlik performansı ölçümü: Literatür çalışması. Ege Stratejik Araştırmalar Dergisi, 9(1), 17-37. https://doi.org/10.18354/esam.304155
  • De Jong, M. D. T., Harkink, K. M., & Barth, S. (2017). Making green stuff? Effects of corporate greenwashing on consumers. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 32(1), 77-112. https://doi.org/10.1177/1050651917729863
  • Deepalakshmi, N., Tiwari, D., Baruah, R., Seth, A., & Bisht, R. (2024). Employee engagement and organizational performance: A human resource perspective. Educational Administration: Theory and Practice, 30(4), 5941-5948. https://doi.org/10.53555/kuey.v30i4.2323
  • Dillard, J., Dujon, V., & King, M. C. (2009). Understanding the Social Dimension of Sustainability. New York: Routledge.
  • Dong, E., Sun, R., & Lee, Y. (2024). Linking interacting/engaging environmental CSR communication strategy and employees’ pro-environmental behaviors (PEBs): Mediating roles of communal relationship and employee empowerment. Corporate Communications: An International Journal, 29(3), 451-472. https://doi.org/10.1108/CCIJ-05-2023-0068
  • Eccles, R. G., Ioannou, I., & Serafeim, G. (2014). The impact of corporate sustainability on organizational processes and performance. Management Science, 60(11), 2835-2857. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2014.1984
  • Edmans, A. (2011). Does the stock market fully value intangibles? Employee satisfaction and equity prices. Journal of Financial Economics, 101(3), 621-640. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2011.03.021
  • Ehnert, I., Parsa, S., Roper, I., Wagner, M., & Muller-Camen, M. (2015). Reporting on sustainability and HRM: a comparative study of sustainability reporting practices by the world’s largest companies. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 27(1), 88-108. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2015.1024157
  • Elkington, J. (1997). Cannibals with Forks: The Triple Bottom Line of 21st Century Business. Capstone Publishing.
  • Faeni, D. P., Oktaviani, R. F., Riyadh, H. A., Faeni, R. P., & Beshr, B. A. H. (2025). Green human resource management and sustainable practices on corporate reputation and employee well-being: A model for Indonesia’s F&B industry. Environmental Challenges, 18, 101082. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envc.2025.101082
  • Fernando, S., & Lawrence, S. (2014). A theoretical framework for CSR practices: Integrating legitimacy theory, stakeholder theory and institutional theory. The Journal of Theoretical Accounting Research, 10(1), 149-178.
  • Gavriluța, N., Grecu, S.-P., & Chiriac, H. C. (2022). Sustainability and Employability in the Time of COVID-19. Youth, Education and Entrepreneurship in EU Countries. Sustainability, 14(3), 1589. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14031589
  • Glavas, A. (2016). Corporate social responsibility and employee engagement: Enabling employees to employ more of their whole selves at work. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 796. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00796
  • Gross, R. (2011). Corporate social responsibility and employee engagement: Making the connection. Mandrake/CR Strategies.
  • Gündüz, M., & Gündüz, M. (2025). Kurumsal sürdürülebilirlik ve firma performansı: Türkiye örneği. Ekonomi, Politika ve Finans Araştırmaları Dergisi, 10(3), 1245-1262. https://doi.org/10.30784/epfad.1640643
  • Herzberg, F. (1966). Work and the Nature of Man. World Publishing Company.
  • Hopkins, K. D., & Weeks, D. L. (1990). Tests for normality and measures of skewness and kurtosis: Their place in research reporting. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 50(4), 717-729. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164490504001
  • Ivory, S.B., & Alexander, A. (2018). Sustainability’s missing dimension: Defining economic sustainability at organizational and societal levels. ANZAM 2017 Conference Proceedings. https://www.anzam.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/02/ANZAM-2017-117.pdf
  • Kahn, W. A. (1990). Psychological conditions of personal engagement and disengagement at work. Academy of Management Journal, 33(4), 692-724.
  • Kahnweiler, W. M., & Thompson, M. A. (2000). Levels of desired, actual, and perceived control of employee involvement in decision making: An empirical investigation. Journal of Business and Psychology, 14(3), 407-427. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022976132361
  • Karabıçak, M., & Özdemir, M. B. (2015). Sürdürülebilir kalkınmanın kavramsal temelleri. Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi Vizyoner Dergisi, 6(13), 44-49.
