THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN SUSTAINABILITY PRACTICES AND LOGISTICS PERFORMANCE: A META-ANALYSIS STUDY

Ahmet İlbaş

doi:10.37880/cumuiibf.1811553

EN TR

THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN SUSTAINABILITY PRACTICES AND LOGISTICS PERFORMANCE: A META-ANALYSIS STUDY

Abstract

Confronted with intensifying regulatory frameworks and evolving stakeholder expectations, the integration of sustainability into supply chain management is now a strategic necessity. Logistics performance, a critical barometer of supply chain effectiveness evaluated through cost, timeliness, and reliability metrics, is significantly impacted by the depth of sustainability integration within corporate strategy. While the body of empirical research exploring this nexus has expanded, findings remain disparate, underscoring the need for a consolidated, quantitative synthesis. This study employs a meta-analytical approach to statistically aggregate empirical evidence concerning the relationship between sustainability practices and logistics performance. A systematic review of major academic databases was conducted, applying stringent inclusion criteria that resulted in the selection of five studies providing quantitative correlation data. The analysis reveals a positive and moderately strong correlation between sustainability practices and logistics performance, with a pooled correlation coefficient of r = 0.439 (p < 0,001). This robust finding confirms that sustainability-oriented strategies—such as green procurement, eco-friendly packaging, and transportation optimization—significantly enhance logistics efficiency, cost-effectiveness, and market competitiveness. Analyses for heterogeneity and publication bias further corroborated the reliability of these results. In conclusion, this study provides compelling quantitative evidence that embedding sustainability into logistics operations constitutes a synergistic strategy, simultaneously advancing ecological objectives and fortifying organizational resilience. The findings furnish a valuable evidence-based framework for managers and policymakers dedicated to constructing more efficient, robust, and environmentally sound supply chains. Keywords: Sustainability, Logistics Performance, Meta-Analysis, Strategic Management.

Keywords

Sürdürülebilirlik Uygulamaları ve Lojistik Performans Arasındaki İlişki: Bir Meta-Analiz İncelemesi

Öz

Sürdürülebilirlik uygulamaları, modern lojistiğin temel taşlarından biri haline gelerek operasyonel verimlilik, çevresel sorumluluk ve rekabetçi konumlanmayı derinden etkilemektedir. Artan düzenleyici çerçeveler ve paydaş beklentileri, sürdürülebilirliğin tedarik zinciri yönetimine entegrasyonunu stratejik bir gereklilik haline getirmiştir. Maliyet, zamanlılık ve güvenilirlik metrikleriyle ölçülen lojistik performans, kurumsal stratejide sürdürülebilirliğin içselleştirilme derecesinden önemli ölçüde etkilenmektedir. Bu ilişkiyi inceleyen ampirik araştırmalar artsa da, bulguların tutarsızlığı, konsolide ve nicel bir senteze duyulan ihtiyacı ortaya koymaktadır. Bu çalışma, sürdürülebilirlik uygulamaları ile lojistik performans arasındaki ilişkiye dair ampirik kanıtları istatistiksel olarak birleştirmek için meta-analitik bir yaklaşım benimsemektedir. Büyük akademik veri tabanlarında yapılan sistematik tarama ve katı dahil etme kriterleri sonucunda, nicel korelasyon verisi sunan beş çalışma analize dâhil edilmiştir. Analiz, sürdürülebilirlik uygulamaları ile lojistik performans arasında pozitif yönde ve orta düzeyde güçlü bir ilişki olduğunu ortaya koymaktadır (toplu korelasyon katsayısı r = 0,439, p < 0,001). Bu güçlü bulgu, yeşil tedarik, çevre dostu ambalajlama ve taşıma optimizasyonu gibi sürdürülebilirlik odaklı stratejilerin lojistik verimliliği, maliyet etkinliği ve pazar rekabet gücünü önemli ölçüde artırdığını doğrulamaktadır. Heterojenlik ve yayın yanlılığı analizleri sonuçların güvenilirliğini desteklemiştir. Sonuç olarak, bu çalışma, sürdürülebilirliğin lojistik operasyonlara entegre edilmesinin, ekolojik hedefler ile örgütsel dayanıklılığı aynı anda güçlendiren sinerjik bir strateji olduğuna dair ikna edici nicel kanıtlar sunmakta ve daha verimli, sağlam ve çevreci tedarik zincirleri inşa etmek isteyen yönetici ve politika yapıcılar için değerli bir kanıta dayalı çerçeve sunmaktadır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Etik Beyan

Bu çalışma, daha önce yayımlanmış akademik araştırmalardan elde edilen ikincil verilerin sistematik biçimde analizine dayanmaktadır. Araştırmada herhangi bir insan katılımcı, deneysel uygulama, anket veya gözlem yapılmadığından dolayı etik kurul onayı gerekmemektedir. Tüm veriler açık kaynaklı ve kamuya açık bilimsel yayınlardan elde edilmiştir. Çalışmanın yürütülmesinde bilimsel araştırma ve yayın etiğine uygun davranılmıştır.

