Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite

RESEARCH, INNOVATION AND PRODUCTIVITY: AN ECONOMETRIC ANALYSIS AT THE MANUFACTURING SECTOR IN TURKEY

Year 2018, Volume: 19 Issue: 2, 44 - 56, 30.11.2018

Abstract

References

  • AGHION, Philippe; Nick BLOOM, Richard BLUNDELL, Rachel, GRIFFITH and Peter HOWITT (2005), “Competition And Innovation: An Inverted –U Relationship”, The Quarterly Journal of Economics, Vol.120, No.2, 701-728.
  • AMIN, Mohammad (2015), “Competition and Labor Productivity in India’s Retail Stores”, Journal of Asian Economics, 41, 57-68.
  • APERGİS, Nicholas; Claire ECONOMİDOU and Ioannis FILIPPIDIS (2008), “Innovation, Technology Transfer and Labor Productivity Linkages: Evidence From A Panel of Manufacturing Industries”, Review of World Economics, Vol.144, No.3, 491-508.
  • BAUMANN, Julian and Alexander S. KRITIKOS (2016), “The Link Between R&D, Innovation And Productivity: Are Micro Firms Different?”, Research Policy, 45, 1263-1274.
  • BECKER, Wolfgang and Jürgen DIETZ (2004), “R&D Cooperation And Innovation Activities of Firms Evidence for the German Manufacturing Industry”, Research Policy, 33, 209-223.
  • CHUDNOVSKY, Daniel; Andres LÓPEZ and Germán PUPATO (2006), “Innovation And Productivity in Developing Countries: A Study of Argentine Manufacturing Firms’ Behavior (1992-2001)”, Research Policy, 35, 266-288.
  • CREPÓN, Bruno; Emmanuel DUGUET and Jacques MAIRESSE (1998), “Research, Innavation, And Productivity: An Econometric Analysis at the Firm Leve”, Nber Working Paper Series, No.6696.
  • CRESPI, Gustavo and Pluvia ZUNIGA (2012), “Innovation And Productivity: Evidence from Six Latin American Countries”, World Development, Vol.40, No.2, 273-290.FU, Xiaolan; Pierre MOHNEN and Giacomo ZANELLO (2018), “Innovation and Productivity in Fomal and Informal Firms in Ghana”, Technological Forecasting & Social Change, 131, 315-325.
  • GARZIA- POZO; Marchante-Mera ALEJANDRO, J. ANDRES and Juan Antonio CAMPOS-SORIA (2018), “Innovation, Environment, And Productivity in the Spanish Service Sector: An Implementation of a CDM Structural Model”, Journal of Cleaner Production, 171, 1049-1057.
  • GLOBERMAN, Steven (2000), Linkages Between Technological Change and Productivity Growth, Paper Number 23, Industry Canada Research Publications Program.
  • GRIFFITH, Rachel; Elena HUERGO, Jacques MAIRESSE and Bettina PETERS (2006), “Innovation And Productivity Across Four European Countries”, Oxford Review of Economic Policy, Vol.22, No.4, 483-498.
  • HALL, Bronwyn H.; Francesca LOTTI and Jacques MAIRESSE (2013), “Evidence on the Impact of R&D and ICT Investments on Innovation and Productivity in Italian Firms”, Economics of Innovation and New Technology, Vol.22, No.3, 300-328.
  • HALL, Bronwyn H. and Vania SENA (2017), “Appropriability Mechanisms, Innovation, and Productivity: Evidence from the UK”, Economics of Innovation and New Technology, Vol.26, No.1-2, 42-62.
  • HOWELL, Anthony (2017), “Innovation anf Firm Performance in the People’s Republic of China: A Structural Approach with Spillovers”, Asian Development Bank Institute Working Paper Series, No.805.
  • KIJEK, Tomasz and Arkadiusz KIJEK (2018), “Is Innovation the Key to Solving the Productivity Paradox?”, Journal of Innovation & Knowledge (In Press).KORKMAZ, Suna and Oya KORKMAZ (2017), “The Relationship Between Labor Productivity And Economic Growth in OECD Countries”, International Journal of Economics and Finance, Vol.9, No.5, 71-76.
  • MARADANA, Rana P.; Rudra P. PRADHAN, Saurav DASH, Kunal GAURAV, Manju JAYAKUMAR and Debaleena CHATTERJEE (2017), “Does Innovation Promote Economic Growth? Evidence from European Countries”, Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, (6):1, 1-23.
  • MASSO, Jaan and Priit VAHTER (2008), “Technological Innovation and Productivity in late-transition Estonia: Econometric Evidence from Innovation Surveys”, The European Journal of Development Research, Vol.20, No.2, 240-261.
  • MOHNEN, Pierre and Bronwyn HALL (2013), “Innovation And Productivity: An Update”, Eurasian Business Review, 3(1), 47-65.
  • PETERS, Bettina; Rebecca RILEY, Iulia SIEDSCHLAG, Priit VAHTER and John MCQUINN (2018), “Internationalisation, Innovation and Prductivity in Services: Evidence From Germany, Ireland and the United Kingdom”, Review of World Economics, 154, 585-615.
  • PREENEN, Paul TY; Robert VERGEER, Karolus KRAAN and Steven DHONDT (2017), “Labour Productivity and Innovation Performance: The Importance of Internal Labour Flexibility Practices”, Economic and Industrial Democracy, Vol.38 (2), 271-293. SCHERER, F. M. (1965), “Firm Size, Market Structure, Oppurtunity, and the Output of Patented Inventions”, The American Economic Review, Vol.55, No.5, 1097-1125.
  • SCHERER, F. M. (1967), “Market Structure and the Employment of Scientists and Engineers”, The American Economic Review, Vol.57, No.3, 524-531.
  • SCHMOOKLER, Jacob and Oswald BROWNLEE (1962), “Determinants of Inventive Activity”, The American Economic Review, Vol.52, No.2, 165-176.
  • ULKU, Hulya (2004), “R&D, Innovation, and Economic Growth: An Empirical Analysis”, IMF Working Paper, WP/04/185.
  • YAMADA, Tetsuji; Tadashi YAMADA and Guoen LIU (1991), “Labor Productivity and Market Competition in Japan”, NBER Working Paper, No.3800.

