Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite

The Impact of Digitalization Investments on the ESG Scores of Companies in Türkiye: A Panel Quantile Regression Approach

Year 2025, Volume: 26 Issue: 2, 1 - 19, 30.04.2025

Meltem Kılıç , Aydın Gürbüz

Abstract

Digitalization has become a significant area of development globally in recent years. Technological innovations and digital transformation are profoundly influencing businesses' strategic decisions, operational efficiencies, and competitiveness in the market. In addition, digitalization affects not only economic and operational aspects but also environmental, social, and governance (ESG) criteria. ESG has become a key measure for assessing the sustainability performance of companies, and investments focusing on these criteria are increasingly valued by investors and other stakeholders. In this context, the potential impact of digitalization investments on ESG scores has become a subject of interest, particularly in developing economies like Türkiye. This study examines the impact of digitalization investments on ESG scores of companies in Türkiye that published ESG (Environmental, Social, and Governance) scores between 2015 and 2022. The analysis, conducted using panel quantile regression, found that digitalization investments significantly affect the ESG scores of companies in the bottom 10% quantile with low ESG scores. However, no significant effect of digitalization investments on ESG performance was observed in other quantile ranges. This suggests that the impact of digitalization varies for companies at different levels of development, with digitalization investments providing more noticeable benefits for firms with lower ESG performance.

