Redirecting to http://dergipark.org.tr/_fragment?_hash=S4NwgnCIqG7W7y4Gzo7bf0_JgzSWiFFP6gAGco1RiR8&_path=id%3D1332363%26_format%3Dhtml%26_locale%3Dtr%26_controller%3DApp%255CController%255CSite%255CArticleController%253A%253AesiArticleStats.
Araştırma Makalesi
BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster

The Effect of Globalization on Ecological Footprint: The Case of MIKTA Countries

Yıl 2024, Cilt: 25 Sayı: 1, 14 - 26, 31.01.2024

Meltem Ince Yenilmez , Merve Erkut , Eylül Kabakçı Günay

https://doi.org/10.37880/cumuiibf.1332363
Cited By: 3

Öz

It is a well-known fact that globalization has a direct impact on economic growth through trade and foreign direct investment. However, there is no consensus in the literature on the impact of globalization on the environment. In this context, the relationship between globalization and ecological footprint, which is an indicator of environmental pollution, was examined for the MIKTA country group consisting of Mexico, Indonesia, South Korea, Turkey and Australia between the 1970-2018 period. According to the results of the Panel ARDL analysis, it was determined that there is a negative relationship between globalization and ecological footprint of the MIKTA country group in the long term, and a positive relationship between economic growth and energy consumption and ecological footprint.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Globalization Ecological Footprint MIKTA countries.

