Mali Yerelleşme ve Çevre: Yarış Dibe mi Zirveye mi? OECD Ülkelerinden Ampirik Kanıtlar

Mehmet Avcı; Arınç Boz

doi:10.37880/cumuiibf.1517034

EN TR

Fiscal Decentralization and Environment: Race to the Bottom or to the Top? Empirical Evidence from OECD Countries

Öz

According to the Global Risks Report Survey data, environmental problems, which are among the most substantial problems that the world will face in the short and long term, are a serious issue in terms of the sustainability of public finances. Fiscal decentralization, which refers to the sharing of fiscal authority with sub-national units, is typically examined within the framework of the economic growth literature. According to the traditional approach, there is a positive relationship between fiscal decentralization and economic growth. So fiscal decentralization increases economic growth. So fiscal decentralization contributes to economic growth. However, in today's context where the concept of sustainable development has gained importance, the environmental effects of fiscal decentralization are being neglected. The theory explains the environmental effects of fiscal decentralization with two hypotheses. The race to the bottom hypothesis suggests that fiscal decentralization increases environmental degradation, while the race to the top hypothesis argues that fiscal decentralization reduces environmental degradation. In this regard, in this study, the impact of fiscal decentralization on environmental degradation is investigated within the hypotheses of race to the bottom and race to the top for 18 OECD countries during the period 2000-2020 using the cointegration technique. OECD countries are generally industrialized countries and have a significant impact on world CO2 emissions. The findings indicate that expenditure decentralization increases environmental degradation. This suggests that the hypothesis of racing to the bottom is valid concerning the environmental effects of fiscal decentralization in OECD countries. A probable reason for these findings is that local administrations carry out 55% of public expenditures on transportation, urbanization and infrastructure sectors directly related to environmental degradation in OECD countries.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Mali Yerelleşme ve Çevre: Yarış Dibe mi Zirveye mi? OECD Ülkelerinden Ampirik Kanıtlar

Öz

Küresel Risk Algılama Anketi verilerine göre kısa ve uzun vadede dünyanın karşılaşacağı en önemli sorunlar arasında gösterilen çevresel sorunlar, kamu maliyesinin sürdürülebilirliği bakımından ciddi bir konu olma özelliğine sahiptir. Mali otoritenin alt idari birimler ile paylaşımını konu edinen mali yerelleşme, genellikle ekonomik büyüme literatürü çerçevesinde incelenmektedir. Geleneksel yaklaşıma göre mali yerelleşme ekonomik büyümeye arasında pozitif yönlü bir ilişki vardır. Yani mali yerelleşme ekonomik büyümeyi artırmaktadır. Buna karşın sürdürülebilir kalkınma kavramının önem kazandığı günümüzde mali yerelleşmenin çevresel etkileri ihmal edilmektedir. Teori mali yerelleşmenin çevresel etkilerini iki hipotez ile açıklamaktadır. Dibe doğru yarış hipotezi mali yerelleşmenin çevresel bozulmayı artırdığını ileri sürerken, zirveye doğru yarış hipotezi ise mali yerelleşmenin çevresel bozulmayı azalttığını savunmaktadır. Bu bağlamda bu çalışmada mali yerelleşmenin çevresel bozulma üzerindeki etkisi dibe doğru yarış ve zirveye doğru yarış hipotezleri çerçevesinde 18 OECD ülkesinde 2000-2020 dönemi için eşbütünleşme tekniği ile araştırılmaktadır. OECD ülkeleri genellikle sanayileşmiş ülkeler olup, dünyadaki CO2 salınımında önemli düzeyde etkilere sahiptir. Elde edilen bulgulara göre OECD ülkeleri için harcama yerelleşmesi çevresel bozulmayı artırmaktadır. Bu, OECD ülkelerinde mali yerelleşmenin çevresel etkileri bakımından dibe doğru yarış hipotezinin geçerli olduğunu göstermektedir. Bu bulguların ortaya çıkmasında OECD ülkelerinde çevresel bozulma ile direkt ilgili ulaşım, kentleşme ve altyapı sektörlerine dönük kamusal harcamaların %55’ini yerel idarelerin gerçekleştiriyor olması muhtemel bir gerekçe olarak gösterilebilir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Destekleyen Kurum

Yok

Etik Beyan

Araştırma etik kurul gerektirmeyen bir araştırmadır.