RESEARCH, INNOVATION AND PRODUCTIVITY: AN ECONOMETRIC ANALYSIS AT THE MANUFACTURING SECTOR IN TURKEY

Year 2018, Volume: 19 Issue: 2, 44 - 56, 30.11.2018

Abstract

İşgücü
verimliliğinin üç belirleyicisi vardır. Birincisi insan sermayesi, ikincisi teknolojik
değişim, üçüncüsü ise imalat maliyetlerini azaltan ölçek ekonomisidir. Bu
çalışmada, ikinci faktör, teknolojik değişim, yenilik test edilecektir.
Türkiye'deki yerli patentlerin sayısı, yabancı patent sayısından önemli ölçüde
daha düşüktür. Bu nedenle, yenilikçi ürünler azdır. Ancak, patent sayısı
arttıkça, yenilikçi satışlar artacak ve bu da işgücü verimliliğini
artıracaktır. Yeni inovasyon ve keşifler, yeni ürünlerin ortaya çıkmasına ilham
kaynağı olur ve bu da emek verimliliğini artırır. Bu çalışmada Türkiye'de
imalat sektöründe verimlilik, yenilik ve araştırma arasındaki bağlantıyı
araştırmak için CDM modeli kullanılmıştır. Bu amaçla, Türkiye İstatistik Kurumu
ve Türk Patent ve Marka Ofisi’nden elde edilen; çalışan başına düşen patent
sayısı, Ar-Ge biriminde istihdam edilen personel başına ciro, çalışan başına
katma değer kullanılmaktadır. En son yayınlanan veriler 2015'e ait olduğundan,
2009-2015 yıllarına ait veriler kullanımıştır. Panel verileri kullanılarak
tahmin edilen modele göre, patent sayısındaki artış yenilikçi satışların
artmasına ve yenilikçi satışların artması da işgücü verimliliğinin artmasına
neden olmaktadır.

