BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster

ÖĞRENME EĞİLİMİ-İŞLETME PERFORMANSI İLİŞKİSİ: İNOVASYON STRATEJİSİ VE FORMEL YAPININ ROLÜ

Yıl 2016, Cilt: 17 Sayı: 1, 227 - 242, 20.05.2016

Özlem Yaşar Uğurlu , Mehmet Tekinkuş Sibel Ayas

Öz

Bu araştırma, öğrenme eğilimi ve işletme performansı arasındaki ilişkide, inovasyon stratejisinin aracı etkisini, formel yapının da, inovasyon stratejisi ve işletme performansı arasındaki ilişkide ılımlaştırıcı etkisini ölçmeyi amaçlamaktadır. Araştırmada veri toplama aracı olarak anket kullanılmaktadır. Araştırmanın örneklemini Gaziantep’te faaliyet gösteren ve Gaziantep Sanayi Odası’ndan 2012 yılı verilerine göre AR-GE ve inovasyon dalında ödül alan30işletmenin üst, orta ve alt kademe yöneticileri oluşturmaktadır. Araştırma anketinden elde edilen sonuçlar, inovasyon stratejisinin öğrenme eğiliminin tüm boyutları ile işletme performansı arasındaki ilişkide anlamlı bir aracılık etkisine sahip olduğunu göstermektedir. Bununla birlikte araştırma sonuçlarına göre, formel yapının, inovasyon stratejisi ve işletme performansı arasındaki ilişkisi üzerine ılımlaştırıcı bir etkisi olmadığı saptanmıştır. 