Kaynakça

Ahi, P., & Searcy, C. (2013). A comparative literature analysis of definitions for green and sustainable supply chain management. Journal of Cleaner Production, 52, 329–341. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.02.018
Ahi, P., & Searcy, C. (2015). An analysis of metrics used to measure performance in green and sustainable supply chains. Journal of Cleaner Production, 86 (1), 360–377. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.08.005
Arvis, J.-F., Mustra, M. A., Panzer, J., Ojala, L., & Naula, T. (2007). Connecting to compete: Trade logistics in the global economy. World Bank, Washington DC. http://www.worldbank.org/lpi
Arvis, J.-F., Mustra, M. A., Ojala, L., Shepherd, B., & Saslavsky, D. (2010). Connecting to compete 2010: Trade logistics in the global economy. World Bank. http://hdl.handle.net/10986/24599
Arvis, J.-F., Ojala, L., Wiederer, C., Shepherd, B., Raj, A., Dairabayeva, K., & Kiiski, T. (2018). Connecting to compete 2018: Trade logistics in the global economy. World Bank. http://hdl.handle.net/10986/29971
Bayraktutan, Y., & Özbilgin, M. (2013). Türkiye’de iller düzeyinde karayolu yük trafiği dağılımının analizi. Çukurova Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 17(2), 81–92.
Bayraktutan, Y., & Özbilgin, M. (2014). Türkiye’de illerin lojistik merkez yatırım düzeylerinin bulanık mantık yöntemiyle belirlenmesi. Erciyes Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 4,136.
Carter, C. R., & Rogers, D. S. (2008). A framework of sustainable supply chain management: Moving toward new theory. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 38(5), 360–387. https://doi.org/10.1108/09600030810882816

