Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite

Exploring Individual Preferences on Protecting Environment: A Binominal Logistic Regression

Year 2023, Volume: 24 Issue: 1, 85 - 95, 16.01.2023

Esra Karapınar Kocağ

https://doi.org/10.37880/cumuiibf.1180228

Abstract

Validity of Environmental Kuznets Curve (EKC) hypothesis has been tested by several researchers. While macro approaches towards EKC hypothesis are largely discussed in the literature, microeconomic approaches are quite scarce. This paper, in this respect, aims to provide individual insights on the environmental preferences. Using individual priority towards environmental protection rather than economic growth as an environmental indicator, I investigate individual factors affecting this preference. To the best of my knowledge, this study is the first attempt that explains individual environmental preferences by a wide range of individual characteristics exploiting individual observations from more than a hundred countries for the period of 1995-2020. The findings indicate that there is no clear evidence to support EKC hypothesis. However, significant effects of age, gender, education, unemployment, along with further significant explanatory variables are expected to be useful to make appropriate policies for a greener future.

Keywords

EKC Environmental Preferences World Values Survey Logistic Estimation

References

  • Apergis, N. and Ozturk, I. (2015) ‘Testing environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis in Asian countries’, Ecological Indicators. Elsevier Ltd, 52, pp. 16–22. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2014.11.026.
  • Bekhet, H. A., Othman, N. S. and Yasmin, T. (2020) ‘Interaction between environmental Kuznet curve and urban environment transition hypotheses in Malaysia’, International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, 10(1), pp. 384–402. doi: 10.32479/ijeep.8389.
  • Bhattarai, M. and Hammig, M. (2001) ‘Institutions and the Environmental Kuznets Curve for Deforestation: A Crosscountry Analysis for Latin America, Africa and Asia’, World Development, 29(6), pp. 995–1010. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0305-750X(01)00019-5.
  • Grossman, G. M. and Krueger, A. B. (1991) ‘1050 Massachusetts Avenue Jeff Mackie-Mason provided helpful comments and’, NBER Working Paper Series, (3914).
  • Inglehart, R., C. Haerpfer, A. Moreno, C. Welzel, K. Kizilova, J. Diez-Medrano, M. Lagos, P. Norris, E. P. & B. P. et al. (eds. . (2014) World Values Survey: All Rounds - Country-Pooled Datafile Version. Madrid: JD Systems Institute. Available at: https://www.worldvaluessurvey.org/WVSDocumentationWVL.jsp.
  • Iwata, H., Okada, K. and Samreth, S. (2010) ‘Empirical study on the environmental Kuznets curve for CO2 in France: The role of nuclear energy’, Energy Policy, 38(8), pp. 4057–4063. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2010.03.031.
  • Kanjilal, K. and Ghosh, S. (2013) ‘Environmental Kuznet’s curve for India: Evidence from tests for cointegration with unknown structuralbreaks’, Energy Policy, 56, pp. 509–515. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2013.01.015.
  • Kuznets, S. (1955) ‘Linked references are available on JSTOR for this article’, Academy of Management Review, 65(1), pp. 386–408. Lekakis, J. N. and Kousis, M. (2001) ‘Demand for and supply of environmental quality in the environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis’, Applied Economics Letters. Routledge, 8(3), pp. 169–172. doi: 10.1080/13504850150504531.
  • Mazzanti, M. and Zoboli, R. (2009) ‘Municipal Waste Kuznets Curves: Evidence on Socio-Economic Drivers and Policy Effectiveness from the EU’, Environmental and Resource Economics, 44(2), p. 203. doi: 10.1007/s10640-009-9280-x.
  • Narayan, P. K. and Narayan, S. (2010) ‘Carbon dioxide emissions and economic growth: Panel data evidence from developing countries’, Energy Policy, 38(1), pp. 661–666. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2009.09.005.
  • Roca, J. et al. (2001) ‘Economic growth and atmospheric pollution in Spain: discussing the environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis’, Ecological Economics, 39(1), pp. 85–99. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-8009(01)00195-1.
  • Roca, J. (2003) ‘Do individual preferences explain the Environmental Kuznets curve?’, Ecological Economics, 45(1), pp. 3–10. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-8009(02)00263-X.
  • Saboori, B., Sulaiman, J. and Mohd, S. (2012) ‘Economic growth and CO2 emissions in Malaysia: A cointegration analysis of the Environmental Kuznets Curve’, Energy Policy, 51, pp. 184–191. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2012.08.065.