Keywords

Digitalization ESG Sustainability Türkiye Panel quantile regression

References

  • Akyol, H., Akar, T., & Akar, G. (2023). Digitalization and economic growth: New evidence from EU countries. Balıkesir University The Journal of Social Sciences Institute, 26(49), 99-14. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31795/baunsobed.1234251
  • Apergis, N., Poufinas, T. & Antonopoulos, A. (2022). ESG score and cost of debt, Energy Economics, 112, 1-10. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2022.106186
  • Arayssi, M., Jizi, M., & Tabaja, H.H. (2020). The impact of board composition on the level of ESG disclosures in GCC countries. Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal, 11(1), 137-161. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/SAMPJ-05-2018-0136
  • Arif, M. Sajjad, A. Farooq, S. Abrar, M. & Joyo, A.S. (2021). The impact of audit committe attributes on the quality and quantity of environmental, social and governance (ESG) disclosures. Corporate Governance, 21(3), 497-514. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/CG-06-2020-0243
  • Arslan, Z., & Yağcılar, G. G. (2023). Sürdürülebilir finans kapsamında çevresel, sosyal ve kurumsal yönetim (ESG) ile banka karlılığı arasındaki ilişki üzerine uluslararası bir araştırma. Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi Vizyoner Dergisi, 14(40), 1236-1263. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21076/vizyoner.1218886
  • Aydoğmuş, M., Gülay, G., & Ergun, K. (2022). Impact of ESG performance on firm value and profitability. Borsa İstanbul Review, 22, S2, 119-127. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bir.2022.11.006
  • Bigelli, M., Mengoli, S., & Sandri, S. (2023). ESG score, board structure and the impact of the non-financial reporting directive on European firms. Journal of Economics and Business. 127, 1-13. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeconbus.2023.106133
  • Buchinsky, M. (1998). Recent advances in quantile regression models: A practical guideline for empirical research. The Journal of Human Resources. 33(1), 88-126
  • Bloomberg, (2018). Environmental, Social & Governance (ESG) product. https://data.bloomberglp.com/professional/sites/10/1148330431.pdf Erişim tarihi: (03.11.2024).
  • Bloomberg (2023). Bloomberg ESG scores. https://hr.bloombergadria.com/data/files/Pitanja%20i%20odgovori%20o%20Bloomberg%20ESG%20Scoreu.pdf Erişim tarihi: (03.11.2024).
  • Brodny, J. & Tutak, M. (2022). Analyzing the level of digitalization among the enterprises of the European Union member states and their impact on economic growth. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 8(70), 1-29. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/joitmc8020070
  • Cai, C., Tu, Y., & Li, Z. (2023). Enterprise digital transformation and ESG performance. Finance Research Letters, 58, 104692. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2023.104692
  • Camilleri, M. A. (2015). Environmental, social and governance disclosures in Europe. Sustainability Accounting Management and Policy Journal. 6(2), 224-242. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/SAMPJ-10-2014-0065
  • Camodeca, R. & Almici, A. (2021) Digital transformation and convergence toward the 2030 Agenda’s sustainability development goals: Evidence from Italian listed firms. Sustainability, 13(11831) DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su132111831
  • Canarella, G., & Miller, S.M. (2018). The determinants of growth in the U.S. information and communication technology (ICT) industry: A firm-level analysis. Economic Modelling, 70, 259-271. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2017.11.011
  • Clement, A. Robinot, E. & Trespuuch, L. (2023). The use of ESG scores in academic literatüre: a systematic literatüre review. Journal of Enterprising Communities People and Places the Global Economy, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/JEC-10-2022-0147
  • Conyon, M. J. & He, L. (2017). Firm performance and boardroom gender diversity: A quantile regression approach. Journal of Business Research, 79, 198-211. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2017.02.006 Çetenak, E. H., Ersoy, E., & Işık, Ö. (2022). ESG (çevresel, sosyal ve kurumsal yönetim) skorunun firma performansına etkisi: Türk bankacılık sektörü örneği. Erciyes Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, (63), 75-82. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18070/erciyesiibd.1212587
  • Dahlman, C., Mealy, S., & Wermelinger, M. (2016). Harnessing the digital economy for developing countries. OECD Development Centre Working Papers, 334. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1787/4adffb24-en
  • DasGupta, R. (2022). Financial performance shortfall, ESG controversies, and ESG performance: Evidence from firms around the world. Finance Research Letters, 46, Part B, 102487. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2021.102487
  • Daud, S.N.M., & Ahmad, A.H. (2023). Financial inclusion, economic growth and the role of digital technology. Finance Research Letters, 53, 103602. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2022.103602
  • Demirkıran, S. Beyoğlu, A., Terzioğlu, M. K. & Yaşar, A. (2021) Sürdürülebilir kalkınma odaklı dijitalleşme belirleyicilerinin verimlilik üzerindeki etkilerinin yapay sinir ağları ile sınıflandırılması. Verimlilik Dergisi, Özel Sayı, Dijital Dönüşüm ve Verimlilik, 30-47. DOI: https://doi.org/10.51551/verimlilik.988286 Ding, X., Sheng, Z., Appolloni, A., Shahzad, M., & Han, S. (2024). Digital transformation, ESG practice, and total factor productivity. Business Strategy and the Environment, 33(5), 4547-4561. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.3718
  • Diofasi-Kovacs, O., & Nagy, J. (2023). Beyond CO2 emissions – The role of digitalization in multi-dimensional environmental performance measurement. NagyEnvironmental and Sustainability Indicators, 18, 100252. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indic.2023.100252
  • Dou, X., & Yin, S. (2024). The impact of ESG on corporate financial performance: Based on fixed effects regression model. Journal of Computational Methods in Science and Engineering, 24(4-5), 2719-2731. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3233/JCM-247504
  • Drempetic, S., Klein, C. & Zwergel, B. (2020). The Influence of Firm Size on the ESG Score: Corporate Sustainability Ratings Under Review. Journal of Business Ethics, 167, 333-360. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-019-04164-1
  • Duque-Grisales, E., & Aguilere-Caracuel, J. (2021). Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) scores and financial performance od multilatinas: Moderating effects of geographic international diversification and financial slack. Journal of Business Ethics, 168, 315-334. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-019-04177-w
  • Elfaki, K.E., & Ahmed, E.M. (2024). Digital technology adoption and globalization innovation implications on Asian Pacific green sustainable economic growth. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 10, 100221. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joitmc.2024.100221
  • Eriandani, R., & Winarno, W.A. (2023). ESG and firm performance: The role of digitalization. Journal of Accounting and Investment, 24(3), 993-1010. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18196/jai.v24i3.20044
  • Estelyi, K.S., & Nisar, T.M. (2016). Diverse boards: Why do firms get foreign nationals on their boards?. Journal of Corporate Finance, 39, 174-192. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2016.02.006
  • Fang, M., Nie, H., & Shen, X. (2023). Can enterprise digitization improve ESG performance?. Economic Modelling, 118, 106101. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2022.106101