  • Karakuş, G. (2025). Yeşil insan kaynakları yönetiminin çalışan performansı ve çalışanın yeşil davranışı üzerindeki etkisinde yeşil örgütsel desteğin aracılık rolü. İşletme Araştırmaları Dergisi, 17(1), 373-389. https://doi.org/10.20491/isarder.2025.1977
  • Kesen, M. (2016). İşletme yönetiminde sürdürülebilir insan kaynakları yönetiminin yeri ve önemi. İnsan ve Toplum Bilimleri Araştırmaları Dergisi, 5(3), 554-573.
  • Kim, H. L., Rhou, Y., Uysal, M., & Kwon, N. (2017). An examination of the links between corporate social responsibility (CSR) and its internal consequences. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 61, 26-34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2016.10.011
  • Kim, Y. J., Kim, W. G., Choi, H. M., & Phetvaroon, K. (2017). The effect of green human resource management on hotel employees’ eco-friendly behavior and environmental performance. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 76(Part A), 83-93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2018.04.007
  • Köse, M., & Yüksel Nalbantoğlu, S. (2021). Sürdürülebilir insan kaynakları yönetimi için çalışan deneyimi uygulamaları. Business, Economics and Management Research Journal, 4(2), 70-80.
  • Kuşat, N. (2012). Sürdürülebilir işletmeler için kurumsal sürdürülebilirlik ve içsel unsurları. Afyon Kocatepe Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 14(2), 227-242.
  • Lauring, J., & Thomsen, C. (2009). Collective ideals and practices in sustainable development: Managing corporate identity. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 16(1), 38-47. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.181
  • Locke, E. A. (1976). The nature and causes of job satisfaction. In M. D. Dunnette (Ed.). Handbook of Industrial and Organizational Psychology (pp. 1297-1349). Rand McNally.
  • Lozano, R. (2015). A holistic perspective on corporate sustainability drivers. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 22(1), 32-44. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1325
  • Mees, A., & Bonham, J. (2004, April 4). Corporate social responsibility belongs with HR. Canadian HR Reporter. Erişim Adresi: https://www.hrreporter.com/news/hr-news/corporate-social-responsibility-belongs-with-hr/309882
  • Men, L. R., & Stacks, D. W. (2013). The impact of leadership style and employee empowerment on perceived organizational reputation. Journal of Communication Management, 17(2), 171-192. https://doi.org/10.1108/13632541311318765
  • Morsing, M., & Schultz, M. (2006). Corporate social responsibility communication: Stakeholder information, response and involvement strategies. Business Ethics: A European Review, 15(4), 323-338. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8608.2006.00460.x
  • Nguyen, C. M. A., & Ha, M. T. (2023). The interplay between internal communication, employee engagement, job satisfaction, and employee loyalty in higher education institutions in Vietnam. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 10, 329. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-023-01806-8
  • Özgen, E. (2022). Sürdürülebilirlik iletişimi ve halkla ilişkiler. Türkiye İletişim Araştırmaları Dergisi, (39), 1-4. https://doi.org/10.17829/TURCOM.1106292
  • Özgül, B., Bozkurt, S. ve Gürol, Y. (2020). Sürdürülebilirlik perspektifinden insan kaynakları uygulamalarının incelenmesi: Görgül bir çalışma. Istanbul Business Research, 49(1), 117-145. https://doi.org/10.26650/ibr.2020.49.0053
  • Robinson, D., Perryman, S., & Hayday, S. (2004). The Drivers of Employee Engagement Report 408. Institute for Employment Studies, UK.
  • Roscoe, S., Subramanian, N., Jabbour, C. J. C., & Chong, T. (2019). Green human resource management and the enablers of green organisational culture: Enhancing a firm’s environmental performance for sustainable development. Business Strategy and the Environment, 28(5), 737-749. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2277
  • Saydam, Y. (2014). Halkla İlişkiler: Kavram, Kuram, Uygulama. İletişim Yayınları.
