Abstract
Bu çalışmada Avrupa Birliği üyesi 28 ülkenin 2016 ve 2018 yıllarındaki döngüsel ekonomi performansları karşılaştırılmaktadır. AB üyesi ülkelerin göreli etkinlikleri çıkan sonuçlara göre yorumlanmaktadır. Analiz olarak Veri Zarflama Analiz (VZA) yöntemi kullanılmaktadır. Analiz kapsamında üç girdi ve iki çıktı olmak üzere toplam beş değişken ele alınmaktadır. Analiz sonucunda CCR girdi yönelimli modele göre 2016 yılında döngüsel ekonomi performansı iyi olan ülke sayısı 12 iken 2018 yılında 13 ülke olduğu görülmektedir. BCC modeline göre de 2016 yılında döngüsel ekonomi performansı iyi olan ülkeler 14 iken 2018 yılında 16 ülkenin performansı iyi durumdadır. Bu durum AB üyesi ülkelerde döngüsel ekonomi sürecine yönelik çabaların varlığına işaret etmektedir. Döngüsel ekonomi performanslarına yönelik en kötü skorlara sahip olan ülkelerin sayısı analiz yöntemine göre değişmektir. Ancak genel itibariyle kötü performanslara sahip ülkeler şu şekildedir: Malta, Estonya, Yunanistan, Bulgaristan, Portekiz, İtalya, İspanya, Hırvatistan ve Slovakya’dır. Bu çalışma AB ülkelerinin döngüsel ekonomiye bakış açılarını analiz etmek için ve AB ülkelerinde döngüsel ekonominin gelecekte ne gibi etkileri olabileceğini anlamak için uygundur.
Supporting Institution
Yok
Project Number
Yok
References
- Al-Saidi, M., Das, P. & Saadaoui, I. (2021). Circular Economy in Basic Supply: Framing the Approach for the Water and Food Sectors of the Gulf Cooperation Council Countries. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 27, 1273-1285. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2021.03.004
- Banker, R., Charnes, A., & Cooper, W. (1984). Some models for estimating technical and scale inefficiencies in data envelopment analysis. Management Science, 30(9), 1078-1092.
- Boussofiane, A., Dyson, R., & Thanassoulis, E. (1991). Applied data envelopment analysis. European Journal of Operational Research, 52(1), 1-15. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-2217(91)90331-O
- Charnes, A., Cooper, W., & Rhodes, E. (1978). Measuring the efficiency of decision making units. European Journal of Operational Research, 2(6), 429-444. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-2217(78)90138-8
- European Commission. (2021, 04 15). Questions and Answers on the United Kingdom's withdrawal from the European Union on 31 January 2020. 15.05.2021 tarihinde https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/qanda_20_104 adresinden alındı.
- European Commision. (2020). A New Circular Economy Action Plan: For a Cleaner and More Competitive Europe. 12.05.2021 tarihinde https://eur-lex.europa.eu/: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?qid=1583933814386&uri=COM:2020:98:FIN adresinden alındı.
- European Commission. (2019). Circular Economy in the EU: Record Recycling rRes and Use of Recycled Materials in the EU. 12.05.2021 tarihinde https://ec.europa.eu/: https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/documents/2995521/9629294/8-04032019-BP-EN.pdf/295c2302-4ed1-45b9-af86-96d1bbb7acb1 adresinden alındı.
- European Commission. (2015). Closing the Loop: An EU action Plan for the Circular Economy. 12.05.2021 tarihinde https://eur-lex.europa.eu/: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:52015DC0614 adresinden alındı.
- European Commission. (2014). Towards a Circular Economy: A Zero Waste Programme for Europe. 12.05.2021 tarihinde https://eur-lex.europa.eu/: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=celex%3A52014DC0398 adresinden alındı.
- European Commission. (ty). First Circular Economy Action Plan. 12.05. 2021 tarihinde https://ec.europa.eu/: https://ec.europa.eu/environment/topics/circular-economy/first-circular-economy-action-plan_en adresinden alındı.