  • Fu, T., & Li, J. (2023). An empirical analysis of the impact of ESG on financial performance: the moderating role of digital transformation. Frontiers in Environmental Science, 11, 1256052. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2023.1256052
  • Güngör, N., & Şeker, Y. (2022). The relationship between board characteristics and ESG performance: Evidence from the oil, gas and coal sector. Journal of Strategic and Social Researches, 6(1), 17-37. DOI: https://doi.org/10.30692/sisad.1073684
  • Ha, L.T., Huong, T.T.L., & Thanh, T.T. (2022). Is digitalization a driver to enhance environmental performance? An empirical investigation of European countries. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 32, 230-247.DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2022.04.002 Hausman, J. A. (1978). Specification tests in econometrics, Econometrica, 46(6), 1251-1271.
  • Hu, M., Su, Y., & Yu, X. (2024), Does corporate digitalization improve disclosure quality?, Internet Research, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/INTR-12-2023-1149
  • Huang, Q., Xu, C., Xue, X., & Zhu, H. (2023a). Can digital innovation improve firm performance: Evidence from digital patents of Chinese listed firms. International Review of Financial Analysis, 89, 102810. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irfa.2023.102810
  • Huang, Y.S., and Wang, C-J. (2015). Corporate governance and risk-taking of Chinese firms: The role of board size. International Review of Economics and Finance, 37, 96-113. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iref.2014.11.016
  • Huang, Y., Fang, J., Xue, X., & Gao, H. (2023b). Does digital innovation cause better ESG performance? an empirical test of a-listed firms in China. Research in International Business and Finance, 66, 102049. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ribaf.2023.102049
  • Işık, C., Bulut, U., Ongan, S. Islam, H. & Irfan, M. (2024). Exploring how economic growth, renewable energy, internet usage, and mineral rents influence CO2 emissions: A panel quantile regression analysis for 27 OECD countries. Resources Policy, 93, 1-.9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2024.105025 Jiang, W., Wu, J., & Yang, X. (2023). Does digitization drive corporate social responsibility? International Review of Economics and Finance, 88, 14-26. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iref.2023.06.010
  • Jin, S., & Cho, C.M. (2015). Is ICT a new essential for national economic growth in an information society? Government Information Quarterly, 32(3), 253-260. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2015.04.007
  • Jin, X. & Wu, Y. (2024) How does digital transformation affect the ESG performance od Chinese manufacturing state-owned enterprises?- Based on the mediating mechanism of dynamic capabilities and the moderating mechanism of the institutional environment, Plos One, 19(5), 1-26, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0301864
  • Kalia, D. & Aggarwal, D. (2023), Examining impact of ESG score on financial performance of healthcare companies. Journal of Global Reponsibility. 14(1), 155-176. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/JGR-05-2022-0045
  • Kamaludin, K., Ibrahim, I., Sundarasen, S., & Faizal, O. (2022) ESG in the boardroom: evidence from the Malaysian market. International Journal of Corporate Social Responsibility, 7(4). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40991-022-00072-2
  • Kartal, M. T. Depren, Kılıç, S. Pata, U. K. Taşkın, D., & Şavlı, T. (2024). Modeling the link between environmantal, social, and governance disclosures and scores: the case of publicly traded companies in the Borsa Istanbul Sustainability Index. Financial Innovation, 10(80), 1-20. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40854-024-00619-1
  • Koenker, R. (2004). Quantile regression for longitudinal data, Journal of Multivariate Analysis, 91- 74-89. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmva.2004.05.006
  • Koenker, R. & Bassett, G. (1978). Regression quantiles, Econometrica, 46(1), 33-50.
  • Kotrba, V., Mensik, J., & Martinez, L.F. (2024). Is ESG an essential topic for companies operating primarily in the digital environment?. In: Martínez-Lopez, F.J., Martinez, L.F., Brüggemann, P. (eds). Advances in Digital Marketing and eCommerce. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-62135-2_24
  • Korkmaz, T., & Nur, T. (2023). The fffect of ESG sustainability on firm performance: A view under size and sge on BIST Bank Index Firms. Ekonomi Politika ve Finans Araştırmaları Dergisi, 8(2), 208-223. DOI: https://doi.org/10.30784/epfad.1278491
  • Köse, E. (2021). Kurumsal yönetim özelliklerinin çevresel, sosyal ve yönetişim (esg) açıklamalarına etkisi. Uluslararası İşletme, Ekonomi ve Yönetim Perspektifleri Dergisi, 5(Prof. Dr. Fikret OTLU Özel Sayısı), 463-474.
  • Kulalı, G. (2022). Çevresel, sosyal ve kurumsal yönetim (ESG) performansının piyasa değeri üzerindeki etkisi: Firma büyüklüğünün rolü. Eskişehir Osmangazi Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi, 17(3), 787-809. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17153/oguiibf.1098419
  • Kwilinski, A., Lyulyov, O., & Pimonenko, T. (2023). Unlocking sustainable value through digital transformation: An examination of ESG performance. Information, 14(444). DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/info14080444
  • Lastauskaite, A., & Rytis K. (2024). The impact of production digitalization investments on European companies’ financial performance. Economies, 12(138). DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/economies12060138
  • Lee, M. S. (2023). The relationship between green innovation and sustainable growth in Korean companies: Moderated mediation effect of ESG score by industry. Sustainable Development, 32, 2797-2810. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.2807
  • Li, W. & Zhang, M., (2024) Digital transformation, absorptive capacity and enterprise ESG performance: A case study of strategic emerging industries. Sustainability, 16(5018), DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su16125018
  • Liu, P., Zhu, B., Yang, M., & Chu, X. (2022). ESG and financial performance: A qualitative comparative analysis in China’s new energy companies. Journal of Cleaner Production, 379, Bölüm 1, 134721. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.134721
  • Loebbecke, C., & Picot, A. (2015). Reflections on societal and business model transformation arising from digitization and big data analytics: A research agenda. Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 24(3), 149-157. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsis.2015.08.002
  • Lu, Y., Xu, C., Zhu, B., & Sun, Y. (2024). Digitalization transformation and ESG performance: Evidence from China. Business Strategy and the Environment, 33(2), 352–368. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.3494
  • Luo, Z. (2024). The impact of firm digital transformation on environmental, social, and governance performance: Evidence from China. Economics, 18(1), 20220096. https://doi.org/10.1515/econ-2022-0096
  • Mu, W., Liu, K., Tao, Y., & Ye, Y. (2023). Digital finance and corporate ESG. Finance Research Letters, 51, 103426. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2022.103426
  • Myovella, G., Karacuka, M., & Haucap, J. (2020). Digitalization and economic growth: A comparative analysis of Sub-Saharan Africa and OECD economies. Telecommunications Policy, 44(2), 101856. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.telpol.2019.101856
  • Naeem, N., Cankaya, S., & Bildik, R. (2022). Does ESG performance affect the financial performance of environmentally sensitive industries? A comparison between emerging and developed markets. Borsa İstanbul Review, 22, S2, 128-140. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bir.2022.11.014