  • Sezen-Gültekin, G. & Argon, T. (2020). Development of organizational sustainability scale. Sakarya University Journal of Education, 10(3), 507-531. https://doi.org/10.19126/suje.757529
  • Shaban, O. S., & Barakat, A. (2023). The impact of sustainability reporting on a company’s financial performance: Evidence from the emerging market [Special issue]. Journal of Governance & Regulation, 12(4), 306-314. https://doi.org/10.22495/jgrv12i4siart10
  • Slack, R. E., Corlett, S., & Morris, R. (2015). Exploring employee engagement with (corporate) social responsibility: A social exchange perspective on organizational participation. Journal of Business Ethics, 127(3), 537-548. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-014-2057-3
  • Sökmen, A., & Benk, O. (2020). Dönüşümsel liderlik, kişi-örgüt uyumu ve iş tatmini ilişkisi: Kamu çalışanlarına yönelik araştırma. İşletme Araştırmaları Dergisi, 12(2), 1347-1357. https://doi.org/10.20491/isarder.2020.916
  • Sun, R., Lee, Y., & Dong, E. (2025). Sustainability and internal communication: Leveraging employee green behaviors. Public Relations Review, 51(2), Article 102565. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2025.102565
  • Süzen, E. (2017). Kurumsal sosyal sorumluluk uygulamalarının kurumlara olan katkıları üzerine bir uygulama. International Journal of Academic Value Studies (Javstudies), 3(15), 261-269. https://doi.org/10.23929/javs.282
  • Tajfel, H. & Turner, J. C. (1986). The social identity theory of intergroup behavior. In Worchel S., Austin W. G. (Eds.). Psychology of Intergroup Relations (pp. 7-24). Nelson-Hall, Chicago.
  • Tekin, N. (2015). Kurum İçi İletişimin Kurum Kültürüne Etkisi: Bir Kamu Kurumu Uygulaması (Yayımlanmamış yüksek lisans tezi). İstanbul Gelişim Üniversitesi, Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, İstanbul.
  • Usman, M., Ghani, U., Cheng, J., Iqbal, S., & Farid, T. (2021). Does participative leadership matter in employees’ outcomes during COVID-19? Role of leader behavioral integrity. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 646442. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.646442
  • Wang, W., Fu, Y., Qiu, H., Moore, J. H., & Wang, Z. (2017) Corporate social responsibility and employee outcomes: a moderated mediation model of organizational identification and moral identity. Frontiers in Psychology, 1(8), 1906. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01906
  • Wang, X., Hu, W., Ren, M., Liu, Y., & Yu, X. (2025). The role of corporate environmental responsibility in driving sustainability-oriented employee engagement: A moderated mediation model. Sustainability, 17(16), 7199. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17167199
  • Weiss, D. J., Dawis, R. V., & England, G. W. (1967). Manual for the Minnesota Satisfaction Questionnaire. Minnesota Studies in Vocational Rehabilitation, 22, 120.
  • World Commission on Environment and Development. (1987). Our Common Future. Oxford University Press.
  • Yassin, Y., & Beckmann, M. (2024). CSR and employee outcomes: A systematic literature review. Management Review Quarterly, 75, 595-641. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11301-023-00389-7
  • Yaylalı, V. (2023). Kurumsal iletişim alt boyutları, kurumsal sürdürülebilirlik ve kurumsal itibar algısı arasındaki ilişkilerin incelenmesi. Akademik Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi, 10(62), 498-511. http://dx.doi.org/10.29228/SOBIDER.67670

ÖRGÜTSEL SÜRDÜRÜLEBİLİRLİĞİN ÇALIŞAN KATILIMI VE İŞ TATMİNİ ÜZERİNDEKİ ETKİSİ: KURUMSAL İLETİŞİMİN ARACI ROLÜ

Year 2026, Volume: 27 Issue: 1, 304 - 330, 26.01.2026
https://doi.org/10.37880/cumuiibf.1822671

Abstract

