Redirecting to http://dergipark.org.tr/_fragment?_hash=e059RPEGT-UErznmPlWP5pkUbHg4GrTc7fpxMB_hAzk&_path=id%3D1335524%26_format%3Dhtml%26_locale%3Dtr%26_controller%3DApp%255CController%255CSite%255CArticleController%253A%253AesiArticleStats.
Araştırma Makalesi
BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster

Kurumsal Kalitenin Ekolojik Ayak İzi Üzerine Etkisinin Ampirik Analizi: E7 Ülkeleri Örneği

Yıl 2023, Cilt: 24 Sayı: 4, 636 - 645, 30.10.2023

Nalan Kangal

https://doi.org/10.37880/cumuiibf.1335524
Cited By: 1

Öz

Çalışmada sürdürülebilir kalkınma kapsamında kurumsal kalite ve yenilenebilir enerji kullanımı gibi iki önemli değişkenin ekolojik ayak izi üzerindeki etkisi analiz edilmektedir. Gelişen ekonomiler olarak isimlendirilen E7 ülkeleri olan Çin, Brezilya, Hindistan, Endonezya, Meksika, Rusya ve Türkiye’nin analize dahil edildiği çalışmada 2002-2018 dönemi kurumsal kalite, yenilenebilir enerji tüketim, ekolojik ayak izi, ihracat ve kişi başına düşen GSYİH verileri kullanılarak Toplamsal Olmayan Sabit Etkili Panel Kantil yöntemi kullanılmıştır. Analizde Kurumsal Kalitenin Ekolojik Ayak İzi arasında negatif bir ilişki tespit edilmiştir. Kurumsal Kalitenin artması Ekolojik Ayak İzi’ni azaltmaktadır. Diğer değişkenlerden olan Yenilenebilir Enerji Tüketimi, kişi başına düzen GSYİH ve ihracat ile Ekolojik Ayak İzi arasında ise pozitif bir ilişki tespit edilmiştir. Bu sonuçlardan yola çıkarak ülkelerin uygulanabilecekleri politika önerileri sıralanmıştır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Çevresel Sürdürülebilirlik Krumsal Kalite Ekonolik Ayak İzi E7 Ülkeleri