Kaynakça

  • Alegre, J. & Chiva, R. (2008). Assessing the Impact of Organizational Learning Capability on Product Innovation Performance: An Empirical Test. Technovation, 28, 315–326.
  • Altunışık, R., Coşkun, R., Bayraktaroğlu, S. & Yıldırım, E.. (2005). Sosyal Bilimlerde Araştırma Yöntemleri. Sakarya: Sakarya Kitabevi.
  • Argyris, C. & Schön D. A.. (1996). Organizational Learning II; Theory, Method and Practice. U.S.A.:Addison-Wesley Publishing Company.
  • Baron, R. M. & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The Moderator-Mediator Variable Distinction in Social Psychological Research: Conceptual, Strategic, and Statistical Considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173–1182.
  • Bryman, A. & Bell, E. (2007). Business Research Methods (2. Baskı.). New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Calantone, R.J. Çavuşgil, T. S., & Zhao, Y. (2002). Learning Orientation, Firm Innovation Capability, and Firm Performance. Industrial Marketing Management, 31, 515–524.
  • Crossan, M.M. & Berdrow, I. (2003). Organizational Learning and Strategic Renewal. Strategic Management Journal, 24 (11), 1087–1105.
  • Damanpour, F. (1991). Organizational Innovation: A Meta-Analysis of Effects of Determinants and Moderators. Academy of Management Journal, 34 (3), 555–590.
  • DiBella, A., Nevis, E. C. & Gould, J. M. (1996). Organizational Learning Style as a Core Capability. B. Moingeon ve A. Edmondson (Ed.). Organizational Learning and Competitive Advantage (s.38–55). London: Sage Publications.
  • Dodgson, M., Gann, D. & Salter, A. (2008). The Management of Technological Innovation: Strategy and Practice (2. Baskı), New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Donaldson, L. (2001). The Contingency Theory of Organizations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
  • Freeman, C. (1982). The Economics of Industrial Innovation. London: Frances Pinter.
  • Garvin, D. A. (1993). Building a Learning Organization. Harvard Business Review, 71(4), 78–91.
  • Gilbert, J.T. (1994). Choosing an Innovation Strategy: Theory and Practice. Business Horizons, 337(6), 16–21.
  • Goh, S. & Richards, G. (1997). Benchmarking the Learning Capacity of Organizations. European Management Journal, 15, 575–583.
  • Hsu, Y. H., & Fang, W. (2009). Intellectual Capital and New Product Development Performance: The Mediating Role of Organizational Learning Capability. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 76(5), 664-677.
  • Huang, S.K. & Wang, Y. (2011). Entrepreneurial Orientation, Learning Orientation, and Innovation in Small and Medium Enterprises. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 24, 563-570.
  • Huber, G.P. (1991). Organizational Learning: The Contributing Process and The Literature. Organization Science, 2 (1), 88–115.
  • Jerez-Gomez, P., Cespedes-Lorente J. & Vale-Cabrera R. (2005). Organizational Learning and Compensation Strategies: Evidence from The Spanish Chemical Industry. Human Resource Management, 44 (3), 279–299.
  • Johnson, J.D.,Meyer, M.E., Berkowitz, J.M., Ethington C.T. & Miller, V.D.(1997). Testing Two Contrasting Structural Models of Innovativeness in a Contractual Network. Human Communication Research, 24 (2), 320–48.
  • Katz, B. R.,Preez, N. D. & Schutte, C. S. L. (2010). Definition and Role of an Innovation Strategy. Erişim Tarihi 2 Şubat 2013, http://www.saiie.co.za/ocs/index.php/saiie/SAIIE10/paper/view/119/72.
  • Li, H. & Atuahene-Gima, K. (2001). Product Innovation Strategy and the Performance of New Technology Ventures in China. Academy of Management Journal, 44(6), 1123-1134.
  • McGill, M. E., & Slocum, J. W. (1993). Unlearning the Organization. Organizational Dynamics, 22(2), 67-79.
  • Menguc, B., & Auh, S. (2010). Development and Return on Execution of Product Innovation Capabilities: The Role of Organizational Structure. Industrial Marketing Management, 39(5), 820-831.
  • Nayır, Z.D. & Tamm, U. (2010). Örgütlerde Formelizasyon Yenilik Yapabilme Yeteneğine Engel Oluşturur mu? Bankalarda Yenilik Boyutları. 18. Ulusal Yönetim ve Organizayon Kongresi, 20–22 Mayıs, Adana, 372–378.
  • Oke, A.,Walumbwa, F. O. & Myers, A. (2012). Innovation Strategy, Human Resource Policy, and Firms' Revenue Growth: The Roles of Environmental Uncertainty and Innovation Performance. Decision Sciences, 43(2) 273–302.
  • Oskarsson, G. (2003). The Ancedents and Process of Innovation. The IV Conference in Social Sciences, University of Iceland, Şubat 21–22, 1–14.
  • Singh, K. (2006). Assessing Organizational Learning in Indian Business Organizations: An Integrated Approach to Learning Organizations. Second International Conference on Business, Management and Economics, 15–18 Haziran, İzmir, 33–48.
  • Sobel, M. E. (1982). Asymptotic Intervals for Indirect Effects in Structural Equations Models. S. Leinhart (Ed.), Sociological Methodology (s. 290–312). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
  • Spacapan, G.L. & Bastic, M. (2007). Differences in Organizations’ Innovation Capability in Transition Economy: Internal aspect of the Organizations’ Strategic Orientation. Technovation, 27, 533–546.
  • Strecker, N. (2009). Innovation Strategy and Firm Performance: An Empirical Study of Publicly Listed Firms. Wiesbaden: Gabler Verlag.
  • Terziovski, M. (2010). Innovation Practice and its Performance Implications in Small and Medium Enterprises (SMEs) in the Manufacturing Sector: A Resource-Based View. Strategic Management Journal, 31(8), 1892–902.
  • Ulrich, D. Jick, T. & Von Glinow, M. A. (1993). High-Impact Learning: Building and Diffusing Learning Capability. Organizational Dynamics, 22, 52–66.
  • Ussahawanitchakit, P. (2008). Organizational Learning Capability, Organizational Commitment, and Organizational Effectiveness: An Empirical Study of Thai Accounting Firms. International Journal of Business Strategy, 8 (3), 1–12.
  • Zahra, S.A. & George, G. (2002). Absorptive Capacity: A Review, Reconceptualization, and Extension. Academy of Management Review, 17 (2), 185–203.
  • Zheng, W., Yang, B., & McLean, G. N. (2010). Linking Organizational Culture, Structure, Strategy, and Organizational Effectiveness: Mediating Role of Knowledge Management. Journal of Business Research, 63(7), 763-771.