  • Oğan, E. (2024). Stratejik yönetim perspektifinde dijitalleşme ile ilgili yayımlanan makaleler üzerine sistematik bir inceleme. Artvin Çoruh Üniversitesi Uluslararası Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi. 10(1), 69-86. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22466/acusbd.1493555
  • Özer, G., Aktaş, N., & Çam, İ. (2023). Environmental, social, and governance (ESG) scores and financial performance of publicly listed companies in Turkey. Eskişehir Osmangazi University Journal of Economics and Administrative Sciences, 18(2), 337-353. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17153/oguiibf.1239759
  • Peliu, SA. (2024). Exploring the impact of ESG factors on corporate risk: empirical evidence for New York Stock Exchange listed companies. Future Business Journal, 10(92). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s43093-024-00378-6
  • Peng, Y., Chen, H. & Li, T. (2023). The impact of digital transformation on ESG: A case study of Chinese-Listed Companies. Sustainability, 15(15072), DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su152015072
  • Pinheiro, A.B., Behm, A.J.B., do Prado, N.B., & Mazzioni, S. (2024). The impact of board composition on ESG performance: Comparing results from symmetrical and asymmetrical approaches. Business Strategy & Development, 7(3), e424. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/bsd2.424
  • Pinheiro, M.A.P., Jugend, D., Lopes de Sousa Jabbour, A.B., Chiappetta Jabbour, C.J., & Latan, H. (2022). Circular economy-based new products and company performance: The role of stakeholders and Industry 4.0 technologies. Business Strategy and the Environment, 31(1), 483-499. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2905
  • Radu, C., Smaili, N. & Constantinescu, A. (2022), The impact of the board of directors on corporate social performance: a multivariate approach. Journal of Applied Accounting Research, 23(5), 1135-1156. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/JAAR-05-2021-0141
  • Ren, X., Zeng, G., & Zhao, Y. (2023). Digital finance and corporate ESG performance: Empirical evidence from listed companies in China. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 79, 102019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pacfin.2023.102019
  • Ritter, T., & Pedersen, C.L. (2020). Digitization capability and the digitalization of business models in businessto- business firms: Past, present, and future. Industrial Marketing Management, 86, 180-190. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2019.11.019
  • Romano, M., Cirillo, A., Favino, C., & Netti, A. (2020). ESG (Environmental, Social and Governance) performance and board gender diversity: The moderating role of CEO duality. Sustainability, 12(21), 9298. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su12219298
  • Saygılı, E., Arslan, S., & Birkan, A. O. (2022). ESG practices and corporate financial performance: Evidence from Borsa Istanbul. Borsa Istanbul Review, 22(3), 525-533. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bir.2021.07.001
  • Su, X., Wang, S., & Li, F. (2023). The impact of digital transformation on ESG performance based on the mediating effect of dynamic capabilities. Sustainability, 15(18), 13506. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su151813506
  • Şahin, A., & Acar, E. (2023). ESG skorunun firmaya özgü belirleyicileri, borsa İstanbul örneği. Muhasebe ve Denetime Bakış, 23(70), 111-128. DOI: https://doi.org/10.55322/mdbakis.1238294
  • Şişman, M. E., & Çankaya, S. (2021). Çevresel, sosyal ve kurumsal yönetişim (ESG) verilerinin firmaların finansal performansına etkisi: Hava yolu sektörü üzerine bir çalışma. Çukurova Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 25(1), 73-91. DOI: https://doi.org/10.51945/cuiibfd.880468
  • Tatoğlu Y., F. (2020), Panel veri analizi, İstanbul Beta Yayıncılık.
  • Velte, P. (2017). Does ESG performance have an impact on financial performance? Evidence from Germany. Journal of Global Responsibility, 8(2), 169-178. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/JGR-11-2016-0029
  • Wang, H., Jiao, S., Bu., K., Wang, Y., & Wang, Y. (2023). Digital transformation and manufacturing companies’ ESG responsibility performance. Finance Research Letters, 58, Part B, 104370. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2023.104370
  • Wang, L., & Hou, S. (2024). The impact of digital transformation and earnings management on ESG performance: evidence from Chinese listed enterprises. Scientific Reports, 14(783). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-48636-x
  • Wang, S., Zeng, J., & Liu, X. (2019). Examining the multiple impacts of technological progress on CO2 emissions in China: A panel quantile regression approach. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 103, 140-150. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2018.12.046
  • Wang, Z., & Sarkis, J. (2017). Corporate social responsibility governance, outcomes, and financial performance. Journal of Cleaner Production, 162(20), 1607-1616. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.06.142
  • Witschel, D., Baumann, D., & Voigt, K-I. (2022). How manufacturing firms navigate through stormy waters of digitalization: the role of dynamic capabilities, organizational factors and environmental turbulence for business model innovation. Journal of Management & Organization, 28(3), 681-714. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/jmo.2022.44
  • Wu, S. & Li, Y. (2023). A study on the impact of digital transformation on corporate ESG performance: The mediating role of green innovation. Sustainability, 15(6568) DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su15086568
  • Xu, J., She, S., & Liu, W. (2022). Role of digitalization in environment, social and governance, and sustainability: Review-based study for implications. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 961057. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.961057
  • Yang, Y. & Han, J. (2023). Digital transformation, financing constraints, and corporate environmental, social, and governance performance. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 30, 3189-3202. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.2546
  • Yang, X., & Han, Q. (2024). Nonlinear effects of enterprise digital transformation on environmental, social and governance (ESG) performance: evidence from China. Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal, 15(2), 355-381. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/SAMPJ-08-2023-0553
  • Yıkılmaz, A. (2022). Çevresel, sosyal ve kurumsal yönetişim (ESG) skorları ve kâr payı kararları arasındaki ilişkinin incelenmesi. Finans Ekonomi ve Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi, 7(4), 872-881. https://doi.org/10.29106/fesa.1209238
  • Yoşumaz, İ., & Uzun, H. (2024). The relationship between industry 5.0 Process and ESG process: A qualitative analysis in the context of Türkiye’s Bist Sustainability 25 Index white good sector. Environmental Research and Technology, 7(4), 512-529. https://doi.org/10.35208/ert.1431800
  • Zang, L, Ye, Y. Meng, Z. Ma, N., & Wu, C-H. (2024). Enterprise digital transformation, dynamic capabilities and ESG peformance: Based on data from listed Chinese companies. Journal of Global Information Management, 32(1). DOI: https://doi.org/10.4018/JGIM.335905
  • Zhou, H., & Liu, J. (2023). Digitalization of the economy and resource efficiency for meeting the ESG goals. Resources Policy, 86, Part A, 104199. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2023.104199
  • Zhao, Q, Li, X., & Li, S. (2023). Analyzing the relationship between digital transformation strategy and ESG performance in large manufacturing enterprises: The mediating role of green innovation. Sustainability, 15, 9988, 1-22. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su15139998