Teşekkür

Yok

Kaynakça

Ahmad, E., & Brosio, G. (2006). Introduction: fiscal federalism: A review of developments in the literature and policy.E. Ahmad, & Brosio(Ed.), Handbook of fiscal federalism (s. 1-32) içinde. Edward Elgar Publishing Limited: UK ve US.
Ahmad, F., Xu, H., Draz, M. U., Ozturk, I., Chandio, A. A., Wang, Y., & Zhang, D. (2021). The case of China’s fiscal decentralization and eco-efficiency: Is it worthwhile or just a bootless errand?. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 26, 89-100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2020.09.014
Ahmad, M., & Satrovic, E. (2023). Relating fiscal decentralization and financial inclusion to environmental sustainability: criticality of natural resources. Journal of Environmental Management, 325 (116633), 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1016 /j.jenvman.2022.116633
Ahmed, N., Hamid, Z., Rehman, K. U., Senkus, P., Khan, N. A., Wysokińska- Senkus, A., & Hadryjańska, B. (2023). Environmental regulation, fiscal decentralization, and agricultural carbon intensity: A challenge to ecological sustainability policies in the United States. Sustainability, 15(5145), 1-21. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15065145
Ansari, M. A., Haider, S., & Khan, N. A. (2020). Environmental Kuznets Curve revisited: An analysis using ecological and material footprint. Ecological Indicators, 115(106416), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2020.106416
Avcı, M. (2023). Çevresel bozulmayı önlemede mali yerelleşme iyi bir strateji midir? Türkiye’den ampirik kanıtlar. G. G. Göksu & E. Eroğlu (Ed.), Kamu maliye politikalari perspektifinden çevresel sürdürülebilir kalkınma (s. 165-202) içinde. Ankara: Sayıştay Yayınları. Avcı, M., & Karasoy, H. A. (2021). How does fiscal decentralization affect fiscal and governance-related performance?: Evidence from OECD countries by dynamic panel data analysis. C. Babaoğlu, E. Akman & O. Kulaç (Ed.), Handbook of research on global challenges for improving public services and government operations (s. 409-426) içinde, IGI Global.
Bahl, R. (1999). Fiscal decentralization as development policy. Public Budgeting & Finance, 19(2), 59-75. https://doi. org/10.1046/j.0275-1100.1999.01163.x
Bahl, R., & Bird, R. M. (2018). Fiscal decentralization and local finance in developing countries. Edward Elgar Publishing.