Bu çalışma, sürdürülebilir iş uygulamalarının çalışan ilişkileri üzerindeki etkisini ve bu etkileşimde kurumsal iletişimin aracı rolünü incelemektedir. Birleşik Krallık’taki yiyecek ve içecek sektöründe faaliyet gösteren, sürdürülebilirlik uygulamalarını benimsemiş beş şirketten rastgele seçilen 500 çalışan ile nicel bir analiz gerçekleştirilmiştir. Veriler, 5’li Likert ölçeğine dayalı anket formlarıyla toplanmış ve çalışanların örgütsel sürdürülebilirlik, çalışan katılımı ve iş tatmini düzeyleri ile kurumsal iletişim algıları ölçülmüştür. Elde edilen bulgular sosyal ve yönetsel sürdürülebilirlik uygulamalarının çalışan katılımını en güçlü şekilde desteklediğini, çevresel ve ekonomik sürdürülebilirlik uygulamalarının ise iş tatminini anlamlı düzeyde artırdığını göstermektedir. Kültürel sürdürülebilirliğin çalışan katılımıyla ilişkili olmakla birlikte iş tatminiyle zayıf bir ilişki sergilediği gözlemlenmiştir. Ayrıca kurumsal iletişimin sürdürülebilirlik uygulamalarının çalışan katılımı ve iş tatmini üzerindeki etkisinde anlamlı bir aracı role sahip olduğu tespit edilmiştir. Bulgular, iletişimin sürdürülebilirlik stratejilerinin çalışanlar tarafından anlaşılması, benimsenmesi ve içselleştirilmesinde belirleyici bir etken olduğunu ortaya koymaktadır. Bu durum, iç iletişim süreçlerinin sadece bilgi aktarımı görevini yerine getirmediğini, bununla birlikte güven, aidiyet ve ortak amaç duygusu yaratma işlevi de gördüğünü göstermektedir. Araştırmanın sonuçları, sürdürülebilirlik yaklaşımlarının uzun vadeli başarısının çalışanların aktif katılımı ve güçlü iç iletişim sistemleriyle mümkün olduğunu vurgulamaktadır. Bu doğrultuda, işletmelere insan odaklı sürdürülebilirlik uygulamalarını kurumsal kültüre entegre etmeleri ve iç iletişim mekanizmalarını güçlendirmeleri önerilmektedir.

References

  • Adeel, M., Mahmood, S., Khan, K.I, & Saleem, S. (2022). Green HR practices and environmental performance: The mediating mechanism of employee outcomes and moderating role of environmental values. Frontiers in Environmental Science, 10, Article 1001100. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2022.1001100
  • Akbayır, Z. (2019). Halkla ilişkiler perspektifinden kurumsal sürdürülebilirlik iletişimi ve bir örnek olay incelemesi. Uluslararası Halkla İlişkiler ve Reklam Çalışmaları Dergisi, 2(1), 39-71.
  • Aslan, M., & Yaman, F. (2021). Kurumsal değerler olarak kalite, inovasyon, katılımcılık ve işbirliğinin kişi-örgüt uyumu bağlamında çalışanın görev performansına etkisi: Konaklama sektöründe bir araştırma. İşletme Araştırmaları Dergisi, 13(1), 892-903. https://doi.org/10.20491/isarder.2021.1172
  • Avery, G.C., & Bergsteiner, H. (2011). Sustainable Leadership: Honeybee and Locust Approaches. New York: Routledge.
  • Bahadır, E. C., & Gürbüz, A. O. (2023). Sürdürülebilir kalkınmadan kurumsal sürdürülebilirliğe: Teorik değerlendirme. International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Management Inquiries, 7(12), 131-141. https://doi.org/10.55775/ijemi.1328465
  • Brammer, S., Millington, A., & Rayton, B. (2007). The contribution of corporate social responsibility to organizational commitment. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 18(10), 1701-1719. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585190701570866
  • Cornelissen, J. (2011). Corporate Communication: A Guide to Theory and Practice (3rd ed.). London: SAGE Publications.
  • Cortado, F. J., & Chalmeta, R. (2016). Use of social networks as a CSR communication tool. Cogent Business & Management, 3(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2016.1187783
  • Çalışkan, G. Ç. (2024). Çalışanlar anlamı nerede arıyor? Çalışanların beklentileri ve iş tatmini araştırması. HRdergi. Erişim Adresi: https://hrdergi.com/calisanlar-anlami-nerede-ariyor-calisanlarin-beklentileri-ve-is-tatmini-arastirmasi
  • Çemrek, F., & Bayraç, H. N. (2013). Sürdürülebilir kalkınma skorunun hesaplanması. Eskişehir Osmangazi Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 14(2), 131-152.