- Farrell, M. (1957). The Measurement of Productive Efficiency. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, 120(3), 253-290. doi:https://doi.org/10.2307/2343100
- Fura, B., Stec, M. & Mis, T.(2020). Statistical Evaluation of the Level of Development of Circular Economy in European Union Member Countries. Energies, 13, 2-23. doi: 10.3390/en13236401
- Giannakitsidou, O., Giannikos, I. & Chondrou, A. (2020). Ranking European Countries on the Basis of their Environmental and Circular Economy Performance: A DEA Application in MSW. Waste Management, 109, 181-191. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2020.04.055
- Hobson, K. (2016). Closing the Loop or Squaring the Circle? Locating Generative Spaces for the Circular Economy. Progress in Human Geography, 40(1), 88-104. doi: 10.1177/0309132514566342
- Hobson, K. & Lynch, N. (2016). Diversifying and De-growing the Circular Economy: Radical Social Transformation in a Resource-Scarce World. Futures, 82, 15-25. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2016.05.012
- Kirchherr, J., Reike, D. & Hekkert, M. (2017). Conceptualizing the Circular Economy: An Analysis of 114 Definitions. Resources, Conservation & Recycling, 127, 221-232. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2017.09.005
- Marino, A. & Pariso, P. (2020). Comparing European Countries' Performances in the Transition towards the Circular Economy. Science of the Total Environment, 729, 1-12. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.138142
- Martinez, J. D. (2021). An Overview of the End-of-Life Tires Status in Some Latin American Countries: Proposing Pyrolysis for a Circular Economy. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 144, 1-12. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2021.111032
- Robaina, M., Murillo, K., Rocha E.& Villar, J.(2020). Circular Economy in Plastic Waste - Efficiency Analysis of European Countries. Science of the Total Environment, 730, 1-12. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.139038
- Su, B., Heshmati, A., Geng, Y. & Yu, X. (2013). A Review of the Circular Economy in China: Moving from Rhetoric to Implementation. Journal of Cleaner Production, 43, 215-227. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.11.020
- Wu, C., Hu, M. & Ni, F. (2021). Supporting a Circular Economy: Insights from Taiwan’s Plastic Waste sector and Lessons for Developing Countries. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 26, 228-238. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2020.10.009
Abstract
In this study, the circular economy performances of 28 European Union member countries in 2016 and 2018 are compared. The relative efficiency of EU member states is interpreted according to the results. As the analysis, Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) method is used. Within the scope of the analysis, a total of five variables, three inputs and two outputs, are considered. As a result of the analysis, according to the CCR input-oriented model, while the number of countries with good circular economy performance was 12 in 2016, it is seen that there are 13 countries in 2018. According to the BCC model, while 14 countries had good circular economy performance in 2016, 16 countries performed well in 2018. This indicates the existence of efforts towards the circular economy process in EU member states. The number of countries with the worst scores for circular economy performances varies according to the analysis method. However, the countries with poor performance in general are as follows: Malta, Estonia, Greece, Bulgaria, Portugal, Italy, Spain, Croatia and Slovakia. This study is appropriate to analyze the perspectives of EU countries on circular economy and to understand what effects the circular economy might have in the future in EU countries.
Project Number
Yok
References
- Al-Saidi, M., Das, P. & Saadaoui, I. (2021). Circular Economy in Basic Supply: Framing the Approach for the Water and Food Sectors of the Gulf Cooperation Council Countries. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 27, 1273-1285. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2021.03.004
- Banker, R., Charnes, A., & Cooper, W. (1984). Some models for estimating technical and scale inefficiencies in data envelopment analysis. Management Science, 30(9), 1078-1092.
- Boussofiane, A., Dyson, R., & Thanassoulis, E. (1991). Applied data envelopment analysis. European Journal of Operational Research, 52(1), 1-15. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-2217(91)90331-O
- Charnes, A., Cooper, W., & Rhodes, E. (1978). Measuring the efficiency of decision making units. European Journal of Operational Research, 2(6), 429-444. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-2217(78)90138-8
- European Commission. (2021, 04 15). Questions and Answers on the United Kingdom's withdrawal from the European Union on 31 January 2020. 15.05.2021 tarihinde https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/qanda_20_104 adresinden alındı.
- European Commision. (2020). A New Circular Economy Action Plan: For a Cleaner and More Competitive Europe. 12.05.2021 tarihinde https://eur-lex.europa.eu/: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?qid=1583933814386&uri=COM:2020:98:FIN adresinden alındı.