Breusch, T. S., & Pagan, A. R. (1980). The lagrange multiplier test and its applications to model specification in econometrics. The Review of Economic Studies, 47(1), 239-253. https://doi.org/10.2307/2297111
Cai, H., Tong, Z., Xu, S., Chen, S., Zhu, P., & Liu, W. (2022). Fiscal decentralization, government behavior, and environmental pollution: Evidence from China. Frontiers in Environmental Science, 10(901079), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs. 2022.901079
Chen, X., & Chang, C. P. (2020). Fiscal decentralization, environmental regulation, and pollution: A spatial investigation. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 27(25), 31946-31968. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-09522-5
Chen, X., & Liu, J. (2020). Fiscal decentralization and environmental pollution: A spatial analysis. Discrete Dynamics in Nature and Society, 9254150 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/9254150
Cheng, S., Fan, W., Chen, J., Meng, F., Liu, G., Song, M., & Yang, Z. (2020). The impact of fiscal decentralization on CO2 emissions in China. Energy, 192(116685), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2019.116685
Cheng, Y., Awan, U., Ahmad, S., & Tan, Z. (2021). How do technological innovation and fiscal decentralization affect the environment? A story of the fourth industrial revolution and sustainable growth. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 162(120398), 1-6. https://doi.org/10.1016 /j.techfore.2020.120398
Dalmazzone, S. (2006). Decentralization and the environment. E. Ahmad & G. Brosio (Ed.), Handbook of fiscal federalism (s. 459-477) içinde. Edward Elgar Publishing Limited: UK & US.
Eberhardt, M., & Teal, F. (2010). Productivity analysis in global manufacturing production. Oxford Department of Economics Discussion Paper Series, (515), 1-27. https://ora.ox.ac.uk /objects/uuid:ea831625-9014-40ec-abc5-516ecfbd2118
Ejobowah, J. B. (2018). The second-generation theory of fiscal federalism: A critical evaluation. Perspectives on Federalism Journal, 10(1), 219-242. DOI: 10.2478/pof-2018-0011
Faguet, J. P. (2000). Decentralization and local government performance: Improving public services provision in Bolivia. Revista de Economía del Rosario, 3(1), 127-176. http://revistas.urosario.edu.co/index.php/economia/article/view/991/890
Grossman, G. M., & Krueger, A. B. (1991). Environmental impacts of a North American free trade agreement. National Bureau of Economic Research, 3914, 1-39. DOI 10.3386/w3914
Han, Y. (2023). Promoting green economy efficiency through fiscal decentralization and environmental regulation. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 30(5), 11675-11688. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-22952-7
Hao, Y., Chen, Y. F., Liao, H., & Wei, Y. M. (2019). China’s fiscal decentralization and environmental quality: Theory and an empirical study. Environment and Development Economics, 25, 1-23. doi:10.1017/S1355770X19000263
Hawari, A., Alyasa, F. M., Akbar, M. R., & Sihaloho, E. D. (2024). Fiscal decentralization in Indonesia: Does it curb the quality of environment?. Journal of Economics Research and Social Sciences, 8(1), 24-37. https://doi.org/10.18196/jerss.v8i1. 19273
He, Q., Deng, X., Li, C., Yan, Z., Kong, F., & Qi, Y. (2022). The green paradox puzzle: Fiscal decentralisation, environmental regulation, and agricultural carbon intensity in China. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 29(51), 78009-78028. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-21149-2
Hoang, D.P., Chu, L.K., & To, T.T. (2024). Exploring the nexus between fiscal decentralization and ecological sustainability: A fresh perspective from the moderating role of geopolitical risk and updated international evidence. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 31, 15689–15715. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-024-31989-9
Hu, B., Guo, M., & Zhang, S. (2023). The role of fiscal decentralization and natural resources markets in environmental sustainability in OECD. Resources Policy, 85(103855), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2023. 103855
Huang, F. (2023). How does trade and fiscal decentralization leads to green growth: Role of renewable energy development. Renewable Energy, 214, 334-341. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2023.05.116
Inman, R. P. (2003). Transfers and bailouts: enforcing local fiscal discipline with lessons from US federalism. J. Rodden, G. S. Eskeland & J. Litvack (Ed.), Fiscal decentralization and the challenge of hard budget constraints (s. 165-202) içinde. London: MIT Press.
Khan, Z., Ali, S., Dong, K., & Li, R. Y. M. (2021). How does fiscal decentralization affect CO2 emissions? The roles of institutions and human capital. Energy Economics, 94(105060), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2020. 105060