  • Dalgıç Turhan, G., Özen, T., & Albayrak, R. S. (2018). Kurumsal sürdürülebilirlik kavramı, stratejik önemi ve sürdürülebilirlik performansı ölçümü: Literatür çalışması. Ege Stratejik Araştırmalar Dergisi, 9(1), 17-37. https://doi.org/10.18354/esam.304155
  • De Jong, M. D. T., Harkink, K. M., & Barth, S. (2017). Making green stuff? Effects of corporate greenwashing on consumers. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 32(1), 77-112. https://doi.org/10.1177/1050651917729863
  • Deepalakshmi, N., Tiwari, D., Baruah, R., Seth, A., & Bisht, R. (2024). Employee engagement and organizational performance: A human resource perspective. Educational Administration: Theory and Practice, 30(4), 5941-5948. https://doi.org/10.53555/kuey.v30i4.2323
  • Dillard, J., Dujon, V., & King, M. C. (2009). Understanding the Social Dimension of Sustainability. New York: Routledge.
  • Dong, E., Sun, R., & Lee, Y. (2024). Linking interacting/engaging environmental CSR communication strategy and employees’ pro-environmental behaviors (PEBs): Mediating roles of communal relationship and employee empowerment. Corporate Communications: An International Journal, 29(3), 451-472. https://doi.org/10.1108/CCIJ-05-2023-0068
  • Eccles, R. G., Ioannou, I., & Serafeim, G. (2014). The impact of corporate sustainability on organizational processes and performance. Management Science, 60(11), 2835-2857. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2014.1984
  • Edmans, A. (2011). Does the stock market fully value intangibles? Employee satisfaction and equity prices. Journal of Financial Economics, 101(3), 621-640. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2011.03.021
  • Ehnert, I., Parsa, S., Roper, I., Wagner, M., & Muller-Camen, M. (2015). Reporting on sustainability and HRM: a comparative study of sustainability reporting practices by the world’s largest companies. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 27(1), 88-108. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2015.1024157
  • Elkington, J. (1997). Cannibals with Forks: The Triple Bottom Line of 21st Century Business. Capstone Publishing.
  • Faeni, D. P., Oktaviani, R. F., Riyadh, H. A., Faeni, R. P., & Beshr, B. A. H. (2025). Green human resource management and sustainable practices on corporate reputation and employee well-being: A model for Indonesia’s F&B industry. Environmental Challenges, 18, 101082. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envc.2025.101082
  • Fernando, S., & Lawrence, S. (2014). A theoretical framework for CSR practices: Integrating legitimacy theory, stakeholder theory and institutional theory. The Journal of Theoretical Accounting Research, 10(1), 149-178.
  • Gavriluța, N., Grecu, S.-P., & Chiriac, H. C. (2022). Sustainability and Employability in the Time of COVID-19. Youth, Education and Entrepreneurship in EU Countries. Sustainability, 14(3), 1589. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14031589
  • Glavas, A. (2016). Corporate social responsibility and employee engagement: Enabling employees to employ more of their whole selves at work. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 796. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00796
  • Gross, R. (2011). Corporate social responsibility and employee engagement: Making the connection. Mandrake/CR Strategies.
  • Gündüz, M., & Gündüz, M. (2025). Kurumsal sürdürülebilirlik ve firma performansı: Türkiye örneği. Ekonomi, Politika ve Finans Araştırmaları Dergisi, 10(3), 1245-1262. https://doi.org/10.30784/epfad.1640643
  • Herzberg, F. (1966). Work and the Nature of Man. World Publishing Company.
  • Hopkins, K. D., & Weeks, D. L. (1990). Tests for normality and measures of skewness and kurtosis: Their place in research reporting. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 50(4), 717-729. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164490504001
  • Ivory, S.B., & Alexander, A. (2018). Sustainability’s missing dimension: Defining economic sustainability at organizational and societal levels. ANZAM 2017 Conference Proceedings. https://www.anzam.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/02/ANZAM-2017-117.pdf
  • Kahn, W. A. (1990). Psychological conditions of personal engagement and disengagement at work. Academy of Management Journal, 33(4), 692-724.
  • Kahnweiler, W. M., & Thompson, M. A. (2000). Levels of desired, actual, and perceived control of employee involvement in decision making: An empirical investigation. Journal of Business and Psychology, 14(3), 407-427. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022976132361
  • Karabıçak, M., & Özdemir, M. B. (2015). Sürdürülebilir kalkınmanın kavramsal temelleri. Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi Vizyoner Dergisi, 6(13), 44-49.