- European Commission. (2019). Circular Economy in the EU: Record Recycling rRes and Use of Recycled Materials in the EU. 12.05.2021 tarihinde https://ec.europa.eu/: https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/documents/2995521/9629294/8-04032019-BP-EN.pdf/295c2302-4ed1-45b9-af86-96d1bbb7acb1 adresinden alındı.
- European Commission. (2015). Closing the Loop: An EU action Plan for the Circular Economy. 12.05.2021 tarihinde https://eur-lex.europa.eu/: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:52015DC0614 adresinden alındı.
- European Commission. (2014). Towards a Circular Economy: A Zero Waste Programme for Europe. 12.05.2021 tarihinde https://eur-lex.europa.eu/: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=celex%3A52014DC0398 adresinden alındı.
- European Commission. (ty). First Circular Economy Action Plan. 12.05. 2021 tarihinde https://ec.europa.eu/: https://ec.europa.eu/environment/topics/circular-economy/first-circular-economy-action-plan_en adresinden alındı.
- Farrell, M. (1957). The Measurement of Productive Efficiency. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, 120(3), 253-290. doi:https://doi.org/10.2307/2343100
- Fura, B., Stec, M. & Mis, T.(2020). Statistical Evaluation of the Level of Development of Circular Economy in European Union Member Countries. Energies, 13, 2-23. doi: 10.3390/en13236401
- Giannakitsidou, O., Giannikos, I. & Chondrou, A. (2020). Ranking European Countries on the Basis of their Environmental and Circular Economy Performance: A DEA Application in MSW. Waste Management, 109, 181-191. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2020.04.055
- Hobson, K. (2016). Closing the Loop or Squaring the Circle? Locating Generative Spaces for the Circular Economy. Progress in Human Geography, 40(1), 88-104. doi: 10.1177/0309132514566342
- Hobson, K. & Lynch, N. (2016). Diversifying and De-growing the Circular Economy: Radical Social Transformation in a Resource-Scarce World. Futures, 82, 15-25. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2016.05.012
- Kirchherr, J., Reike, D. & Hekkert, M. (2017). Conceptualizing the Circular Economy: An Analysis of 114 Definitions. Resources, Conservation & Recycling, 127, 221-232. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2017.09.005
- Marino, A. & Pariso, P. (2020). Comparing European Countries' Performances in the Transition towards the Circular Economy. Science of the Total Environment, 729, 1-12. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.138142
- Martinez, J. D. (2021). An Overview of the End-of-Life Tires Status in Some Latin American Countries: Proposing Pyrolysis for a Circular Economy. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 144, 1-12. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2021.111032
- Robaina, M., Murillo, K., Rocha E.& Villar, J.(2020). Circular Economy in Plastic Waste - Efficiency Analysis of European Countries. Science of the Total Environment, 730, 1-12. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.139038
- Su, B., Heshmati, A., Geng, Y. & Yu, X. (2013). A Review of the Circular Economy in China: Moving from Rhetoric to Implementation. Journal of Cleaner Production, 43, 215-227. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.11.020
- Wu, C., Hu, M. & Ni, F. (2021). Supporting a Circular Economy: Insights from Taiwan’s Plastic Waste sector and Lessons for Developing Countries. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 26, 228-238. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2020.10.009
Details
| Primary Language | Turkish |
|---|---|
| Subjects | Economics |
| Journal Section | Makaleler |
| Authors | |
| Project Number | Yok |
| Publication Date | January 14, 2022 |
| Submission Date | September 8, 2021 |
| Published in Issue | Year 2022 |
Cited By
EN BÜYÜK PLASTİK TÜKETİCİSİ OLAN ÇİN’DE PLASTİK TÜKETİMİ, KARBON EMİSYONU VE SAĞLIK HARCAMASI İLİŞKİSİ
Anadolu Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi
https://doi.org/10.53443/anadoluibfd.1367925
Döngüsel Ekonomi Bileşenlerinin Ekolojik Ayak İzi Üzerindeki Etkisi: Panel Veri Analizi
Uluslararası Ekonomi, İşletme ve Politika Dergisi
https://doi.org/10.29216/ueip.1425770
Cumhuriyet Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi Creative Commons Atıf-GayriTicari 4.0 Uluslararası Lisansı (CC BY NC) ile lisanslanmıştır.