Araştırma Makalesi

How Do Defaults Affect Behavior of Individual Retirement: Evidence from Ankara

Cilt: 22 Sayı: 2 8 Kasım 2021
PDF İndir
TR EN

How Do Defaults Affect Behavior of Individual Retirement: Evidence from Ankara

Abstract

Turkey is one of the few countries that has introduced national-level automatic enrollment in private pension systems to encourage people to save for retirement. Although the policy's effectiveness is debatable, it is fair to conclude that it has accelerated enrolment in individual pension plans. This is due to the fact that defaults have a significant impact on saving behavior. However, there are few empirical data that explain how defaults operate. To find out, we created a survey for Ankara public employees in order to explore possible demographic, financial, and behavioral constructs for automatic enrollment choices. Gender, marital status, and the number of dependents in the family all have an impact on the decisions. Other noteworthy findings concern behavioral constructs: Ankara public employees who find individual pension systems complex are more likely to opt out, and the public authority endorsement effect greatly reduces the risk of quitting the system. These findings show that there is a need for more educational and informational efforts on the pension system, and that policymakers have a significant amount of responsibility as a result of this strategy.

Keywords

Kaynakça

  1. Aksoy, E. E. (2019). "Individual Factors Affecting the Participation of Turkish People in the New Individual Pension System". In Behavioral Finance and Decision-Making Models, IGI Global (Ed.), 104-116.
  2. Alvi, M. (2016). A manual for selecting sampling techniques in research. Munich Personal RePEc Archive Paper No. 70218. https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/70218/1/MPRA, Last accessed: 2 February 2019
  3. Aydın, A. E. and Selçuk, E. A. (2017). Türkiye'de Bireysel Emeklilik Sistemine Katılım Kararını Etkileyen Faktörler. Finans Politik & Ekonomik Yorumlar, 54(632), 27-37. Benartzi, S. and Thaler, R. H. (2007). Heuristics and Biases in Retirement Savings Behavior. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 21(3), 81-104.
  4. Beshears, J., Choi, J. J., Laibson D and Madrian, B. C. (2008). "The Importance of Default Options for Retirement Saving Outcomes: Evidence from the United States". In Lessons from Pension Reform in the Americas, S.J. Kay ve T. Sinha (Ed.). Oxford University Press: US, 59-87.
  5. Beshears, J., Choi, J. J., Laibson, D. and Madrian, B. C. (2018). "Behavioral household finance". In Handbook of Behavioral Economics: Applications and Foundations I. Elsevier-North Holland: New York, 177-276.
  6. Blumenstock, J., Callen, M. and Ghani, T. (2018). Why do defaults affect behavior? Experimental evidence from Afghanistan. American Economic Review, 108(10), 2868-2901.
  7. Brown, J. R. and Previtero, A. (2014). Procrastination, present-biased preferences, and financial behaviors. Unpublished Working Paper, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign and University of Western Ontario.
  8. Brown, J. R., Farrell, A. M. and Weisbenner, S. J. (2012). The downside of defaults. NBER Retirement Research Center Paper No. NB 11-01.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil

İngilizce

Konular

Ekonomi

Bölüm

Araştırma Makalesi

Yayımlanma Tarihi

8 Kasım 2021

Gönderilme Tarihi

13 Ekim 2021

Kabul Tarihi

24 Ekim 2021

Yayımlandığı Sayı

Yıl 2021 Cilt: 22 Sayı: 2

Kaynak Göster

APA
Öztürk, F., & Serim, H. (2021). How Do Defaults Affect Behavior of Individual Retirement: Evidence from Ankara. Cumhuriyet Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi, 22(2), 480-503. https://doi.org/10.37880/cumuiibf.1009235

Cumhuriyet Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi Creative Commons Atıf-GayriTicari 4.0 Uluslararası Lisansı (CC BY NC) ile lisanslanmıştır.