Kaynakça

  • Abid, A., Majeed, M. T., & Luni, T. (2021). Analyzing ecological footprint through the lens of globalization, financial development, natural resources, human capital and urbanization. Pakistan Journal of Commerce and Social Sciences (PJCSS), 15(4), 765-795.
  • Ahmed, Z., Wang, Z., Mahmood, F., Hafeez, M., & Ali, N. (2019). Does globalization increase the ecological footprint? Empirical evidence from Malaysia. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 26(18), 18565-18582. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-019-05224-9
  • Alper, A. E., Alper, F. O., Ozayturk, G., & Mike, F. (2022). Testing the long-run impact of economic growth, energy consumption, and globalization on ecological footprint: New evidence from Fourier bootstrap ARDL and Fourier bootstrap Toda–Yamamoto test results. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 1-16.
  • Ansari, M. A., Ahmad, M. R., Siddique, S., & Mansoor, K. (2020). An environment Kuznets curve for ecological footprint: Evidence from GCC countries. Carbon Management, 11(4), 355-368.
  • Apaydın, Ş., Ursavaş, U., & Koç, Ü. (2021). The impact of globalization on the ecological footprint: Do convergence clubs matter? Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 28(38), 1-15.
  • Apaydin, Ş. (2020). Küreselleşmenin ekolojik ayakizi üzerindeki etkileri: Türkiye örneği. Ekonomi Politika ve Finans Araştırmaları Dergisi, 5(1), 23-42.
  • Awosusi, A. A., Adebayo, T. S., Kirikkaleli, D., & Altuntaş, M. (2022). Role of technological innovation and globalization in BRICS economies: Policy towards environmental sustainability. International Journal of Sustainable Development & World Ecology, 29(7), 593-610.
  • Bilgili, F., Ulucak, R., Koçak, E., & İlkay, S. Ç. (2020). Does globalization matter for environmental sustainability? Empirical investigation for Turkey by Markov regime switching models. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 27, 1087-1100.
  • Bucak, Ç. (2022). G8 ülkelerinde ve Türkiye’de ekonomik karmaşıklık ve ekolojik ayak izi ilişkisi: Toda-Yamamoto nedensellik testi analizi. Sosyal Ekonomik Araştırmalar Dergisi, 22(1), 1-16.
  • Çeliköz, Y. S., Yıldız, T., Arslan, Ü., & Kırmızıoğlu, H. (2022). The relationship between economic globalization and ecological footprint: Empirical evidence for developed and developing countries. Agricultural and Resource Economics: International Scientific E-Journal, 8(4), 109-133.
  • Figge, L., Oebels, K., & Offermans, A. (2017). The effects of globalization on Ecological Footprints: An empirical analysis. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 19, 863-876.
  • Gygli, S., Haelg, F., Potrafke, N., & Sturm, J.-E. (2019). The KOF globalisation index – revisited. The Review of International Organizations, 14(3), 543-574. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11558-019-09344-2
  • Ibrahiem, D. M., & Hanafy, S. A. (2020). Dynamic linkages amongst ecological footprints, fossil fuel energy consumption and globalization: An empirical analysis. Management of Environmental Quality: An International Journal, 31(6), 1549-1568.
  • IEA. (2023). CO2 Emissions in 2022. https://www.iea.org/news/global-co2-emissions-rose-less-than-initially-feared-in-2022-as-clean-energy-growth-offset-much-of-the-impact-of-greater-coal-and-oil-use
  • Karaduman, C. (2022). The effects of economic globalization and productivity on environmental quality: Evidence from newly industrialized countries. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 29(1), 639-652.
  • Kardaslar, A. (2022). Ekonomik Büyüme, Enerji Tüketimi ve Küreselleşme Sürecinin Ekolojik Ayak İzi Üzerindeki Etkisi: Türkiye Örneği. Business and Economics Research Journal, 13(3), 385-401.
  • Kırbaşoğlu, F., & Tüfekçi, Ö. (2019). Avrupa Birliği’nin Yükselen Güçler Politikası: BRICS ve MIKTA Ülkelerinin Meydan Okumaları. Novus Orbis: Siyaset Bilimi ve Uluslararası İlişkiler Dergisi, 2(1), 39-70.
  • Kihombo, S., Vaseer, A. I., Ahmed, Z., Chen, S., Kirikkaleli, D., & Adebayo, T. S. (2022). Is there a tradeoff between financial globalization, economic growth, and environmental sustainability? An advanced panel analysis. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 29, 3983-3993.
  • Kirikkaleli, D., Adebayo, T. S., Khan, Z., & Ali, S. (2021). Does globalization matter for ecological footprint in Turkey? Evidence from dual adjustment approach. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 28(11), 14009-14017.
  • KOF İsviçre Ekonomi Enstitüsü. (2023, Haziran 2). KOF Globalisation Index. https://kof.ethz.ch/en/forecasts-and-indicators/indicators/kof-globalisation-index.html
  • Langnel, Z., & Amegavi, G. B. (2020). Globalization, electricity consumption and ecological footprint: An autoregressive distributive lag (ARDL) approach. Sustainable Cities and Society, 63, 102482.
  • Nathaniel, S. P. (2021). Economic complexity versus ecological footprint in the era of globalization: Evidence from ASEAN countries. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 28, 64871-64881.
  • Official Website of MIKTA. (2023). Vision. http://mikta.org/about/vision/
  • Özbek, S. (2023). Ekonomik Büyüme, Küreselleşme ve Ekolojik Ayak İzi İlişkisi: ASEAN-5 Ülkeleri Üzerine Ekonometrik Bir Analiz. Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi Vizyoner Dergisi, 14(37), 123-138.
  • Pata, U. K. (2021). Renewable and non-renewable energy consumption, economic complexity, CO 2 emissions, and ecological footprint in the USA: testing the EKC hypothesis with a structural break. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 28, 846-861.
  • Pata, U. K., & Caglar, A. E. (2021). Investigating the EKC hypothesis with renewable energy consumption, human capital, globalization and trade openness for China: Evidence from augmented ARDL approach with a structural break. Energy, 216, 119220.
  • Pesaran, M. H. (2006). Estimation and inference in large heterogeneous panels with a multifactor error structure. Econometrica, 74(4), 967-1012.
  • Pesaran, M. H. (2007). A Simple Panel Unit Root Test in the Presence of Cross‐section Dependence. Journal of applied econometrics, 22(2), 265-312.
  • Pesaran, M. H., Ullah, A., & Yamagata, T. (2008). A bias‐adjusted LM test of error cross‐section independence. The Econometrics Journal, 11(1), 105-127. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1368-423X.2007.00227.x
  • Pesaran, M. H., & Yamagata, T. (2008). Testing slope homogeneity in large panels. Journal of econometrics, 142(1), 50-93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeconom.2007.05.010
  • Potrafke, N. (2015). The evidence on globalisation. The World Economy, 38(3), 509-552.
  • Rudolph, A., & Figge, L. (2017). Determinants of ecological footprints: What is the role of globalization? Ecological Indicators, 81, 348-361.
  • Sabir, S., & Gorus, M. S. (2019). The impact of globalization on ecological footprint: Empirical evidence from the South Asian countries. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 26, 33387-33398.
  • Sharif, A., Afshan, S., & Qureshi, M. A. (2019). Idolization and ramification between globalization and ecological footprints: Evidence from quantile-on-quantile approach. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 26, 11191-11211.
  • Swamy, P. A. (1970). Efficient inference in a random coefficient regression model. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, 311-323.
  • Villanthenkodath, M. A., & Pal, S. (2023). How economic globalization affects the ecological footprint in India? A novel dynamic ARDL simulations. Journal of Economic and Administrative Sciences.
  • Westerlund, J. (2007). Testing for error correction in panel data. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and statistics, 69(6), 709-748. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0084.2007.00477.x
  • WWF. (2012). Türkiye’nin ekolojk ayak izi raporu. https://www.wwf.org.tr/?1412/turkiyeninekolojikayakizibilancosu
  • Yilanci, V., & Gorus, M. S. (2020). Does economic globalization have predictive power for ecological footprint in MENA counties? A panel causality test with a Fourier function. Environmental science and pollution research, 27(32), 40552-40562.
  • Zheng, D., & Shi, M. (2017). Multiple environmental policies and pollution haven hypothesis: Evidence from China’s polluting industries. Journal of Cleaner Production, 141, 295-304. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.09.091