Kim, A. (2008). Decentralization and the provision of public services: Framework and implementation. World Bank Publications. Policy Research Working Paper, 4503, 1-25. https://doi.org/10.1596/1813-9450-4503
Kim, D. R. (2011). Do local policy networks deter the race to the bottom in environmental regulation? The case of South Korea. Environment and Planning C, 29(6), 1037-1053. https://doi.org/10.1068/c1158j
Konisky, D. M., & Woods, N. D. (2012). Environmental free riding in state water pollution enforcement. State Politics & Policy Quarterly, 12(3), 227-251. https://www.jstor.org/stable /24710884
Kornai, J. (1980). “Hard” and “Soft” Budget Constraint. Acta Oeconomica, 25 (3/4), 231-245. https://www.jstor.org /stable/40728773
Li, J., & Xu, Y. (2023). Does fiscal decentralization support green economy development? Evidence from China. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 30(14), 41460-41472. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-023-25240-0
Li, X., Younas, M. Z., Andlib, Z., Ullah, S., Sohail, S., & Hafeez, M. (2021). Examining the asymmetric effects of pakistan’s fiscal decentralization on economic growth and environmental quality. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 28, 5666-5681. DOI: 10.1007/s11356-020-10876-z
Lingyan, M., Zhao, Z., Malik, H. A., Razzaq, A., An, H., & Hassan, M. (2021). Asymmetric impact of fiscal decentralization and environmental innovation on carbon emissions: Evidence from highly decentralized countries. Energy & Environment, 33(4), 1-31. https://doi.org/10.1177/0958305X211018453
Liu, F., Feng, J., Zhai, G., & Razzaq, A. (2022). Influence of fiscal decentralization and renewable energy investment on ecological sustainability in EU: What is the moderating role of institutional governance?. Renewable Energy, 200, 1265-1274. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2022.10.036
Liu, L., & Li, L. (2019). Effects of fiscal decentralisation on the environment: New evidence from China. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 26(36), 36878-36886. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-019-06818-z
Lockwood, B. (2008). Voting, lobbying, and the decentralization theorem. Economics & Politics, 20(3), 416-431. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0343.2008.00340.x
Martínez‐Vázquez, J., Lago‐Peñas, S., & Sacchi, A. (2017). The impact of fiscal decentralization: A survey. Journal of Economic Surveys, 31(4), 1095-1129. https://doi.org/10. 1111 /joes.12182
Memon, J.A., Ali, M., & Wang, Y. (2022). Does fiscal decentralization curb the ecological footprint in Pakistan?. Frontiers in Environmental Science, 10(964212), 1-8. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2022.964212
Miao, Q., Shi, Y., & Davlasheridze, M. (2021). Fiscal decentralization and natural disaster mitigation: Evidence from the United States. Public Budgeting & Finance, 41(1), 26-50. https://doi.org/10.1111/pbaf.12273
Mishra, B. R., Arjun & Tiwari, A. K. (2023). Exploring the asymmetric effect of fiscal decentralization on economic growth and environmental quality: Evidence from India. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 30, 80192-80209. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-023-28009-7
Mukiyen Avcı, G. (2023). Environmental impact of foreign direct investment in Türkiye: Does the quality of institutions matter? Evidence from time series analysis using the fourier extension. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-023-29964-x
Musgrave, R. (1959). Public finance. McGraw–Hill.
Norregaard, J. (1995). Intergovernmental fiscal relations. P. Shome (Ed.), Tax policy handbook (s. 247-253) içinde. International Monetary Fund.
Oates, W. E. (1972). Fiscal federalism. Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
Oates, W. E. (1999). An essay on fiscal federalism. Journal of Economic Literature, 37(3), 1120-1149. https://www.jstor. org/stable/2564874
Oates, W. E. (2001). A reconsideration of environmental federalism. Recent Advances in Environmental Economics, Discussion Paper, 01-54, 1-32. https://media.rff.org/ documents/RFF-DP-01-54.pdf
Oates, W. E. (2005). Toward a second-generation theory of fiscal federalism. International Tax and Public Finance, 12, 349-373. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10797-005-1619-9
Oates, W. E. (2008). On the evolution of fiscal federalism: Theory and institutions. National Tax Journal, 61(2), 313-334. https://www.jstor.org/stable/41790447
Oates, W. E., & Portney, P. R. (2003). The political economy of environmental policy. G. M. Mäler, & J. R. Vincent (Ed.), Handbook of environmental economics (s. 325-354) içinde. Elsevier.
