DO SERVICE SECTORS BENEFIT MANUFACTURING GLOBAL VALUE CHAIN PARTICIPATION?

Pınar Tat

doi:10.37880/cumuiibf.1940396

TR EN

HİZMET SEKTÖRLERİ İMALAT SEKTÖRÜNÜN KÜRESEL DEĞER ZİNCİRİNE KATILIMINA FAYDA SAĞLAR MI?

Öz

Bilgi ve iletişim teknolojileri, lojistik ve finans gibi hizmetler, ülkeler arasında dağınık üretim aşamalarının koordinasyonunda kritik ve giderek artan bir rol oynamaktadır. Hizmet sektörleri, ülkelerin küresel değer zincirlerine daha kolay entegre olmalarını ve uluslararası üretim ağları içinde daha etkin bir şekilde faaliyet göstermelerini sağlayarak, verimlilik artışlarını, ekonomik büyümeyi ve küresel değer zincirlerine daha fazla katılımı desteklemektedir. Bu nedenle, hizmet sektörlerinin ülkelerin küresel değer zincirlerine katılımını şekillendirmede kilit bir rol oynaması beklenmektedir. Bu çalışma, hizmet sektörlerinin payının imalat sektörünün küresel değer zincirlerine (KDZ) katılımı üzerindeki etkilerini incelemektedir. Çalışma ayrıca bu etkinin heterojenliğini araştırmakta ve 1990-2023 dönemi için 35 gelişmiş ve 138 gelişmekte olan ülkeyi ayrı ayrı analiz etmektedir. Sonuçlar, hizmet sektörlerinin payının her türlü imalat ileri KDZ katılımını ve imalat karmaşık geri KDZ katılımını artırdığını, imalat basit geri KDZ katılımını ise azalttığını göstermektedir. Diğer bir deyişle, hizmet sektörleri, ileri bağlantılardaki imalat faaliyetlerinin bir tamamlayıcısı ve küresel üretim ve ticaret ağlarındaki ithal ara malların bir ikamesi olarak görülebilir. Bu durum, dijital altyapı, lojistik ve finans gibi hizmetlerin imalat KDZ’lerine girişi desteklemedeki kilit rolünü yansıtmaktadır. Bu etki, esas olarak gelişmekte olan ülkeler tarafından yönlendirilmektedir. Bu nedenle, hizmetler, doğrudan ekonomik faydalarının yanı sıra, gelişmekte olan ülkelerin imalat KDZ’lerine daha fazla ve daha derin katılımına katkıda bulunmaktadır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

DO SERVICE SECTORS BENEFIT MANUFACTURING GLOBAL VALUE CHAIN PARTICIPATION?

Öz

Services such as information and communication technologies, logistics, and finance play a critical and increasing role in the coordination of fragmented production stages across countries. Service sectors enable countries to integrate more easily into global value chains and operate more effectively within international production networks, thereby supporting productivity gains, economic growth, and higher GVC participation. Therefore, service sectors are expected to play a key role in shaping countries’ involvement in GVCs. This study explores the effects of the share of service sectors on manufacturing GVC participation. The study also explores heterogeneity in this effect and analyzes 35 developed and 138 developing countries separately over the years 1990-2023. The results suggest that the share of service sectors increases all types of manufacturing forward GVC participation and manufacturing complex backward GVC participation and decreases manufacturing simple backward GVC participation. In other words, service sectors can be seen as a complement to manufacturing activities in the forward linkages and a substitute for imported intermediates in global production and trade networks. This reflects the key role of services such as digital infrastructure, logistics, and finance in supporting entry into manufacturing GVCs. The effect is driven mainly by developing countries. Therefore, in addition to their direct economic benefits, services contribute to more and deeper participation in manufacturing GVCs in developing countries.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Kaynakça