Cochran, W. G. (1954). The combination of estimates from different experiments. Biometrics, 10(1), 101–129. https://doi.org/10.2307/3001666
Dekker, R., Bloemhof, J., & Mallidis, I. (2012). Operations Research for green logistics–An overview of aspects, issues, contributions and challenges. European Journal of Operational Research, 219(3), 671–679. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2011.11.010
Elkington, J. (2000). Cannibals with forks: The triple bottom line of 21st century business. Journal of Business Ethics, 23(2):229-231. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006129603978
Ellison, O., Nuertey, D., Poku, E., Agbemude, S., & Owusu, F. (2024). Environmental pressure, green logistics strategy and sustainability performance: The moderating role of competitive intensity. Benchmarking: An International Journal. https://doi.org/10.1108/bij-12-2023-0893 . (ahead-of-print)
Eltayeb, T. K., Zailani, S., & Ramayah, T. (2011). Green supply chain initiatives among certified companies in Malaysia and environmental sustainability: Investigating the outcomes. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 55(5), 495–506. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2010.09.003
Eneş, E. (2022). İşletmelerin sürdürülebilirlik stratejileri ile sürdürülebilir tedarik zinciri ve lojistik performansı arasındaki ilişkinin incelenmesine yönelik bir alan araştırması (Yayın No. 735431) [Yüksek lisans tezi, Maltepe Üniversitesi]. YÖK Ulusal Tez Merkezi.
Erenel Yaşlıca, B. (2023). Çevresel sürdürülebilirlik, lojistik performans ve kurumsal yönetişim arasındaki ilişki ve küresel rekabet gücüne etkileri (Yayın No. 803410) [Doktora tezi, Maltepe Üniversitesi]. YÖK Ulusal Tez Merkezi.
Field, Andy P - Gillett, Raphael, How to Do A Meta-Analysis, British Journal of Mathematical & Statistical Psychology 63(3), (2010), 665-694. https://doi.org/10.1348/000711010X502733
Golicic, S. L., & Smith, C. D. (2013). A meta-analysis of environmentally sustainable supply chain management practices and firm performance. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 49(2), 78–95. https://doi.org/10.1111/jscm.12006
Govindan, K., Azevedo, S. G., Carvalho, H., & Cruz-Machado, V. (2014). Impact of supply chain management practices on sustainability. Journal of Cleaner Production, 85, 212–225. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.05.068
Green, K. W., Zelbst, P. J., Meacham, J., & Bhadauria, V. S. (2012). Green supply chain management practices: Impact on performance. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 17(3), 290–305. https://doi.org/10.1108/13598541211227126
Hausman, W. H., Lee, H. L., & Subramanian, U. (2013). The impact of logistics performance on trade. Production and Operations Management, 22(2), 236–252.
Hunter, J. E., & Schmidt, F. L. (2004). Methods of meta-analysis: Correcting error and bias in research findings (2nd ed.). SAGE Publications.
Loucanova, E., Kaputa, V., Nosalova, M., & Olsiakova, M. (2024). The logistics and sustainability in the European Union. Acta Logistica, 11(2), 317-323. https://doi.org/10.22306/al.v11i2.515
Lozano, R. (2008). Envisioning sustainability three-dimensionally. Journal of Cleaner Production, 16(17), 1838–1846.
Martí, L., Martín, J. C., & Puertas, R. (2017). A DEA-logistics performance index. Journal of Applied Economics, Universidad del CEMA, vol. 20, pages 169-192.
McKinnon, A. (2015). Green logistics: Improving the environmental sustainability of logistics. Chartered Institute of Logistics and Transport in the UK, London, Kogan Page.
Mentzer, J. T., & Konrad, B. P. (1991). An efficiency/effectiveness approach to logistics performance analysis. Journal of Business Logistics, 12(1), 33–62.
Qazi, A., Simsekler, M. C. E., & Al-Mhdawi, M. K. S. (2025). Bayesian network perspectives on sustainable pathways: Exploring logistics’ influence on multi-dimensional sustainability. Environment, Development and Sustainability. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-025-06224-1 (ahead-of-print)
Pagell, M., & Wu, Z. (2009). Building a more complete theory of sustainable supply chain management using case studies of 10 exemplars. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 45(2), 37–56. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-493X.2009.03162.x
Porter, M. E., & van der Linde, C. (1995). Toward a new conception of the environment–competitiveness relationship. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 9(4), 97–118. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.9.4.97
Rao, P., & Holt, D. (2005). Do green supply chains lead to competitiveness and economic performance? International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 25(9), 898–916. https://doi.org/10.1108/01443570510613956
Sarkis, J., Zhu, Q., & Lai, K. H. (2010). An organizational theoretic review of green supply chain management literature. International Journal of Production Economics, 130(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2010.11.010
Sarkis, J., Zhu, Q., & Lai, K. H. (2011). An organizational theoretic review of green supply chain management literature. International Journal of Production Economics, 130(1), 1–15.
Sarkis, J. (2012). A boundaries and flows perspective of green supply chain management. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 17(2), 202–216. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/13598541211212924
Sbihi, A., & Eglese, R. W. (2007). Combinatorial optimization and green logistics. Annals of Operations Research, 175, 159-175. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-009-0651-z
Seuring, S., & Müller, M. (2008). From a literature review to a conceptual framework for sustainable supply chain management. Journal of Cleaner Production, 16(15), 1699–1710. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2008.04.020
Srivastava, S. K. (2007). Green supply‐chain management: A state‐of‐the‐art literature review. International Journal of Management Reviews, 9(1), 53–80. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2370.2007.00202.x
Testa, F., & Iraldo, F. (2010). Shadows and lights of GSCM (Green Supply Chain Management): Determinants and effects of these practices based on a multi-national study. Journal of Cleaner Production, 18(10–11), 953–962. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2010.03.005
Tzeng, G. H., Lin, C. W., & Opricovic, S. (2007). Multi-criteria analysis of alternative-fuel buses for public transportation. Energy Policy, 35(2), 796–803. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2003.12.014
Uygun O., Kacamak H. &Kahraman Ü.A. (2015), An integrated DEMATEL and Fuzzy ANP techniques for evaluation and selection of outsourcing provider for a telecommunication company. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 86, 137–146. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2014.09.014
Viechtbauer, W. (2005). Bias and efficiency of meta-analytic variance estimators in the random-effects model. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 30(3), 261–293. https://doi.org/10.3102/10769986030003261
Winkelhaus, S., & Grosse, E. H. (2020). Logistics 4.0: a systematic review towards a new logistics system. International Journal of Production Research, 58(1), 18–43.
World Commission on Environment and Development (WCED). (1987). Our Common Future. Oxford University Press.
Zhu, Q., & Sarkis, J. (2004). Relationships between operational practices and performance among early adopters of green supply chain management practices in Chinese manufacturing enterprises. Journal of Operations Management, 22(3), 265–289. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jom.2004.01.005

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil

İngilizce

Konular

İşletme

Bölüm

Araştırma Makalesi

Yazarlar

Ahmet İlbaş ^*
0000-0002-1786-613X
Türkiye

Yayımlanma Tarihi

26 Ocak 2026

Gönderilme Tarihi

27 Ekim 2025

Kabul Tarihi

26 Aralık 2025

Yayımlandığı Sayı

Yıl 2026 Cilt: 27 Sayı: 1

DOI

https://doi.org/10.37880/cumuiibf.1811553

IZ

https://izlik.org/JA39MP76XW

Kaynak Göster

RIS / Bibtex

APA

İlbaş, A. (2026). THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN SUSTAINABILITY PRACTICES AND LOGISTICS PERFORMANCE: A META-ANALYSIS STUDY. Cumhuriyet Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi, 27(1), 133-145. https://doi.org/10.37880/cumuiibf.1811553