OECD (2020). Managing environmental and energy transitions for regions and cities. OECD Publishing, Paris. https://doi.org/10.1787/f0c6621f-en
OECD (2023). Building financial resilience to climate impacts: A framework for governments to manage the risks of losses and damages. OECD Publishing, 1-132. https://www.oecd. org/environment/building-financial-resilience-to-climate-impacts-9e2e1412-en.htm
OECD (2024). Localising the SDGs in a changing landscape. OECD Regional Development Papers, 68, 1-46. https://www.oecd.org/cfe/localising-the-sdgs-in-a-changing-landscape-a76810d7-en.htm
Olson, M. (1969). The principle of “fiscal equivalence”: The division of responsibilities among different levels of government. The American Economic Review, 59(2), 479-487. https://www.jstor.org/stable/1823700
Pesaran, M. H. (2004). General diagnostic tests for cross section dependence in panels. https://ssrn.com/abstract=572504
Pesaran, M. H. (2006). Estimation and inference in large heterogeneous panels with a multifactor error structure. Econometrica, 74(4), 967-1012. https://doi.org/10.1111 /j.1468- 0262.2006.00692.x
Pesaran, M. H. (2007). A simple panel unit root test in the presence of cross‐section dependence. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 22(2), 265-312. https://doi.org/10.1002/ jae.951
Pesaran, M. H., & Yamagata, T. (2008). Testing slope homogeneity in large panels. Journal of Econometrics, 142(1), 50-93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeconom.2007.05. 010
Pesaran, M. H., Ullah, A., & Yamagata, T. (2008). A bias‐adjusted LM test of error cross‐section independence. The Econometrics Journal, 11(1), 105-127. https://doi.org/ 10.1111/j.1368-423X.2007.00227.x
Prud’homme, R. (1995). The dangers of decentralization. Oxford Journals, 10(2), 201–220. https://doi.org/10.1093/wbro/ 10.2.201
Qian, Y., & Weingast, B. R. (1997). Federalism as a commitment to preserving market incentives. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 11(4), 83-92. https://www.jstor.org/stable/ 2138464
Qian, Y., & Roland, G. (1998). Federalism and the soft budget constraint. American Economic Review, 88(5), 1143-1162. https://www.jstor.org/stable/116864
Qiao, G., Yang, D., Ahmad, M., & Ahmed, Z. (2022). Modeling for insights: Does fiscal decentralization impede ecological footprint?. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(10146), 1-18. https://doi.org/ 10.3390/ijerph191610146
Rodden, J., Eskeland, G. S., & Litvack, J. I. , (2003). Introduction and overview. J. Rodden, G. S. Eskeland & J. Litvack (Ed.), Fiscal decentralization and the challenge of hard budget constraints (s. 3-31) içinde. London: MIT Press.
Safi, A., Wang, Q. S., & Wahab, S. (2022). Revisiting the nexus between fiscal decentralization and environment: Evidence from fiscally decentralized economies. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 29(38), 58053-58064. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-19860-1
Satrovic, E., Zafar, M. W., & Suntraruk, P. (2024). Achieving ecological sustainability in European Union: The role of fiscal decentralization and green innovation. Journal of Cleaner Production, 141316. 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro. 2024.141316
Seabright, P. (1996). Accountability and decentralisation in government: An incomplete contracts model. European Economic Review, 40(1), 61–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/ 0014-2921(95)00055-0
Shahzad, F., & Fareed, Z. (2023). Examining the relationship between fiscal decentralization, renewable energy intensity, and carbon footprints in Canada by using the newly constructed bootstrap fourier Granger causality test in quantile”, Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 30(2), 4617-4626. DOI: 10.1007/s11356-022-22513-y
Shao, S., & Razzaq, A. (2022). Does composite fiscal decentralization reduce trade-adjusted resource consumption through institutional governance, human capital and infrastructure development?. Resources Policy, 79(103034), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2022. 103034
Su, C. W., Umar, M., & Khan, Z. (2021). Does fiscal decentralization and eco-innovation promote renewable energy consumption? Analyzing the role of political risk. Science of the Total Environment, 751(142220), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.142220
Sun, Y., Guan, W., Razzaq, A., Shahzad, M., & An, N. B. (2022). Transition towards ecological sustainability through fiscal decentralization, renewable energy and green investment in OECD countries. Renewable Energy, 190, 385-395. DOI: 10.1016/j.renene.2022.03.099
Tanzi, V. (1995). Fiscal federalism and decentralization: A review of some efficiency and macroeconomic aspects. M. Bruno & B. Pleskovic (Ed.), Annual conference on development economics (s. 295-316) içinde. Washington: World Bank.