Küreselleşme ve Ekolojik Ayak İzi Arasındaki İlişki: MIKTA Ülkeleri Örneği

Yıl 2024, Cilt: 25 Sayı: 1, 14 - 26, 31.01.2024

Meltem Ince Yenilmez , Merve Erkut , Eylül Kabakçı Günay

https://doi.org/10.37880/cumuiibf.1332363
Cited By: 3

Öz

Küreselleşmenin ticaret ve doğrudan yabancı yatırım yoluyla ekonomik büyüme üzerinde doğrudan bir etkisi bilinen bir gerçektir. Ancak küreselleşmenin çevre üzerindeki etkisine dair literatürde fikir birliği oluşmamıştır. Bu kapsamda çalışmada 1970-2018 dönem aralığında Meksika, Endonezya, Güney Kore, Türkiye ve Avustralya ülkelerinden oluşan MIKTA ülke grubu için küreselleşme ile çevre kirliliği göstergesi olan ekolojik ayak izi arasındaki ilişki incelenmiştir. Yapılan Panel ARDL analiz sonuçlarına göre, MIKTA ülke grubunun uzun dönemde küreselleşme ile ekolojik ayak izi arasında negatif, ekonomik büyüme ve enerji tüketimi ile ekolojik ayak izi arasında pozitif bir ilişki olduğu belirlenmiştir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Küreselleşme Ekolojik Ayak İzi MIKTA ülkeleri