Kaynakça

  • Acar, T. & Topdağ, D. (2022). OECD ülkelerinde sefalet endeksi ve ekonomik kalkınma ekseninde sağlık harcamalarının belirleyicileri: toplamsal olmayan sabit etkili panel kantil regresyon yaklaşımı. Sosyal Siyaset Konferansları Dergisi. 82: 267-286. https://doi.org/10.26650/jspc.2022.82.946640.
  • Abid, M. (2017). Do economic, financial and institutional developments matter for environmental quality? A comparative analysis of EU and MEA countries. Journal of Environmental Management, 188, 183-194.
  • Adams, S., Klobodu, E. K. M. & Opoku, E. E. O. (2016). Energy consumption, political regime and economic growth in Subsaharan Africa. Energy Policy, 96, 36-44.
  • Bhattacharya, M. Churchill, S.A. & Paramati, S.R. (2017). The dynamic impact of renewable energy and institutions on economic output and CO2 emissions across regio. Renewable Energy, 111, 157-167.
  • Chang, Y. C., & Wang, N. (2017). Legal system for the development of marine renewable energy in China. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 75, 192-196.
  • Chen, C. & Wei, Y. (2005). Computational Issues for Quantile Regression. Special Issue on Quantile Regression and Related Methods. The Indian Journal of Statistics. 67(2): 399-417. doi: 10.2307/i25053424
  • Christoforidis, T. & Katrakilidis, C. (2021). The dynamic role of ınstitutional quality, renewable and non-renewable energy on the ecological footprint of OECD countries: do institutions and renewables function as leverage points for environmental sustainability?. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 28, 53888-53907.
  • Eşref, C. Luo, L. & Anser, M. H. (2022). Do BRI policy and institutional quality influence economic growth and environmental quality? An empirical analysis from South Asian countries affiliated with the Belt and Road Initiative. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int, 29(6). 8438-8451.
  • Fredriksson P.G, Vollebergh H.R.J & Dijkgraaf, E. (2004). Corruption and energy efficiency in OECD countries: Theory and evidence. J Environ Econ Manag, 47(2), 207-231.
  • Güriş, S. & Şak, N. (2019). Çevresel Kuznets Eğrisi Hipotezinin Toplamsal Olmayan Sabit Etkili Panel Kantil Yöntemiyle İncelenmesi. Business Econ Res J 10(2):327–340.
  • Houran, M., A. & Mehmood, O. (2023). How ınstitutional quality and renewable energy ınteract with ecological footprints: Do the human capital and economic complexity matter in the next eleven nations?. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 1-14.
  • IEA (2020) World Energy Outlook 2020-Analysis - IEA. https:// www.iea.org/reports/world-energy-outlook-2020 (Erişim Tarihi: 21.05.2023).
  • Khan, A. Chenggang, Y. Hussain, J. Bano, S. & Nawaz, A. (2020). Natural resources, tourism development, and energy-growth-CO2 emission nexus: A simultaneity modeling analysis of BRI countries. Resources Policy, 68, 101751.
  • Lau L.S, Choong C.K & Eng Y.K. (2014). Carbon dioxide emission, ınstitutional quality and economic growth: Empirical evidence in Malaysia. Renew Energy, 68, 276-281.
  • Powell, D. (2016). Quantile regression with nonadditive fixed effects‖. Unpublished paper.https://works.bepress.com/david_powell/1/ (05.07.2023 tarihinde erişilmiştir.)
  • Rafei M. Esmaeili. P. & Lorente, D. (2022). A step towards environmental mitigation: How do economic complexity and natural resources matter? Focusing on diferent institutional quality level countries. Resour Policy 78, 102848
  • Rudolph, A. & Figge, L. (2017). Determinants of ecological footprints: What is the role of globalization? Ecol Indic, 81, 348-361.
  • Sabir. S, Qayyum, U & Majeed, T. (2020). FDI and environmental degradation: the role of political institutions in South Asian countries. Environ Sci Pollut Res, 27. 32544-32553
  • Saidi H, El Montasser, G. & Ajmi, A.,N. (2019). The role of institutions in the renewable energy-growth nexus ın the MENA region: A Panel cointegration approach. Environ Model Assess, 252(25), 259-276.
  • Tamazian. A & Bhaskara, R.B. (2010). Do economic, financial and institutional developments matter for environmental degradation? evidence from transitional economies. Energy Econ, 32, 137-145.
  • Udemba, E., N. (2020). Mediation of foreign direct investment and agriculture towards ecological footprint: A Shift from single perspective to a more ınclusive perspective for India. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 27, 26817-26834.
  • Yan, Y., Shah, M.,I., Sharma, G.,D., Chopra, R., Fareed, Z. & Sehzad, O. (2021) Can tourism sustain itself through the pandemic: Nexus between tourism, COVID-19 cases and air quality spread in the ‘Pineapple State’ Hawaii. Curr Issues Tour, 25, 421-440.
  • Yao, X. Yasmeen, R. Hussain, J. & Hassan Shah, W.U. (2021). The repercussions of financial development and corruption on energy efciency and ecological footprint: Evidence from BRICS and NEXT 11 countries. Energy 223, 120063
  • Wang, E.Z & Yang, M. (2022). Green complexity and CO2 emission: Does institutional quality matter? Energy Econ, 110, 106022.
  • Wu, L., & Broadstock, D., C. (2015). Does economic, financial and ınstitutional development matter for renewable energy consumption? Evidence from emerging economies. International Journal of Economic Policy in Emerging Economies, 8(1), 20-39.
  • Yu, K., Lu, Z. & Stander, J. (2003). Quantile regression: applications and current research areas. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series D (The Statistician). 52: 331-350. doi: 10.1111/1467- 9884.00363
  • Zhang, C., Khan, I., Dagar, V., Saeed, A. & Zafar, M., W. (2022). Environmental impact of information and communication technology: Unveiling the role of education in developing countries. Technol Forecast Soc Change, 178, 1-11.
  • 20.06.2023 tarihinde www.footprintnetwork.org adresinden ulaşılmıştır.
  • 21.06.2023 tarihinde https://databank.worldbank.org adresinden ulaşılmıştır.
  • 21.06.2023 tarihinde http://info.worldbank.org/governance/wgi/ adresinden ulaşılmıştır.