Dijitalleşme Yatırımlarının Türkiye’deki Şirketlerin ESG Skorları Üzerindeki Etkisi: Bir Panel Kantil Regresyon Yaklaşımı

Year 2025, Volume: 26 Issue: 2, 1 - 19, 30.04.2025

Meltem Kılıç , Aydın Gürbüz

Abstract

Dijitalleşme, son yıllarda küresel ölçekte önemli bir gelişim alanı haline gelmiştir. Teknolojik yenilikler ve dijital dönüşüm, işletmelerin stratejik kararlarını, operasyonel verimliliklerini ve pazardaki rekabetçiliklerini önemli ölçüde etkilemektedir. Bunun yanı sıra, dijitalleşme yalnızca ekonomik ve operasyonel düzeyde değil, aynı zamanda çevresel, sosyal ve yönetişim (ESG) kriterlerine de etkide bulunmaktadır. ESG, günümüzde şirketlerin sürdürülebilirlik performanslarını değerlendiren bir ölçüt haline gelmiş ve bu kriterlere odaklanan yatırımlar hem yatırımcılar hem de diğer paydaşlar tarafından giderek daha fazla önemsenmektedir. Bu bağlamda, dijitalleşme yatırımlarının ESG skorları üzerindeki potansiyel etkileri, özellikle Türkiye gibi gelişmekte olan ekonomilerde merak konusu olmuştur. Bu çalışmada, 2015-2022 yılları arasında Türkiye'deki ESG (Çevresel, Sosyal ve Yönetişim) skoru yayımlayan firmaların dijitalleşme yatırımlarının ESG skorları üzerindeki etkisi incelenmiştir. Panel kantil regresyon yöntemiyle yapılan analizde, firmaların dijitalleşme yatırımlarının, özellikle düşük ESG skoruna sahip olan %10’luk kantil aralığındaki firmaların ESG skorları üzerinde anlamlı bir etkisi olduğu bulunmuştur. Bununla birlikte, diğer kantil aralıklarında dijitalleşme yatırımlarının ESG performansı üzerinde anlamlı bir etkisi gözlemlenmemiştir. Bu durum, dijitalleşmenin etkisinin, belirli bir gelişmişlik düzeyine ulaşmış firmalar için farklı şekilde şekillendiğini ve dijitalleşme yatırımlarının daha düşük ESG performansına sahip firmalar için daha belirgin faydalar sağladığını göstermektedir.