Exploring Individual Preferences on Protecting Environment: A Binominal Logistic Regression

Year 2023, Volume: 24 Issue: 1, 85 - 95, 16.01.2023

Esra Karapınar Kocağ

https://doi.org/10.37880/cumuiibf.1180228

Abstract

Validity of Environmental Kuznets Curve (EKC) hypothesis has been tested by several researchers. While macro approaches towards EKC hypothesis are largely discussed in the literature, microeconomic approaches are quite scarce. This paper, in this respect, aims to provide individual insights on the environmental preferences. Using individual priority towards environmental protection rather than economic growth as an environmental indicator, I investigate individual factors affecting this preference. To the best of my knowledge, this study is the first attempt that explains individual environmental preferences by a wide range of individual characteristics exploiting individual observations from more than a hundred countries for the period of 1995-2020. The findings indicate that there is no clear evidence to support EKC hypothesis. However, significant effects of age, gender, education, unemployment, along with further significant explanatory variables are expected to be useful to make appropriate policies for a greener future.

Keywords

EKC Environmental Preferences World Values Survey Logistic Estimation

References

  • Apergis, N. and Ozturk, I. (2015) ‘Testing environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis in Asian countries’, Ecological Indicators. Elsevier Ltd, 52, pp. 16–22. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2014.11.026.
  • Bekhet, H. A., Othman, N. S. and Yasmin, T. (2020) ‘Interaction between environmental Kuznet curve and urban environment transition hypotheses in Malaysia’, International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, 10(1), pp. 384–402. doi: 10.32479/ijeep.8389.
  • Bhattarai, M. and Hammig, M. (2001) ‘Institutions and the Environmental Kuznets Curve for Deforestation: A Crosscountry Analysis for Latin America, Africa and Asia’, World Development, 29(6), pp. 995–1010. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0305-750X(01)00019-5.
  • Grossman, G. M. and Krueger, A. B. (1991) ‘1050 Massachusetts Avenue Jeff Mackie-Mason provided helpful comments and’, NBER Working Paper Series, (3914).
  • Inglehart, R., C. Haerpfer, A. Moreno, C. Welzel, K. Kizilova, J. Diez-Medrano, M. Lagos, P. Norris, E. P. & B. P. et al. (eds. . (2014) World Values Survey: All Rounds - Country-Pooled Datafile Version. Madrid: JD Systems Institute. Available at: https://www.worldvaluessurvey.org/WVSDocumentationWVL.jsp.
  • Iwata, H., Okada, K. and Samreth, S. (2010) ‘Empirical study on the environmental Kuznets curve for CO2 in France: The role of nuclear energy’, Energy Policy, 38(8), pp. 4057–4063. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2010.03.031.
  • Kanjilal, K. and Ghosh, S. (2013) ‘Environmental Kuznet’s curve for India: Evidence from tests for cointegration with unknown structuralbreaks’, Energy Policy, 56, pp. 509–515. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2013.01.015.
  • Kuznets, S. (1955) ‘Linked references are available on JSTOR for this article’, Academy of Management Review, 65(1), pp. 386–408. Lekakis, J. N. and Kousis, M. (2001) ‘Demand for and supply of environmental quality in the environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis’, Applied Economics Letters. Routledge, 8(3), pp. 169–172. doi: 10.1080/13504850150504531.
  • Mazzanti, M. and Zoboli, R. (2009) ‘Municipal Waste Kuznets Curves: Evidence on Socio-Economic Drivers and Policy Effectiveness from the EU’, Environmental and Resource Economics, 44(2), p. 203. doi: 10.1007/s10640-009-9280-x.
  • Narayan, P. K. and Narayan, S. (2010) ‘Carbon dioxide emissions and economic growth: Panel data evidence from developing countries’, Energy Policy, 38(1), pp. 661–666. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2009.09.005.
  • Roca, J. et al. (2001) ‘Economic growth and atmospheric pollution in Spain: discussing the environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis’, Ecological Economics, 39(1), pp. 85–99. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-8009(01)00195-1.
  • Roca, J. (2003) ‘Do individual preferences explain the Environmental Kuznets curve?’, Ecological Economics, 45(1), pp. 3–10. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-8009(02)00263-X.
  • Saboori, B., Sulaiman, J. and Mohd, S. (2012) ‘Economic growth and CO2 emissions in Malaysia: A cointegration analysis of the Environmental Kuznets Curve’, Energy Policy, 51, pp. 184–191. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2012.08.065.
There are 13 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language Turkish
Journal Section Makaleler
Authors

Esra Karapınar Kocağ 0000-0002-2239-0519

Early Pub Date January 11, 2023
Publication Date January 16, 2023
Submission Date September 26, 2022
Published in Issue Year 2023Volume: 24 Issue: 1

Cite

APA Karapınar Kocağ, E. (2023). Exploring Individual Preferences on Protecting Environment: A Binominal Logistic Regression. Cumhuriyet Üniversitesi İktisadi Ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi, 24(1), 85-95. https://doi.org/10.37880/cumuiibf.1180228
 Download Cover Image

Cumhuriyet University Journal of Economics and Administrative Sciences is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY NC).