  • Karakuş, G. (2025). Yeşil insan kaynakları yönetiminin çalışan performansı ve çalışanın yeşil davranışı üzerindeki etkisinde yeşil örgütsel desteğin aracılık rolü. İşletme Araştırmaları Dergisi, 17(1), 373-389. https://doi.org/10.20491/isarder.2025.1977
  • Kesen, M. (2016). İşletme yönetiminde sürdürülebilir insan kaynakları yönetiminin yeri ve önemi. İnsan ve Toplum Bilimleri Araştırmaları Dergisi, 5(3), 554-573.
  • Kim, H. L., Rhou, Y., Uysal, M., & Kwon, N. (2017). An examination of the links between corporate social responsibility (CSR) and its internal consequences. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 61, 26-34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2016.10.011
  • Kim, Y. J., Kim, W. G., Choi, H. M., & Phetvaroon, K. (2017). The effect of green human resource management on hotel employees’ eco-friendly behavior and environmental performance. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 76(Part A), 83-93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2018.04.007
  • Köse, M., & Yüksel Nalbantoğlu, S. (2021). Sürdürülebilir insan kaynakları yönetimi için çalışan deneyimi uygulamaları. Business, Economics and Management Research Journal, 4(2), 70-80.
  • Kuşat, N. (2012). Sürdürülebilir işletmeler için kurumsal sürdürülebilirlik ve içsel unsurları. Afyon Kocatepe Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 14(2), 227-242.
  • Lauring, J., & Thomsen, C. (2009). Collective ideals and practices in sustainable development: Managing corporate identity. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 16(1), 38-47. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.181
  • Locke, E. A. (1976). The nature and causes of job satisfaction. In M. D. Dunnette (Ed.). Handbook of Industrial and Organizational Psychology (pp. 1297-1349). Rand McNally.
  • Lozano, R. (2015). A holistic perspective on corporate sustainability drivers. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 22(1), 32-44. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1325
  • Mees, A., & Bonham, J. (2004, April 4). Corporate social responsibility belongs with HR. Canadian HR Reporter. Erişim Adresi: https://www.hrreporter.com/news/hr-news/corporate-social-responsibility-belongs-with-hr/309882
  • Men, L. R., & Stacks, D. W. (2013). The impact of leadership style and employee empowerment on perceived organizational reputation. Journal of Communication Management, 17(2), 171-192. https://doi.org/10.1108/13632541311318765
  • Morsing, M., & Schultz, M. (2006). Corporate social responsibility communication: Stakeholder information, response and involvement strategies. Business Ethics: A European Review, 15(4), 323-338. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8608.2006.00460.x
  • Nguyen, C. M. A., & Ha, M. T. (2023). The interplay between internal communication, employee engagement, job satisfaction, and employee loyalty in higher education institutions in Vietnam. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 10, 329. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-023-01806-8
  • Özgen, E. (2022). Sürdürülebilirlik iletişimi ve halkla ilişkiler. Türkiye İletişim Araştırmaları Dergisi, (39), 1-4. https://doi.org/10.17829/TURCOM.1106292
  • Özgül, B., Bozkurt, S. ve Gürol, Y. (2020). Sürdürülebilirlik perspektifinden insan kaynakları uygulamalarının incelenmesi: Görgül bir çalışma. Istanbul Business Research, 49(1), 117-145. https://doi.org/10.26650/ibr.2020.49.0053
  • Robinson, D., Perryman, S., & Hayday, S. (2004). The Drivers of Employee Engagement Report 408. Institute for Employment Studies, UK.
  • Roscoe, S., Subramanian, N., Jabbour, C. J. C., & Chong, T. (2019). Green human resource management and the enablers of green organisational culture: Enhancing a firm’s environmental performance for sustainable development. Business Strategy and the Environment, 28(5), 737-749. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2277
  • Saydam, Y. (2014). Halkla İlişkiler: Kavram, Kuram, Uygulama. İletişim Yayınları.