Ter-Minassian, T. (1997). Intergovernmental fiscal relations in a macroeconomic perspective: An overview. T. Ter-Minassian (Ed.), Fiscal federalism in theory and practice (s. 3-24) içinde. International Monetary Fund.
The Phan, C., Jain, V., Purnomo, E. P., Islam, M. M., Mughal, N., Guerrero, J. W. G., & Ullah, S. (2021). Controlling environmental pollution: Dynamic role of fiscal decentralization in co2 emission in Asian economies. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 28, 65150-65159. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-15256-9
Tiebout, C. M. (1956). A pure theory of local expenditures. Journal of Political Economy, 64(5), 416-424. https://www.jstor.org/stable/1826343
Tufail, M., Song, L., Adebayo, T. S., Kirikkaleli, D., & Khan, S. (2021). Do fiscal decentralization and natural resources rent curb carbon emissions? Evidence from developed countries. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 28(35), 49179-49190. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-13865-y
Udeagha, M. C., & Breitenbach, M. C. (2023). Can fiscal decentralization be the route to the race to zero emissions in South Africa? Fresh policy insights from novel dynamic autoregressive distributed lag simulations approach. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 30(16), 46446-46474. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-023-25306-z
Udeagha, M. C., & Ngepah, N. (2023). Striving towards environmental sustainability in the BRICS economies: The combined influence of fiscal decentralization and environmental innovation. International Journal of Sustainable Development & World Ecology, 30(2), 111-125. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504509.2022.2123411
United Nations. (2023). Conferences Environment and Sustainable Development. https://www. un.org/en/ conferences/environment/stockholm1972, (Erişim Tarihi: 23.01.2024).
Vo, D. H. (2010). The economics of fiscal decentralization. Journal of Economic Surveys, 24(4), 657-679. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6419.2009.00600.x
Wallis, J. J., & Oates, W. E. (1988). Decentralization in the public sector: An empirical study of state and local government. H. S. Rosen (Ed.), Fiscal federalism: Quantitative studies (s. 5-32) içinde. University of Chicago Press.
World Development Indicator (2024). Urban Population Data, https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/SP.URB.TOTL.IN.ZS?locations=OE, (Erişim Tarihi: 05.09.2024).
World Economic Forum. (2023, 11 January). The global risks report 2023, https://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_Global _Risks_Report_2023.pdf, (Erişim Tarihi: 24.04.2024)
Weingast, B. R. (2009). Second generation fiscal federalism: The implications of fiscal incentives. Journal of Urban Economics, 65(3), 279-293. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jue.2008.12.005
Weingast, B. R. (2014). Second generation fiscal federalism: Political aspects of decentralization and economic development. World Development, 53, 14-25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2013.01.003
Westerlund, J., & Edgerton, D. L. (2007). A panel bootstrap cointegration test. Economics Letters, 97(3), 185-190. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2007.03.003
Westerlund, J. (2008). Panel cointegration tests of the Fisher effect. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 23(2), 193-233. https://doi.org/10.1002/jae.967
Wu, H., Qiu, Y., Li, X., Fan, M., Wan, K., & Zhang, M. (2023). The drivers of carbon emissions in China: The perspective of fiscal decentralization. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 30, 65879-65891. https://doi.org/10.1007/ s11356-023-27001-5
Xia, J., Li, R. Y. M., Zhan, X., Song, L., & Bai, W. (2022). A study on the impact of fiscal decentralization on carbon emissions with U-shape and regulatory effect. Frontiers in Environmental Science, 10(964327), 1-14. https://doi.org /10.3389/fenvs.2022.964327
Yuan, R., Li, C., Memon, J. A., Ali, M., & Nawaz, M. A. (2022). The nexus between fiscal decentralization and environmental sustainability in Japan. Frontiers in Environmental Science, 10(905461), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2022. 905461
Zhang, C., Zhou, D., Wang, Q., Ding, H., & Zhao, S. (2022). Will fiscal decentralization stimulate renewable energy development? Evidence from China. Energy Policy, 164(112893), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2022. 112893
Zhao, L., Shao, K., & Ye, J. (2022). The impact of fiscal decentralization on environmental pollution and the transmission mechanism based on promotion incentive perspective”, Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 29(57), 86634-86650. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-21762-1