Yıl 2016, Cilt: 17 Sayı: 1, 227 - 242, 20.05.2016

Özlem Yaşar Uğurlu , Mehmet Tekinkuş Sibel Ayas

Öz

Kaynakça

  • Alegre, J. & Chiva, R. (2008). Assessing the Impact of Organizational Learning Capability on Product Innovation Performance: An Empirical Test. Technovation, 28, 315–326.
  • Altunışık, R., Coşkun, R., Bayraktaroğlu, S. & Yıldırım, E.. (2005). Sosyal Bilimlerde Araştırma Yöntemleri. Sakarya: Sakarya Kitabevi.
  • Argyris, C. & Schön D. A.. (1996). Organizational Learning II; Theory, Method and Practice. U.S.A.:Addison-Wesley Publishing Company.
  • Baron, R. M. & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The Moderator-Mediator Variable Distinction in Social Psychological Research: Conceptual, Strategic, and Statistical Considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173–1182.
  • Bryman, A. & Bell, E. (2007). Business Research Methods (2. Baskı.). New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Calantone, R.J. Çavuşgil, T. S., & Zhao, Y. (2002). Learning Orientation, Firm Innovation Capability, and Firm Performance. Industrial Marketing Management, 31, 515–524.
  • Crossan, M.M. & Berdrow, I. (2003). Organizational Learning and Strategic Renewal. Strategic Management Journal, 24 (11), 1087–1105.
  • Damanpour, F. (1991). Organizational Innovation: A Meta-Analysis of Effects of Determinants and Moderators. Academy of Management Journal, 34 (3), 555–590.
  • DiBella, A., Nevis, E. C. & Gould, J. M. (1996). Organizational Learning Style as a Core Capability. B. Moingeon ve A. Edmondson (Ed.). Organizational Learning and Competitive Advantage (s.38–55). London: Sage Publications.
  • Dodgson, M., Gann, D. & Salter, A. (2008). The Management of Technological Innovation: Strategy and Practice (2. Baskı), New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Donaldson, L. (2001). The Contingency Theory of Organizations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
  • Freeman, C. (1982). The Economics of Industrial Innovation. London: Frances Pinter.
  • Garvin, D. A. (1993). Building a Learning Organization. Harvard Business Review, 71(4), 78–91.
  • Gilbert, J.T. (1994). Choosing an Innovation Strategy: Theory and Practice. Business Horizons, 337(6), 16–21.
  • Goh, S. & Richards, G. (1997). Benchmarking the Learning Capacity of Organizations. European Management Journal, 15, 575–583.
  • Hsu, Y. H., & Fang, W. (2009). Intellectual Capital and New Product Development Performance: The Mediating Role of Organizational Learning Capability. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 76(5), 664-677.
  • Huang, S.K. & Wang, Y. (2011). Entrepreneurial Orientation, Learning Orientation, and Innovation in Small and Medium Enterprises. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 24, 563-570.
  • Huber, G.P. (1991). Organizational Learning: The Contributing Process and The Literature. Organization Science, 2 (1), 88–115.
  • Jerez-Gomez, P., Cespedes-Lorente J. & Vale-Cabrera R. (2005). Organizational Learning and Compensation Strategies: Evidence from The Spanish Chemical Industry. Human Resource Management, 44 (3), 279–299.
  • Johnson, J.D.,Meyer, M.E., Berkowitz, J.M., Ethington C.T. & Miller, V.D.(1997). Testing Two Contrasting Structural Models of Innovativeness in a Contractual Network. Human Communication Research, 24 (2), 320–48.
  • Katz, B. R.,Preez, N. D. & Schutte, C. S. L. (2010). Definition and Role of an Innovation Strategy. Erişim Tarihi 2 Şubat 2013, http://www.saiie.co.za/ocs/index.php/saiie/SAIIE10/paper/view/119/72.