Empirical Analysis of the Impact of Institutional Quality on Ecological Footprint: Example of E7 Countries

Yıl 2023, Cilt: 24 Sayı: 4, 636 - 645, 30.10.2023

Nalan Kangal

https://doi.org/10.37880/cumuiibf.1335524
Cited By: 1

Öz

In the study, the effect of two important variables such as institutional quality and renewable energy use on the ecological footprint is analyzed within the scope of sustainable development. In the study, in which China, Brazil, India, Indonesia, Mexico, Russia and Turkey, which are the E7 countries named as emerging economies, were included in the analysis, the data of institutional quality, renewable energy consumption, ecological footprint, exports and GDP per capita for the period 2002-2018 were used. Fixed-effect panel quantile method was used. In the analysis, a negative relationship was found between the Ecological Footprint of Institutional Quality. Increasing Institutional Quality reduces the Ecological Footprint. A positive relationship was found between Renewable Energy Consumption, per capita GDP, exports and Ecological Footprint, which are among the other variables. Based on these results, policy recommendations that countries can implement are listed.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Evvironmental Sustainability Intitunational Quality Ecological Footprint

Kaynakça

  • Acar, T. & Topdağ, D. (2022). OECD ülkelerinde sefalet endeksi ve ekonomik kalkınma ekseninde sağlık harcamalarının belirleyicileri: toplamsal olmayan sabit etkili panel kantil regresyon yaklaşımı. Sosyal Siyaset Konferansları Dergisi. 82: 267-286. https://doi.org/10.26650/jspc.2022.82.946640.
  • Abid, M. (2017). Do economic, financial and institutional developments matter for environmental quality? A comparative analysis of EU and MEA countries. Journal of Environmental Management, 188, 183-194.
  • Adams, S., Klobodu, E. K. M. & Opoku, E. E. O. (2016). Energy consumption, political regime and economic growth in Subsaharan Africa. Energy Policy, 96, 36-44.
  • Bhattacharya, M. Churchill, S.A. & Paramati, S.R. (2017). The dynamic impact of renewable energy and institutions on economic output and CO2 emissions across regio. Renewable Energy, 111, 157-167.
  • Chang, Y. C., & Wang, N. (2017). Legal system for the development of marine renewable energy in China. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 75, 192-196.
  • Chen, C. & Wei, Y. (2005). Computational Issues for Quantile Regression. Special Issue on Quantile Regression and Related Methods. The Indian Journal of Statistics. 67(2): 399-417. doi: 10.2307/i25053424
  • Christoforidis, T. & Katrakilidis, C. (2021). The dynamic role of ınstitutional quality, renewable and non-renewable energy on the ecological footprint of OECD countries: do institutions and renewables function as leverage points for environmental sustainability?. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 28, 53888-53907.
  • Eşref, C. Luo, L. & Anser, M. H. (2022). Do BRI policy and institutional quality influence economic growth and environmental quality? An empirical analysis from South Asian countries affiliated with the Belt and Road Initiative. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int, 29(6). 8438-8451.
  • Fredriksson P.G, Vollebergh H.R.J & Dijkgraaf, E. (2004). Corruption and energy efficiency in OECD countries: Theory and evidence. J Environ Econ Manag, 47(2), 207-231.
  • Güriş, S. & Şak, N. (2019). Çevresel Kuznets Eğrisi Hipotezinin Toplamsal Olmayan Sabit Etkili Panel Kantil Yöntemiyle İncelenmesi. Business Econ Res J 10(2):327–340.
  • Houran, M., A. & Mehmood, O. (2023). How ınstitutional quality and renewable energy ınteract with ecological footprints: Do the human capital and economic complexity matter in the next eleven nations?. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 1-14.
  • IEA (2020) World Energy Outlook 2020-Analysis - IEA. https:// www.iea.org/reports/world-energy-outlook-2020 (Erişim Tarihi: 21.05.2023).
  • Khan, A. Chenggang, Y. Hussain, J. Bano, S. & Nawaz, A. (2020). Natural resources, tourism development, and energy-growth-CO2 emission nexus: A simultaneity modeling analysis of BRI countries. Resources Policy, 68, 101751.