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil

Türkçe

Konular

Politika ve Yönetim (Diğer)

Bölüm

Araştırma Makalesi

Yazarlar

Mehmet Avcı
0000-0002-5672-4142
Türkiye

Arınç Boz ^*
0000-0002-4936-1339
Türkiye

Erken Görünüm Tarihi

28 Ekim 2024

Yayımlanma Tarihi

30 Ekim 2024

Gönderilme Tarihi

16 Temmuz 2024

Kabul Tarihi

13 Eylül 2024

Yayımlandığı Sayı

Yıl 2024 Cilt: 25 Sayı: 4

DOI

https://doi.org/10.37880/cumuiibf.1517034

IZ

https://izlik.org/JA98AP83LD

Kaynak Göster

RIS / Bibtex

APA

Avcı, M., & Boz, A. (2024). Mali Yerelleşme ve Çevre: Yarış Dibe mi Zirveye mi? OECD Ülkelerinden Ampirik Kanıtlar. Cumhuriyet Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi, 25(4), 605-619. https://doi.org/10.37880/cumuiibf.1517034

AMA

1.Avcı M, Boz A. Mali Yerelleşme ve Çevre: Yarış Dibe mi Zirveye mi? OECD Ülkelerinden Ampirik Kanıtlar. Cumhuriyet Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi. 2024;25(4):605-619. doi:10.37880/cumuiibf.1517034

Chicago

Avcı, Mehmet, ve Arınç Boz. 2024. “Mali Yerelleşme ve Çevre: Yarış Dibe mi Zirveye mi? OECD Ülkelerinden Ampirik Kanıtlar”. Cumhuriyet Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi 25 (4): 605-19. https://doi.org/10.37880/cumuiibf.1517034.

EndNote

Avcı M, Boz A (01 Ekim 2024) Mali Yerelleşme ve Çevre: Yarış Dibe mi Zirveye mi? OECD Ülkelerinden Ampirik Kanıtlar. Cumhuriyet Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi 25 4 605–619.

IEEE

[1]M. Avcı ve A. Boz, “Mali Yerelleşme ve Çevre: Yarış Dibe mi Zirveye mi? OECD Ülkelerinden Ampirik Kanıtlar”, Cumhuriyet Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi, c. 25, sy 4, ss. 605–619, Eki. 2024, doi: 10.37880/cumuiibf.1517034.

ISNAD

Avcı, Mehmet - Boz, Arınç. “Mali Yerelleşme ve Çevre: Yarış Dibe mi Zirveye mi? OECD Ülkelerinden Ampirik Kanıtlar”. Cumhuriyet Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi 25/4 (01 Ekim 2024): 605-619. https://doi.org/10.37880/cumuiibf.1517034.

JAMA

1.Avcı M, Boz A. Mali Yerelleşme ve Çevre: Yarış Dibe mi Zirveye mi? OECD Ülkelerinden Ampirik Kanıtlar. Cumhuriyet Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi. 2024;25:605–619.

MLA

Avcı, Mehmet, ve Arınç Boz. “Mali Yerelleşme ve Çevre: Yarış Dibe mi Zirveye mi? OECD Ülkelerinden Ampirik Kanıtlar”. Cumhuriyet Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi, c. 25, sy 4, Ekim 2024, ss. 605-19, doi:10.37880/cumuiibf.1517034.

Vancouver

1.Mehmet Avcı, Arınç Boz. Mali Yerelleşme ve Çevre: Yarış Dibe mi Zirveye mi? OECD Ülkelerinden Ampirik Kanıtlar. Cumhuriyet Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi. 01 Ekim 2024;25(4):605-19. doi:10.37880/cumuiibf.1517034