Kaynakça

  • Abid, A., Majeed, M. T., & Luni, T. (2021). Analyzing ecological footprint through the lens of globalization, financial development, natural resources, human capital and urbanization. Pakistan Journal of Commerce and Social Sciences (PJCSS), 15(4), 765-795.
  • Ahmed, Z., Wang, Z., Mahmood, F., Hafeez, M., & Ali, N. (2019). Does globalization increase the ecological footprint? Empirical evidence from Malaysia. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 26(18), 18565-18582. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-019-05224-9
  • Alper, A. E., Alper, F. O., Ozayturk, G., & Mike, F. (2022). Testing the long-run impact of economic growth, energy consumption, and globalization on ecological footprint: New evidence from Fourier bootstrap ARDL and Fourier bootstrap Toda–Yamamoto test results. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 1-16.
  • Ansari, M. A., Ahmad, M. R., Siddique, S., & Mansoor, K. (2020). An environment Kuznets curve for ecological footprint: Evidence from GCC countries. Carbon Management, 11(4), 355-368.
  • Apaydın, Ş., Ursavaş, U., & Koç, Ü. (2021). The impact of globalization on the ecological footprint: Do convergence clubs matter? Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 28(38), 1-15.
  • Apaydin, Ş. (2020). Küreselleşmenin ekolojik ayakizi üzerindeki etkileri: Türkiye örneği. Ekonomi Politika ve Finans Araştırmaları Dergisi, 5(1), 23-42.
  • Awosusi, A. A., Adebayo, T. S., Kirikkaleli, D., & Altuntaş, M. (2022). Role of technological innovation and globalization in BRICS economies: Policy towards environmental sustainability. International Journal of Sustainable Development & World Ecology, 29(7), 593-610.
  • Bilgili, F., Ulucak, R., Koçak, E., & İlkay, S. Ç. (2020). Does globalization matter for environmental sustainability? Empirical investigation for Turkey by Markov regime switching models. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 27, 1087-1100.
  • Bucak, Ç. (2022). G8 ülkelerinde ve Türkiye’de ekonomik karmaşıklık ve ekolojik ayak izi ilişkisi: Toda-Yamamoto nedensellik testi analizi. Sosyal Ekonomik Araştırmalar Dergisi, 22(1), 1-16.
  • Çeliköz, Y. S., Yıldız, T., Arslan, Ü., & Kırmızıoğlu, H. (2022). The relationship between economic globalization and ecological footprint: Empirical evidence for developed and developing countries. Agricultural and Resource Economics: International Scientific E-Journal, 8(4), 109-133.
  • Figge, L., Oebels, K., & Offermans, A. (2017). The effects of globalization on Ecological Footprints: An empirical analysis. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 19, 863-876.
  • Gygli, S., Haelg, F., Potrafke, N., & Sturm, J.-E. (2019). The KOF globalisation index – revisited. The Review of International Organizations, 14(3), 543-574. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11558-019-09344-2
  • Ibrahiem, D. M., & Hanafy, S. A. (2020). Dynamic linkages amongst ecological footprints, fossil fuel energy consumption and globalization: An empirical analysis. Management of Environmental Quality: An International Journal, 31(6), 1549-1568.
  • IEA. (2023). CO2 Emissions in 2022. https://www.iea.org/news/global-co2-emissions-rose-less-than-initially-feared-in-2022-as-clean-energy-growth-offset-much-of-the-impact-of-greater-coal-and-oil-use
  • Karaduman, C. (2022). The effects of economic globalization and productivity on environmental quality: Evidence from newly industrialized countries. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 29(1), 639-652.
  • Kardaslar, A. (2022). Ekonomik Büyüme, Enerji Tüketimi ve Küreselleşme Sürecinin Ekolojik Ayak İzi Üzerindeki Etkisi: Türkiye Örneği. Business and Economics Research Journal, 13(3), 385-401.
  • Kırbaşoğlu, F., & Tüfekçi, Ö. (2019). Avrupa Birliği’nin Yükselen Güçler Politikası: BRICS ve MIKTA Ülkelerinin Meydan Okumaları. Novus Orbis: Siyaset Bilimi ve Uluslararası İlişkiler Dergisi, 2(1), 39-70.
  • Kihombo, S., Vaseer, A. I., Ahmed, Z., Chen, S., Kirikkaleli, D., & Adebayo, T. S. (2022). Is there a tradeoff between financial globalization, economic growth, and environmental sustainability? An advanced panel analysis. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 29, 3983-3993.
  • Kirikkaleli, D., Adebayo, T. S., Khan, Z., & Ali, S. (2021). Does globalization matter for ecological footprint in Turkey? Evidence from dual adjustment approach. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 28(11), 14009-14017.
  • KOF İsviçre Ekonomi Enstitüsü. (2023, Haziran 2). KOF Globalisation Index. https://kof.ethz.ch/en/forecasts-and-indicators/indicators/kof-globalisation-index.html
  • Langnel, Z., & Amegavi, G. B. (2020). Globalization, electricity consumption and ecological footprint: An autoregressive distributive lag (ARDL) approach. Sustainable Cities and Society, 63, 102482.
  • Nathaniel, S. P. (2021). Economic complexity versus ecological footprint in the era of globalization: Evidence from ASEAN countries. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 28, 64871-64881.
  • Official Website of MIKTA. (2023). Vision. http://mikta.org/about/vision/
  • Özbek, S. (2023). Ekonomik Büyüme, Küreselleşme ve Ekolojik Ayak İzi İlişkisi: ASEAN-5 Ülkeleri Üzerine Ekonometrik Bir Analiz. Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi Vizyoner Dergisi, 14(37), 123-138.
  • Pata, U. K. (2021). Renewable and non-renewable energy consumption, economic complexity, CO 2 emissions, and ecological footprint in the USA: testing the EKC hypothesis with a structural break. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 28, 846-861.
  • Pata, U. K., & Caglar, A. E. (2021). Investigating the EKC hypothesis with renewable energy consumption, human capital, globalization and trade openness for China: Evidence from augmented ARDL approach with a structural break. Energy, 216, 119220.
  • Pesaran, M. H. (2006). Estimation and inference in large heterogeneous panels with a multifactor error structure. Econometrica, 74(4), 967-1012.
  • Pesaran, M. H. (2007). A Simple Panel Unit Root Test in the Presence of Cross‐section Dependence. Journal of applied econometrics, 22(2), 265-312.
  • Pesaran, M. H., Ullah, A., & Yamagata, T. (2008). A bias‐adjusted LM test of error cross‐section independence. The Econometrics Journal, 11(1), 105-127. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1368-423X.2007.00227.x
  • Pesaran, M. H., & Yamagata, T. (2008). Testing slope homogeneity in large panels. Journal of econometrics, 142(1), 50-93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeconom.2007.05.010
  • Potrafke, N. (2015). The evidence on globalisation. The World Economy, 38(3), 509-552.
  • Rudolph, A., & Figge, L. (2017). Determinants of ecological footprints: What is the role of globalization? Ecological Indicators, 81, 348-361.
  • Sabir, S., & Gorus, M. S. (2019). The impact of globalization on ecological footprint: Empirical evidence from the South Asian countries. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 26, 33387-33398.
  • Sharif, A., Afshan, S., & Qureshi, M. A. (2019). Idolization and ramification between globalization and ecological footprints: Evidence from quantile-on-quantile approach. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 26, 11191-11211.
  • Swamy, P. A. (1970). Efficient inference in a random coefficient regression model. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, 311-323.
  • Villanthenkodath, M. A., & Pal, S. (2023). How economic globalization affects the ecological footprint in India? A novel dynamic ARDL simulations. Journal of Economic and Administrative Sciences.
  • Westerlund, J. (2007). Testing for error correction in panel data. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and statistics, 69(6), 709-748. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0084.2007.00477.x
  • WWF. (2012). Türkiye’nin ekolojk ayak izi raporu. https://www.wwf.org.tr/?1412/turkiyeninekolojikayakizibilancosu
  • Yilanci, V., & Gorus, M. S. (2020). Does economic globalization have predictive power for ecological footprint in MENA counties? A panel causality test with a Fourier function. Environmental science and pollution research, 27(32), 40552-40562.
  • Zheng, D., & Shi, M. (2017). Multiple environmental policies and pollution haven hypothesis: Evidence from China’s polluting industries. Journal of Cleaner Production, 141, 295-304. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.09.091
Toplam 40 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil Türkçe
Konular Finans ve Yatırım (Diğer)
Bölüm Makaleler
Yazarlar