Keywords

Dijitalleşme ESG Sürdürülebilirlik Türkiye Panel Kantil Regresyon

References

  • Akyol, H., Akar, T., & Akar, G. (2023). Digitalization and economic growth: New evidence from EU countries. Balıkesir University The Journal of Social Sciences Institute, 26(49), 99-14. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31795/baunsobed.1234251
  • Apergis, N., Poufinas, T. & Antonopoulos, A. (2022). ESG score and cost of debt, Energy Economics, 112, 1-10. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2022.106186
  • Arayssi, M., Jizi, M., & Tabaja, H.H. (2020). The impact of board composition on the level of ESG disclosures in GCC countries. Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal, 11(1), 137-161. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/SAMPJ-05-2018-0136
  • Arif, M. Sajjad, A. Farooq, S. Abrar, M. & Joyo, A.S. (2021). The impact of audit committe attributes on the quality and quantity of environmental, social and governance (ESG) disclosures. Corporate Governance, 21(3), 497-514. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/CG-06-2020-0243
  • Arslan, Z., & Yağcılar, G. G. (2023). Sürdürülebilir finans kapsamında çevresel, sosyal ve kurumsal yönetim (ESG) ile banka karlılığı arasındaki ilişki üzerine uluslararası bir araştırma. Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi Vizyoner Dergisi, 14(40), 1236-1263. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21076/vizyoner.1218886
  • Aydoğmuş, M., Gülay, G., & Ergun, K. (2022). Impact of ESG performance on firm value and profitability. Borsa İstanbul Review, 22, S2, 119-127. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bir.2022.11.006
  • Bigelli, M., Mengoli, S., & Sandri, S. (2023). ESG score, board structure and the impact of the non-financial reporting directive on European firms. Journal of Economics and Business. 127, 1-13. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeconbus.2023.106133
  • Buchinsky, M. (1998). Recent advances in quantile regression models: A practical guideline for empirical research. The Journal of Human Resources. 33(1), 88-126
  • Bloomberg, (2018). Environmental, Social & Governance (ESG) product. https://data.bloomberglp.com/professional/sites/10/1148330431.pdf Erişim tarihi: (03.11.2024).
  • Bloomberg (2023). Bloomberg ESG scores. https://hr.bloombergadria.com/data/files/Pitanja%20i%20odgovori%20o%20Bloomberg%20ESG%20Scoreu.pdf Erişim tarihi: (03.11.2024).
  • Brodny, J. & Tutak, M. (2022). Analyzing the level of digitalization among the enterprises of the European Union member states and their impact on economic growth. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 8(70), 1-29. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/joitmc8020070
  • Cai, C., Tu, Y., & Li, Z. (2023). Enterprise digital transformation and ESG performance. Finance Research Letters, 58, 104692. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2023.104692
  • Camilleri, M. A. (2015). Environmental, social and governance disclosures in Europe. Sustainability Accounting Management and Policy Journal. 6(2), 224-242. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/SAMPJ-10-2014-0065
  • Camodeca, R. & Almici, A. (2021) Digital transformation and convergence toward the 2030 Agenda’s sustainability development goals: Evidence from Italian listed firms. Sustainability, 13(11831) DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su132111831
  • Canarella, G., & Miller, S.M. (2018). The determinants of growth in the U.S. information and communication technology (ICT) industry: A firm-level analysis. Economic Modelling, 70, 259-271. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2017.11.011
  • Clement, A. Robinot, E. & Trespuuch, L. (2023). The use of ESG scores in academic literatüre: a systematic literatüre review. Journal of Enterprising Communities People and Places the Global Economy, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/JEC-10-2022-0147
  • Conyon, M. J. & He, L. (2017). Firm performance and boardroom gender diversity: A quantile regression approach. Journal of Business Research, 79, 198-211. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2017.02.006 Çetenak, E. H., Ersoy, E., & Işık, Ö. (2022). ESG (çevresel, sosyal ve kurumsal yönetim) skorunun firma performansına etkisi: Türk bankacılık sektörü örneği. Erciyes Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, (63), 75-82. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18070/erciyesiibd.1212587
  • Dahlman, C., Mealy, S., & Wermelinger, M. (2016). Harnessing the digital economy for developing countries. OECD Development Centre Working Papers, 334. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1787/4adffb24-en
  • DasGupta, R. (2022). Financial performance shortfall, ESG controversies, and ESG performance: Evidence from firms around the world. Finance Research Letters, 46, Part B, 102487. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2021.102487
  • Daud, S.N.M., & Ahmad, A.H. (2023). Financial inclusion, economic growth and the role of digital technology. Finance Research Letters, 53, 103602. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2022.103602
  • Demirkıran, S. Beyoğlu, A., Terzioğlu, M. K. & Yaşar, A. (2021) Sürdürülebilir kalkınma odaklı dijitalleşme belirleyicilerinin verimlilik üzerindeki etkilerinin yapay sinir ağları ile sınıflandırılması. Verimlilik Dergisi, Özel Sayı, Dijital Dönüşüm ve Verimlilik, 30-47. DOI: https://doi.org/10.51551/verimlilik.988286 Ding, X., Sheng, Z., Appolloni, A., Shahzad, M., & Han, S. (2024). Digital transformation, ESG practice, and total factor productivity. Business Strategy and the Environment, 33(5), 4547-4561. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.3718
  • Diofasi-Kovacs, O., & Nagy, J. (2023). Beyond CO2 emissions – The role of digitalization in multi-dimensional environmental performance measurement. NagyEnvironmental and Sustainability Indicators, 18, 100252. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indic.2023.100252
  • Dou, X., & Yin, S. (2024). The impact of ESG on corporate financial performance: Based on fixed effects regression model. Journal of Computational Methods in Science and Engineering, 24(4-5), 2719-2731. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3233/JCM-247504
  • Drempetic, S., Klein, C. & Zwergel, B. (2020). The Influence of Firm Size on the ESG Score: Corporate Sustainability Ratings Under Review. Journal of Business Ethics, 167, 333-360. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-019-04164-1
  • Duque-Grisales, E., & Aguilere-Caracuel, J. (2021). Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) scores and financial performance od multilatinas: Moderating effects of geographic international diversification and financial slack. Journal of Business Ethics, 168, 315-334. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-019-04177-w
  • Elfaki, K.E., & Ahmed, E.M. (2024). Digital technology adoption and globalization innovation implications on Asian Pacific green sustainable economic growth. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 10, 100221. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joitmc.2024.100221
  • Eriandani, R., & Winarno, W.A. (2023). ESG and firm performance: The role of digitalization. Journal of Accounting and Investment, 24(3), 993-1010. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18196/jai.v24i3.20044
  • Estelyi, K.S., & Nisar, T.M. (2016). Diverse boards: Why do firms get foreign nationals on their boards?. Journal of Corporate Finance, 39, 174-192. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2016.02.006
  • Fang, M., Nie, H., & Shen, X. (2023). Can enterprise digitization improve ESG performance?. Economic Modelling, 118, 106101. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2022.106101
  • Fu, T., & Li, J. (2023). An empirical analysis of the impact of ESG on financial performance: the moderating role of digital transformation. Frontiers in Environmental Science, 11, 1256052. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2023.1256052