  • Li, H. & Atuahene-Gima, K. (2001). Product Innovation Strategy and the Performance of New Technology Ventures in China. Academy of Management Journal, 44(6), 1123-1134.
  • McGill, M. E., & Slocum, J. W. (1993). Unlearning the Organization. Organizational Dynamics, 22(2), 67-79.
  • Menguc, B., & Auh, S. (2010). Development and Return on Execution of Product Innovation Capabilities: The Role of Organizational Structure. Industrial Marketing Management, 39(5), 820-831.
  • Nayır, Z.D. & Tamm, U. (2010). Örgütlerde Formelizasyon Yenilik Yapabilme Yeteneğine Engel Oluşturur mu? Bankalarda Yenilik Boyutları. 18. Ulusal Yönetim ve Organizayon Kongresi, 20–22 Mayıs, Adana, 372–378.
  • Oke, A.,Walumbwa, F. O. & Myers, A. (2012). Innovation Strategy, Human Resource Policy, and Firms' Revenue Growth: The Roles of Environmental Uncertainty and Innovation Performance. Decision Sciences, 43(2) 273–302.
  • Oskarsson, G. (2003). The Ancedents and Process of Innovation. The IV Conference in Social Sciences, University of Iceland, Şubat 21–22, 1–14.
  • Singh, K. (2006). Assessing Organizational Learning in Indian Business Organizations: An Integrated Approach to Learning Organizations. Second International Conference on Business, Management and Economics, 15–18 Haziran, İzmir, 33–48.
  • Sobel, M. E. (1982). Asymptotic Intervals for Indirect Effects in Structural Equations Models. S. Leinhart (Ed.), Sociological Methodology (s. 290–312). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
  • Spacapan, G.L. & Bastic, M. (2007). Differences in Organizations’ Innovation Capability in Transition Economy: Internal aspect of the Organizations’ Strategic Orientation. Technovation, 27, 533–546.
  • Strecker, N. (2009). Innovation Strategy and Firm Performance: An Empirical Study of Publicly Listed Firms. Wiesbaden: Gabler Verlag.
  • Terziovski, M. (2010). Innovation Practice and its Performance Implications in Small and Medium Enterprises (SMEs) in the Manufacturing Sector: A Resource-Based View. Strategic Management Journal, 31(8), 1892–902.
  • Ulrich, D. Jick, T. & Von Glinow, M. A. (1993). High-Impact Learning: Building and Diffusing Learning Capability. Organizational Dynamics, 22, 52–66.
  • Ussahawanitchakit, P. (2008). Organizational Learning Capability, Organizational Commitment, and Organizational Effectiveness: An Empirical Study of Thai Accounting Firms. International Journal of Business Strategy, 8 (3), 1–12.
  • Zahra, S.A. & George, G. (2002). Absorptive Capacity: A Review, Reconceptualization, and Extension. Academy of Management Review, 17 (2), 185–203.
  • Zheng, W., Yang, B., & McLean, G. N. (2010). Linking Organizational Culture, Structure, Strategy, and Organizational Effectiveness: Mediating Role of Knowledge Management. Journal of Business Research, 63(7), 763-771.
Toplam 36 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Bölüm Makaleler
Yazarlar

Özlem Yaşar Uğurlu

Mehmet Tekinkuş

Sibel Ayas

Yayımlanma Tarihi 20 Mayıs 2016
Gönderilme Tarihi 8 Nisan 2015
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2016Cilt: 17 Sayı: 1

Kaynak Göster

APA Yaşar Uğurlu, Ö., Tekinkuş, M., & Ayas, S. (2016). ÖĞRENME EĞİLİMİ-İŞLETME PERFORMANSI İLİŞKİSİ: İNOVASYON STRATEJİSİ VE FORMEL YAPININ ROLÜ. Cumhuriyet Üniversitesi İktisadi Ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi, 17(1), 227-242.
 Kapak Resmi İndir

Cumhuriyet Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi Creative Commons Atıf-GayriTicari 4.0 Uluslararası Lisansı (CC BY NC) ile lisanslanmıştır.