References

  • AGHION, Philippe; Nick BLOOM, Richard BLUNDELL, Rachel, GRIFFITH and Peter HOWITT (2005), “Competition And Innovation: An Inverted –U Relationship”, The Quarterly Journal of Economics, Vol.120, No.2, 701-728.
  • AMIN, Mohammad (2015), “Competition and Labor Productivity in India’s Retail Stores”, Journal of Asian Economics, 41, 57-68.
  • APERGİS, Nicholas; Claire ECONOMİDOU and Ioannis FILIPPIDIS (2008), “Innovation, Technology Transfer and Labor Productivity Linkages: Evidence From A Panel of Manufacturing Industries”, Review of World Economics, Vol.144, No.3, 491-508.
  • BAUMANN, Julian and Alexander S. KRITIKOS (2016), “The Link Between R&D, Innovation And Productivity: Are Micro Firms Different?”, Research Policy, 45, 1263-1274.
  • BECKER, Wolfgang and Jürgen DIETZ (2004), “R&D Cooperation And Innovation Activities of Firms Evidence for the German Manufacturing Industry”, Research Policy, 33, 209-223.
  • CHUDNOVSKY, Daniel; Andres LÓPEZ and Germán PUPATO (2006), “Innovation And Productivity in Developing Countries: A Study of Argentine Manufacturing Firms’ Behavior (1992-2001)”, Research Policy, 35, 266-288.
  • CREPÓN, Bruno; Emmanuel DUGUET and Jacques MAIRESSE (1998), “Research, Innavation, And Productivity: An Econometric Analysis at the Firm Leve”, Nber Working Paper Series, No.6696.
  • CRESPI, Gustavo and Pluvia ZUNIGA (2012), “Innovation And Productivity: Evidence from Six Latin American Countries”, World Development, Vol.40, No.2, 273-290.FU, Xiaolan; Pierre MOHNEN and Giacomo ZANELLO (2018), “Innovation and Productivity in Fomal and Informal Firms in Ghana”, Technological Forecasting & Social Change, 131, 315-325.
  • GARZIA- POZO; Marchante-Mera ALEJANDRO, J. ANDRES and Juan Antonio CAMPOS-SORIA (2018), “Innovation, Environment, And Productivity in the Spanish Service Sector: An Implementation of a CDM Structural Model”, Journal of Cleaner Production, 171, 1049-1057.
  • GLOBERMAN, Steven (2000), Linkages Between Technological Change and Productivity Growth, Paper Number 23, Industry Canada Research Publications Program.
  • GRIFFITH, Rachel; Elena HUERGO, Jacques MAIRESSE and Bettina PETERS (2006), “Innovation And Productivity Across Four European Countries”, Oxford Review of Economic Policy, Vol.22, No.4, 483-498.
  • HALL, Bronwyn H.; Francesca LOTTI and Jacques MAIRESSE (2013), “Evidence on the Impact of R&D and ICT Investments on Innovation and Productivity in Italian Firms”, Economics of Innovation and New Technology, Vol.22, No.3, 300-328.
  • HALL, Bronwyn H. and Vania SENA (2017), “Appropriability Mechanisms, Innovation, and Productivity: Evidence from the UK”, Economics of Innovation and New Technology, Vol.26, No.1-2, 42-62.
  • HOWELL, Anthony (2017), “Innovation anf Firm Performance in the People’s Republic of China: A Structural Approach with Spillovers”, Asian Development Bank Institute Working Paper Series, No.805.
  • KIJEK, Tomasz and Arkadiusz KIJEK (2018), “Is Innovation the Key to Solving the Productivity Paradox?”, Journal of Innovation & Knowledge (In Press).KORKMAZ, Suna and Oya KORKMAZ (2017), “The Relationship Between Labor Productivity And Economic Growth in OECD Countries”, International Journal of Economics and Finance, Vol.9, No.5, 71-76.
  • MARADANA, Rana P.; Rudra P. PRADHAN, Saurav DASH, Kunal GAURAV, Manju JAYAKUMAR and Debaleena CHATTERJEE (2017), “Does Innovation Promote Economic Growth? Evidence from European Countries”, Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, (6):1, 1-23.
  • MASSO, Jaan and Priit VAHTER (2008), “Technological Innovation and Productivity in late-transition Estonia: Econometric Evidence from Innovation Surveys”, The European Journal of Development Research, Vol.20, No.2, 240-261.
  • MOHNEN, Pierre and Bronwyn HALL (2013), “Innovation And Productivity: An Update”, Eurasian Business Review, 3(1), 47-65.
  • PETERS, Bettina; Rebecca RILEY, Iulia SIEDSCHLAG, Priit VAHTER and John MCQUINN (2018), “Internationalisation, Innovation and Prductivity in Services: Evidence From Germany, Ireland and the United Kingdom”, Review of World Economics, 154, 585-615.
  • PREENEN, Paul TY; Robert VERGEER, Karolus KRAAN and Steven DHONDT (2017), “Labour Productivity and Innovation Performance: The Importance of Internal Labour Flexibility Practices”, Economic and Industrial Democracy, Vol.38 (2), 271-293. SCHERER, F. M. (1965), “Firm Size, Market Structure, Oppurtunity, and the Output of Patented Inventions”, The American Economic Review, Vol.55, No.5, 1097-1125.
  • SCHERER, F. M. (1967), “Market Structure and the Employment of Scientists and Engineers”, The American Economic Review, Vol.57, No.3, 524-531.
  • SCHMOOKLER, Jacob and Oswald BROWNLEE (1962), “Determinants of Inventive Activity”, The American Economic Review, Vol.52, No.2, 165-176.
  • ULKU, Hulya (2004), “R&D, Innovation, and Economic Growth: An Empirical Analysis”, IMF Working Paper, WP/04/185.
  • YAMADA, Tetsuji; Tadashi YAMADA and Guoen LIU (1991), “Labor Productivity and Market Competition in Japan”, NBER Working Paper, No.3800.
There are 24 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language English
Subjects Business Administration
Journal Section Makaleler
Authors

Zeynep Karaca

Publication Date November 30, 2018
Submission Date September 4, 2018
Published in Issue Year 2018Volume: 19 Issue: 2

Cite

APA Karaca, Z. (2018). RESEARCH, INNOVATION AND PRODUCTIVITY: AN ECONOMETRIC ANALYSIS AT THE MANUFACTURING SECTOR IN TURKEY. Cumhuriyet Üniversitesi İktisadi Ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi, 19(2), 44-56.

Cumhuriyet University Journal of Economics and Administrative Sciences is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY NC).