  • Güngör, N., & Şeker, Y. (2022). The relationship between board characteristics and ESG performance: Evidence from the oil, gas and coal sector. Journal of Strategic and Social Researches, 6(1), 17-37. DOI: https://doi.org/10.30692/sisad.1073684
  • Ha, L.T., Huong, T.T.L., & Thanh, T.T. (2022). Is digitalization a driver to enhance environmental performance? An empirical investigation of European countries. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 32, 230-247.DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2022.04.002 Hausman, J. A. (1978). Specification tests in econometrics, Econometrica, 46(6), 1251-1271.
  • Hu, M., Su, Y., & Yu, X. (2024), Does corporate digitalization improve disclosure quality?, Internet Research, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/INTR-12-2023-1149
  • Huang, Q., Xu, C., Xue, X., & Zhu, H. (2023a). Can digital innovation improve firm performance: Evidence from digital patents of Chinese listed firms. International Review of Financial Analysis, 89, 102810. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irfa.2023.102810
  • Huang, Y.S., and Wang, C-J. (2015). Corporate governance and risk-taking of Chinese firms: The role of board size. International Review of Economics and Finance, 37, 96-113. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iref.2014.11.016
  • Huang, Y., Fang, J., Xue, X., & Gao, H. (2023b). Does digital innovation cause better ESG performance? an empirical test of a-listed firms in China. Research in International Business and Finance, 66, 102049. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ribaf.2023.102049
  • Işık, C., Bulut, U., Ongan, S. Islam, H. & Irfan, M. (2024). Exploring how economic growth, renewable energy, internet usage, and mineral rents influence CO2 emissions: A panel quantile regression analysis for 27 OECD countries. Resources Policy, 93, 1-.9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2024.105025 Jiang, W., Wu, J., & Yang, X. (2023). Does digitization drive corporate social responsibility? International Review of Economics and Finance, 88, 14-26. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iref.2023.06.010
  • Jin, S., & Cho, C.M. (2015). Is ICT a new essential for national economic growth in an information society? Government Information Quarterly, 32(3), 253-260. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2015.04.007
  • Jin, X. & Wu, Y. (2024) How does digital transformation affect the ESG performance od Chinese manufacturing state-owned enterprises?- Based on the mediating mechanism of dynamic capabilities and the moderating mechanism of the institutional environment, Plos One, 19(5), 1-26, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0301864
  • Kalia, D. & Aggarwal, D. (2023), Examining impact of ESG score on financial performance of healthcare companies. Journal of Global Reponsibility. 14(1), 155-176. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/JGR-05-2022-0045
  • Kamaludin, K., Ibrahim, I., Sundarasen, S., & Faizal, O. (2022) ESG in the boardroom: evidence from the Malaysian market. International Journal of Corporate Social Responsibility, 7(4). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40991-022-00072-2
  • Kartal, M. T. Depren, Kılıç, S. Pata, U. K. Taşkın, D., & Şavlı, T. (2024). Modeling the link between environmantal, social, and governance disclosures and scores: the case of publicly traded companies in the Borsa Istanbul Sustainability Index. Financial Innovation, 10(80), 1-20. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40854-024-00619-1
  • Koenker, R. (2004). Quantile regression for longitudinal data, Journal of Multivariate Analysis, 91- 74-89. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmva.2004.05.006
  • Koenker, R. & Bassett, G. (1978). Regression quantiles, Econometrica, 46(1), 33-50.
  • Kotrba, V., Mensik, J., & Martinez, L.F. (2024). Is ESG an essential topic for companies operating primarily in the digital environment?. In: Martínez-Lopez, F.J., Martinez, L.F., Brüggemann, P. (eds). Advances in Digital Marketing and eCommerce. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-62135-2_24
  • Korkmaz, T., & Nur, T. (2023). The fffect of ESG sustainability on firm performance: A view under size and sge on BIST Bank Index Firms. Ekonomi Politika ve Finans Araştırmaları Dergisi, 8(2), 208-223. DOI: https://doi.org/10.30784/epfad.1278491
  • Köse, E. (2021). Kurumsal yönetim özelliklerinin çevresel, sosyal ve yönetişim (esg) açıklamalarına etkisi. Uluslararası İşletme, Ekonomi ve Yönetim Perspektifleri Dergisi, 5(Prof. Dr. Fikret OTLU Özel Sayısı), 463-474.
  • Kulalı, G. (2022). Çevresel, sosyal ve kurumsal yönetim (ESG) performansının piyasa değeri üzerindeki etkisi: Firma büyüklüğünün rolü. Eskişehir Osmangazi Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi, 17(3), 787-809. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17153/oguiibf.1098419
  • Kwilinski, A., Lyulyov, O., & Pimonenko, T. (2023). Unlocking sustainable value through digital transformation: An examination of ESG performance. Information, 14(444). DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/info14080444
  • Lastauskaite, A., & Rytis K. (2024). The impact of production digitalization investments on European companies’ financial performance. Economies, 12(138). DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/economies12060138
  • Lee, M. S. (2023). The relationship between green innovation and sustainable growth in Korean companies: Moderated mediation effect of ESG score by industry. Sustainable Development, 32, 2797-2810. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.2807
  • Li, W. & Zhang, M., (2024) Digital transformation, absorptive capacity and enterprise ESG performance: A case study of strategic emerging industries. Sustainability, 16(5018), DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su16125018
  • Liu, P., Zhu, B., Yang, M., & Chu, X. (2022). ESG and financial performance: A qualitative comparative analysis in China’s new energy companies. Journal of Cleaner Production, 379, Bölüm 1, 134721. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.134721
  • Loebbecke, C., & Picot, A. (2015). Reflections on societal and business model transformation arising from digitization and big data analytics: A research agenda. Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 24(3), 149-157. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsis.2015.08.002
  • Lu, Y., Xu, C., Zhu, B., & Sun, Y. (2024). Digitalization transformation and ESG performance: Evidence from China. Business Strategy and the Environment, 33(2), 352–368. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.3494
  • Luo, Z. (2024). The impact of firm digital transformation on environmental, social, and governance performance: Evidence from China. Economics, 18(1), 20220096. https://doi.org/10.1515/econ-2022-0096
  • Mu, W., Liu, K., Tao, Y., & Ye, Y. (2023). Digital finance and corporate ESG. Finance Research Letters, 51, 103426. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2022.103426
  • Myovella, G., Karacuka, M., & Haucap, J. (2020). Digitalization and economic growth: A comparative analysis of Sub-Saharan Africa and OECD economies. Telecommunications Policy, 44(2), 101856. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.telpol.2019.101856
  • Naeem, N., Cankaya, S., & Bildik, R. (2022). Does ESG performance affect the financial performance of environmentally sensitive industries? A comparison between emerging and developed markets. Borsa İstanbul Review, 22, S2, 128-140. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bir.2022.11.014
  • Oğan, E. (2024). Stratejik yönetim perspektifinde dijitalleşme ile ilgili yayımlanan makaleler üzerine sistematik bir inceleme. Artvin Çoruh Üniversitesi Uluslararası Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi. 10(1), 69-86. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22466/acusbd.1493555
  • Özer, G., Aktaş, N., & Çam, İ. (2023). Environmental, social, and governance (ESG) scores and financial performance of publicly listed companies in Turkey. Eskişehir Osmangazi University Journal of Economics and Administrative Sciences, 18(2), 337-353. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17153/oguiibf.1239759