Antrás, P., & Chor, D. (2022). Global value chains. Handbook of International Economics, 5, 297-376.
Arnold, J. M., Javorcik, B. S., & Mattoo, A. (2011). Does services liberalization benefit manufacturing firms?: Evidence from the Czech Republic. Journal of International Economics, 85(1), 136-146.
Baldwin, R. (2013). Global supply chains: why they emerged, why they matter, and where they are going. In Global Value Chains in a Changing World (pp. 13-59). WTO iLibrary.
Chen, G., Liu, Y., Gao, Q., & Zhang, J. (2023). Does regional services development enhance manufacturing firm productivity? A manufacturing servitization perspective. International Review of Economics & Finance, 86, 451-466.
Crozet, M., & Milet, E. (2017). Should everybody be in services? The effect of servitization on manufacturing firm performance. Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, 26(4), 820-841.
Cui, Y., & Liu, B. (2018). Manufacturing servitisation and duration of exports in China. The World Economy, 41(6), 1695–1721.
Dai, Y., Zhao, X., Yang, J., & Chen, H. (2024). How does manufacturing servitization effect global value chain upgrading? Tests based on the dual perspectives of “participation” and “division position”. Economic Analysis and Policy, 81, 709-723.
Du, Y., & Agbola, F. W. (2024). Servicification and global value chain upgrading: empirical evidence from China’s manufacturing industry. Journal of the Asia Pacific Economy, 29(2), 739-761.

Duggan, V., Rahardja, S., & Varela, G. (2013). Service sector reform and manufacturing productivity: Evidence from Indonesia. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper 6349.
Gereffi, G. (1994). The organization of buyer-driven commodity chains: How US retailers shape overseas production networks. In Commodity chains and global capitalism, ed. M. Korzeniewicz and G. Geref, 95-122. New York: Praeger.
Heuser, C., & Mattoo, A. (2017). Services trade and global value chains. In D. Dollar & Z. Wang (Eds.), Measuring and analyzing the impact of GVCs on economic development. Chapter 6. World Bank.
Hoekman, B., & Shepherd, B. (2017). Services productivity, trade policy and manufacturing exports. The World Economy, 40(3), 499–516.
Humphrey, J., & H. Schmitz. (2000). Governance and upgrading: Linking industrial cluster and global value chain research (IDS Working Paper No. 120). Institute of Development Studies.
Lanz, R., & A. Maurer. (2015). Services and global value chains: Some evidence on servicification of manufacturing and services networks (WTO Working Paper No. ERSD-2015-03). World Trade Organization, Economic Research and Statistics Division. https://www.wto.org/english//res_e/reser_e/ersd201503_e.pdf
Lenzen, M., Kanemoto, K., Moran, D., & Geschke, A. (2012). Mapping the structure of the world economy. Environmental Science & Technology, 46(15), 8374-8381.
Lenzen, M., Moran, D., Kanemoto, K., & Geschke, A. (2013). Building Eora: a global multi-region input–output database at high country and sector resolution. Economic Systems Research, 25(1), 20-49.
Lodefalk, M. (2014). The role of services for manufacturing firm exports. Review of World Economics, 150(1), 59–82.
Matsuura, T. (2025). Revisiting the Role of Service for Manufacturing Firm Exports: Evidence from Japanese Firm-level Data. Japan and the World Economy, 101343.
Miroudot, S. (2017). The servicification of global value chains: Evidence and policy implications. In UNCTAD Multi-Year Expert Meeting On Trade, Services and Development. Geneva: UNCTAD.
Miroudot, S., & Cadestin, C. (2017). Services in global value chains. OECD Trade Policy Papers, No. 197.
Nordås, H. K. (2010). Trade in goods and services: Two sides of the same coin?. Economic Modelling, 27(2), 496-506.
Pattnayak, S. S., & Chadha, A. (2022). Servicification and manufacturing exports: Evidence from India. Economic Modelling, 108, 105756.
Porter, M. (1985). The Competitive Advantage: Creating and Sustaining Superior Performance. NY: Free Press.
Reddy, K., Sasidharan, S., & Thangavelu, S. (2023). Does servicification of manufacturing increase the GVC activities of firms? Case of India. The World Economy, 46(1), 153-181.
Ridhwan, M. M., Hidayat, A. A., & Badrawani, W. (2025). How does servicification impact productivity and the global value chain? Evidence from Indonesia. Journal of the Asia Pacific Economy, 1-25.
Stemberger, J., & Kejžar, K. Z. (2025). Servicification of Manufacturing in Global Value Chains: How Services Trade and Foreign Direct Investment Shape Export Quality and Volume. Economic and Business Review, 27(3), 160-174.
University of International Business and Economics (UIBE) GVC Index Team. (2017). “Data Files Structure of the UIBE GVC Index System”, http://139.129.209.66:8000/d/daedafb854/.
University of International Business and Economics (UIBE). (2017a). “Data Files Structure of the UIBE GVC Index System”, https://v2.fangcloud.com/share/a26979974d538c7e5aeb24b55a?folder_id=63000172546&lang=en.
University of International Business and Economics (UIBE). (2017b). “UIBE Global Value Chain Indexes System – Concept Note”, https://v2.fangcloud.com/share/a26979974d538c7e5aeb24b55a?folder_id=63000172546&lang=en.
Vendrell-Herrero, F., Bustinza, O. F., Parry, G., & Georgantzis, N. (2017). Servitization, digitization and supply chain interdependency. Industrial Marketing Management, 60, 69-81.
Wang, Z., Wei, S. J., Yu, X., & Zhu, K. (2017). Characterizing global value chains: production length and upstreamness (No. w23261). National Bureau of Economic Research.
Wolfmayr, Y. (2008). Producer services and competitiveness of manufacturing exports (No. 009). FIW-Research Reports.
World Bank. (n.d.). World Bank country and lending groups. Retrieved September 15, 2026, from https://datahelpdesk.worldbank.org/knowledgebase/articles/906519-world-bank-country-and-lending-groups
Yanikkaya, H., Altun, A., & Tat, P. (2022). Does the complexity of GVC participation matter for productivity and output growth?. The European Journal of Development Research, 34(4), 2038-2068.
Yanikkaya, H., Tat, P., & Altun, A. (2024). Do lower tariff rates promote global value chain participation?. World Trade Review, 23(1), 1-19.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil

İngilizce

Konular

Ekonomi Teorisi (Diğer)

Bölüm

Araştırma Makalesi

Yazarlar

Pınar Tat ^*
0000-0002-7909-7575
Türkiye

Yayımlanma Tarihi

30 Ekim 2026

Gönderilme Tarihi

29 Nisan 2026

Kabul Tarihi

29 Temmuz 2026

Yayımlandığı Sayı

Yıl 2026 Cilt: 27 Sayı: 4

DOI

https://doi.org/10.37880/cumuiibf.1940396

IZ

https://izlik.org/JA63ND23FB

Kaynak Göster

RIS / Bibtex

APA

Tat, P. (2026). DO SERVICE SECTORS BENEFIT MANUFACTURING GLOBAL VALUE CHAIN PARTICIPATION? Cumhuriyet Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi, 27(4), 1253-1267. https://doi.org/10.37880/cumuiibf.1940396

AMA

1.Tat P. DO SERVICE SECTORS BENEFIT MANUFACTURING GLOBAL VALUE CHAIN PARTICIPATION? Cumhuriyet Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi. 2026;27(4):1253-1267. doi:10.37880/cumuiibf.1940396

Chicago

Tat, Pınar. 2026. “DO SERVICE SECTORS BENEFIT MANUFACTURING GLOBAL VALUE CHAIN PARTICIPATION?”. Cumhuriyet Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi 27 (4): 1253-67. https://doi.org/10.37880/cumuiibf.1940396.

EndNote

Tat P (01 Ekim 2026) DO SERVICE SECTORS BENEFIT MANUFACTURING GLOBAL VALUE CHAIN PARTICIPATION? Cumhuriyet Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi 27 4 1253–1267.

IEEE

[1]P. Tat, “DO SERVICE SECTORS BENEFIT MANUFACTURING GLOBAL VALUE CHAIN PARTICIPATION?”, Cumhuriyet Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi, c. 27, sy 4, ss. 1253–1267, Eki. 2026, doi: 10.37880/cumuiibf.1940396.

ISNAD

Tat, Pınar. “DO SERVICE SECTORS BENEFIT MANUFACTURING GLOBAL VALUE CHAIN PARTICIPATION?”. Cumhuriyet Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi 27/4 (01 Ekim 2026): 1253-1267. https://doi.org/10.37880/cumuiibf.1940396.

JAMA

1.Tat P. DO SERVICE SECTORS BENEFIT MANUFACTURING GLOBAL VALUE CHAIN PARTICIPATION? Cumhuriyet Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi. 2026;27:1253–1267.

MLA

Tat, Pınar. “DO SERVICE SECTORS BENEFIT MANUFACTURING GLOBAL VALUE CHAIN PARTICIPATION?”. Cumhuriyet Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi, c. 27, sy 4, Ekim 2026, ss. 1253-67, doi:10.37880/cumuiibf.1940396.

Vancouver

1.Pınar Tat. DO SERVICE SECTORS BENEFIT MANUFACTURING GLOBAL VALUE CHAIN PARTICIPATION? Cumhuriyet Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi. 01 Ekim 2026;27(4):1253-67. doi:10.37880/cumuiibf.1940396