Meltem Ince Yenilmez 0000-0002-4689-3196

Merve Erkut 0000-0002-1319-548X

Eylül Kabakçı Günay 0000-0001-5547-4316

Erken Görünüm Tarihi 26 Ocak 2024
Yayımlanma Tarihi 31 Ocak 2024
Gönderilme Tarihi 25 Temmuz 2023
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2024 Cilt: 25 Sayı: 1

Kaynak Göster

APA Ince Yenilmez, M., Erkut, M., & Kabakçı Günay, E. (2024). Küreselleşme ve Ekolojik Ayak İzi Arasındaki İlişki: MIKTA Ülkeleri Örneği. Cumhuriyet Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi, 25(1), 14-26. https://doi.org/10.37880/cumuiibf.1332363

Cited By

Enerji İkilemi: E7 Ülkelerinde Yenilenebilir Enerji Geçişi, Enerji Verimliliği ve Küreselleşmenin Çevre Kalitesi Üzerindeki Etkisi
İzmir İktisat Dergisi
https://doi.org/10.24988/ije.1479827
Küreselleşme ve Kentleşmenin Çevreye Etkisi: Türkiye Üzerine Bir Uygulama
Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi İşletme Fakültesi Dergisi
https://doi.org/10.24889/ifede.1501231
KARADENİZ EKONOMİK İŞ BİRLİĞİ ÖRGÜTÜ (KEİ) ÜYE ÜLKELERİNDE EKONOMİK BÜYÜME, KÜRESELLEŞME VE YENİLENEBİLİR ENERJİ KULLANIMININ EKOLOJİK AYAK İZİ ÜZERİNE ETKİLERİ
Karadeniz Araştırmaları
https://doi.org/10.56694/karadearas.1579495
 Kapak Resmi İndir

Cumhuriyet Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi Creative Commons Atıf-GayriTicari 4.0 Uluslararası Lisansı (CC BY NC) ile lisanslanmıştır.