  • Sezen-Gültekin, G. & Argon, T. (2020). Development of organizational sustainability scale. Sakarya University Journal of Education, 10(3), 507-531. https://doi.org/10.19126/suje.757529
  • Shaban, O. S., & Barakat, A. (2023). The impact of sustainability reporting on a company’s financial performance: Evidence from the emerging market [Special issue]. Journal of Governance & Regulation, 12(4), 306-314. https://doi.org/10.22495/jgrv12i4siart10
  • Slack, R. E., Corlett, S., & Morris, R. (2015). Exploring employee engagement with (corporate) social responsibility: A social exchange perspective on organizational participation. Journal of Business Ethics, 127(3), 537-548. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-014-2057-3
  • Sökmen, A., & Benk, O. (2020). Dönüşümsel liderlik, kişi-örgüt uyumu ve iş tatmini ilişkisi: Kamu çalışanlarına yönelik araştırma. İşletme Araştırmaları Dergisi, 12(2), 1347-1357. https://doi.org/10.20491/isarder.2020.916
  • Sun, R., Lee, Y., & Dong, E. (2025). Sustainability and internal communication: Leveraging employee green behaviors. Public Relations Review, 51(2), Article 102565. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2025.102565
  • Süzen, E. (2017). Kurumsal sosyal sorumluluk uygulamalarının kurumlara olan katkıları üzerine bir uygulama. International Journal of Academic Value Studies (Javstudies), 3(15), 261-269. https://doi.org/10.23929/javs.282
  • Tajfel, H. & Turner, J. C. (1986). The social identity theory of intergroup behavior. In Worchel S., Austin W. G. (Eds.). Psychology of Intergroup Relations (pp. 7-24). Nelson-Hall, Chicago.
  • Tekin, N. (2015). Kurum İçi İletişimin Kurum Kültürüne Etkisi: Bir Kamu Kurumu Uygulaması (Yayımlanmamış yüksek lisans tezi). İstanbul Gelişim Üniversitesi, Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, İstanbul.
  • Usman, M., Ghani, U., Cheng, J., Iqbal, S., & Farid, T. (2021). Does participative leadership matter in employees’ outcomes during COVID-19? Role of leader behavioral integrity. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 646442. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.646442
  • Wang, W., Fu, Y., Qiu, H., Moore, J. H., & Wang, Z. (2017) Corporate social responsibility and employee outcomes: a moderated mediation model of organizational identification and moral identity. Frontiers in Psychology, 1(8), 1906. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01906
  • Wang, X., Hu, W., Ren, M., Liu, Y., & Yu, X. (2025). The role of corporate environmental responsibility in driving sustainability-oriented employee engagement: A moderated mediation model. Sustainability, 17(16), 7199. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17167199
  • Weiss, D. J., Dawis, R. V., & England, G. W. (1967). Manual for the Minnesota Satisfaction Questionnaire. Minnesota Studies in Vocational Rehabilitation, 22, 120.
  • World Commission on Environment and Development. (1987). Our Common Future. Oxford University Press.
  • Yassin, Y., & Beckmann, M. (2024). CSR and employee outcomes: A systematic literature review. Management Review Quarterly, 75, 595-641. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11301-023-00389-7
  • Yaylalı, V. (2023). Kurumsal iletişim alt boyutları, kurumsal sürdürülebilirlik ve kurumsal itibar algısı arasındaki ilişkilerin incelenmesi. Akademik Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi, 10(62), 498-511. http://dx.doi.org/10.29228/SOBIDER.67670
There are 64 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language Turkish
Subjects Business Administration
Journal Section Research Article
Authors

Ali Eren Balıkel 0000-0002-9739-9729

Submission Date November 12, 2025
Acceptance Date January 22, 2026
Publication Date January 26, 2026
Published in Issue Year 2026 Volume: 27 Issue: 1

Cite

APA Balıkel, A. E. (2026). ÖRGÜTSEL SÜRDÜRÜLEBİLİRLİĞİN ÇALIŞAN KATILIMI VE İŞ TATMİNİ ÜZERİNDEKİ ETKİSİ: KURUMSAL İLETİŞİMİN ARACI ROLÜ. Cumhuriyet Üniversitesi İktisadi Ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi, 27(1), 304-330. https://doi.org/10.37880/cumuiibf.1822671

Cumhuriyet University Journal of Economics and Administrative Sciences is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY NC).