  • Lau L.S, Choong C.K & Eng Y.K. (2014). Carbon dioxide emission, ınstitutional quality and economic growth: Empirical evidence in Malaysia. Renew Energy, 68, 276-281.
  • Powell, D. (2016). Quantile regression with nonadditive fixed effects‖. Unpublished paper.https://works.bepress.com/david_powell/1/ (05.07.2023 tarihinde erişilmiştir.)
  • Rafei M. Esmaeili. P. & Lorente, D. (2022). A step towards environmental mitigation: How do economic complexity and natural resources matter? Focusing on diferent institutional quality level countries. Resour Policy 78, 102848
  • Rudolph, A. & Figge, L. (2017). Determinants of ecological footprints: What is the role of globalization? Ecol Indic, 81, 348-361.
  • Sabir. S, Qayyum, U & Majeed, T. (2020). FDI and environmental degradation: the role of political institutions in South Asian countries. Environ Sci Pollut Res, 27. 32544-32553
  • Saidi H, El Montasser, G. & Ajmi, A.,N. (2019). The role of institutions in the renewable energy-growth nexus ın the MENA region: A Panel cointegration approach. Environ Model Assess, 252(25), 259-276.
  • Tamazian. A & Bhaskara, R.B. (2010). Do economic, financial and institutional developments matter for environmental degradation? evidence from transitional economies. Energy Econ, 32, 137-145.
  • Udemba, E., N. (2020). Mediation of foreign direct investment and agriculture towards ecological footprint: A Shift from single perspective to a more ınclusive perspective for India. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 27, 26817-26834.
  • Yan, Y., Shah, M.,I., Sharma, G.,D., Chopra, R., Fareed, Z. & Sehzad, O. (2021) Can tourism sustain itself through the pandemic: Nexus between tourism, COVID-19 cases and air quality spread in the ‘Pineapple State’ Hawaii. Curr Issues Tour, 25, 421-440.
  • Yao, X. Yasmeen, R. Hussain, J. & Hassan Shah, W.U. (2021). The repercussions of financial development and corruption on energy efciency and ecological footprint: Evidence from BRICS and NEXT 11 countries. Energy 223, 120063
  • Wang, E.Z & Yang, M. (2022). Green complexity and CO2 emission: Does institutional quality matter? Energy Econ, 110, 106022.
  • Wu, L., & Broadstock, D., C. (2015). Does economic, financial and ınstitutional development matter for renewable energy consumption? Evidence from emerging economies. International Journal of Economic Policy in Emerging Economies, 8(1), 20-39.
  • Yu, K., Lu, Z. & Stander, J. (2003). Quantile regression: applications and current research areas. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series D (The Statistician). 52: 331-350. doi: 10.1111/1467- 9884.00363
  • Zhang, C., Khan, I., Dagar, V., Saeed, A. & Zafar, M., W. (2022). Environmental impact of information and communication technology: Unveiling the role of education in developing countries. Technol Forecast Soc Change, 178, 1-11.
  • 20.06.2023 tarihinde www.footprintnetwork.org adresinden ulaşılmıştır.
  • 21.06.2023 tarihinde https://databank.worldbank.org adresinden ulaşılmıştır.
  • 21.06.2023 tarihinde http://info.worldbank.org/governance/wgi/ adresinden ulaşılmıştır.
Toplam 30 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil Türkçe
Konular Ekonomi Teorisi (Diğer), Politika ve Yönetim (Diğer)
Bölüm Makaleler
Yazarlar

Nalan Kangal 0000-0001-9160-0797

Erken Görünüm Tarihi 25 Ekim 2023
Yayımlanma Tarihi 30 Ekim 2023
Gönderilme Tarihi 31 Temmuz 2023
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2023 Cilt: 24 Sayı: 4

Kaynak Göster

APA Kangal, N. (2023). Kurumsal Kalitenin Ekolojik Ayak İzi Üzerine Etkisinin Ampirik Analizi: E7 Ülkeleri Örneği. Cumhuriyet Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi, 24(4), 636-645. https://doi.org/10.37880/cumuiibf.1335524

Cited By

Türkiye’de yapay ışık kirliliği ile kuş gözlemleri arasındaki ilişkinin zamansal ve mekânsal analizi: Jeoistatistiksel bir yaklaşım
lnternational Journal of Geography and Geography Education
https://doi.org/10.32003/igge.1430386
 Kapak Resmi İndir

Cumhuriyet Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi Creative Commons Atıf-GayriTicari 4.0 Uluslararası Lisansı (CC BY NC) ile lisanslanmıştır.