  • Peliu, SA. (2024). Exploring the impact of ESG factors on corporate risk: empirical evidence for New York Stock Exchange listed companies. Future Business Journal, 10(92). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s43093-024-00378-6
  • Peng, Y., Chen, H. & Li, T. (2023). The impact of digital transformation on ESG: A case study of Chinese-Listed Companies. Sustainability, 15(15072), DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su152015072
  • Pinheiro, A.B., Behm, A.J.B., do Prado, N.B., & Mazzioni, S. (2024). The impact of board composition on ESG performance: Comparing results from symmetrical and asymmetrical approaches. Business Strategy & Development, 7(3), e424. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/bsd2.424
  • Pinheiro, M.A.P., Jugend, D., Lopes de Sousa Jabbour, A.B., Chiappetta Jabbour, C.J., & Latan, H. (2022). Circular economy-based new products and company performance: The role of stakeholders and Industry 4.0 technologies. Business Strategy and the Environment, 31(1), 483-499. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2905
  • Radu, C., Smaili, N. & Constantinescu, A. (2022), The impact of the board of directors on corporate social performance: a multivariate approach. Journal of Applied Accounting Research, 23(5), 1135-1156. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/JAAR-05-2021-0141
  • Ren, X., Zeng, G., & Zhao, Y. (2023). Digital finance and corporate ESG performance: Empirical evidence from listed companies in China. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 79, 102019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pacfin.2023.102019
  • Ritter, T., & Pedersen, C.L. (2020). Digitization capability and the digitalization of business models in businessto- business firms: Past, present, and future. Industrial Marketing Management, 86, 180-190. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2019.11.019
  • Romano, M., Cirillo, A., Favino, C., & Netti, A. (2020). ESG (Environmental, Social and Governance) performance and board gender diversity: The moderating role of CEO duality. Sustainability, 12(21), 9298. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su12219298
  • Saygılı, E., Arslan, S., & Birkan, A. O. (2022). ESG practices and corporate financial performance: Evidence from Borsa Istanbul. Borsa Istanbul Review, 22(3), 525-533. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bir.2021.07.001
  • Su, X., Wang, S., & Li, F. (2023). The impact of digital transformation on ESG performance based on the mediating effect of dynamic capabilities. Sustainability, 15(18), 13506. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su151813506
  • Şahin, A., & Acar, E. (2023). ESG skorunun firmaya özgü belirleyicileri, borsa İstanbul örneği. Muhasebe ve Denetime Bakış, 23(70), 111-128. DOI: https://doi.org/10.55322/mdbakis.1238294
  • Şişman, M. E., & Çankaya, S. (2021). Çevresel, sosyal ve kurumsal yönetişim (ESG) verilerinin firmaların finansal performansına etkisi: Hava yolu sektörü üzerine bir çalışma. Çukurova Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 25(1), 73-91. DOI: https://doi.org/10.51945/cuiibfd.880468
  • Tatoğlu Y., F. (2020), Panel veri analizi, İstanbul Beta Yayıncılık.
  • Velte, P. (2017). Does ESG performance have an impact on financial performance? Evidence from Germany. Journal of Global Responsibility, 8(2), 169-178. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/JGR-11-2016-0029
  • Wang, H., Jiao, S., Bu., K., Wang, Y., & Wang, Y. (2023). Digital transformation and manufacturing companies’ ESG responsibility performance. Finance Research Letters, 58, Part B, 104370. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2023.104370
  • Wang, L., & Hou, S. (2024). The impact of digital transformation and earnings management on ESG performance: evidence from Chinese listed enterprises. Scientific Reports, 14(783). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-48636-x
  • Wang, S., Zeng, J., & Liu, X. (2019). Examining the multiple impacts of technological progress on CO2 emissions in China: A panel quantile regression approach. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 103, 140-150. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2018.12.046
  • Wang, Z., & Sarkis, J. (2017). Corporate social responsibility governance, outcomes, and financial performance. Journal of Cleaner Production, 162(20), 1607-1616. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.06.142
  • Witschel, D., Baumann, D., & Voigt, K-I. (2022). How manufacturing firms navigate through stormy waters of digitalization: the role of dynamic capabilities, organizational factors and environmental turbulence for business model innovation. Journal of Management & Organization, 28(3), 681-714. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/jmo.2022.44
  • Wu, S. & Li, Y. (2023). A study on the impact of digital transformation on corporate ESG performance: The mediating role of green innovation. Sustainability, 15(6568) DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su15086568
  • Xu, J., She, S., & Liu, W. (2022). Role of digitalization in environment, social and governance, and sustainability: Review-based study for implications. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 961057. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.961057
  • Yang, Y. & Han, J. (2023). Digital transformation, financing constraints, and corporate environmental, social, and governance performance. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 30, 3189-3202. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.2546
  • Yang, X., & Han, Q. (2024). Nonlinear effects of enterprise digital transformation on environmental, social and governance (ESG) performance: evidence from China. Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal, 15(2), 355-381. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/SAMPJ-08-2023-0553
  • Yıkılmaz, A. (2022). Çevresel, sosyal ve kurumsal yönetişim (ESG) skorları ve kâr payı kararları arasındaki ilişkinin incelenmesi. Finans Ekonomi ve Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi, 7(4), 872-881. https://doi.org/10.29106/fesa.1209238
  • Yoşumaz, İ., & Uzun, H. (2024). The relationship between industry 5.0 Process and ESG process: A qualitative analysis in the context of Türkiye’s Bist Sustainability 25 Index white good sector. Environmental Research and Technology, 7(4), 512-529. https://doi.org/10.35208/ert.1431800
  • Zang, L, Ye, Y. Meng, Z. Ma, N., & Wu, C-H. (2024). Enterprise digital transformation, dynamic capabilities and ESG peformance: Based on data from listed Chinese companies. Journal of Global Information Management, 32(1). DOI: https://doi.org/10.4018/JGIM.335905
  • Zhou, H., & Liu, J. (2023). Digitalization of the economy and resource efficiency for meeting the ESG goals. Resources Policy, 86, Part A, 104199. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2023.104199
  • Zhao, Q, Li, X., & Li, S. (2023). Analyzing the relationship between digital transformation strategy and ESG performance in large manufacturing enterprises: The mediating role of green innovation. Sustainability, 15, 9988, 1-22. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su15139998
There are 89 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language Turkish
Subjects Finance
Journal Section Makaleler
Authors

Meltem Kılıç 0000-0001-8978-9076

Aydın Gürbüz 0000-0002-2428-2327

Publication Date April 30, 2025
Submission Date December 26, 2024
Acceptance Date February 9, 2025
Published in Issue Year 2025Volume: 26 Issue: 2

Cite

APA Kılıç, M., & Gürbüz, A. (2025). Dijitalleşme Yatırımlarının Türkiye’deki Şirketlerin ESG Skorları Üzerindeki Etkisi: Bir Panel Kantil Regresyon Yaklaşımı. Cumhuriyet Üniversitesi İktisadi Ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi, 26(2), 1-19.
 Download Cover Image

Cumhuriyet University Journal of Economics and Administrative Sciences is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY NC).